When tech firms sue cities, it’s uncommon to see a decision — albeit a short lived one — in favor of the tech firm occur so rapidly, if in any respect. Lyft sued San Francisco in early June, claiming town was in violation of a 10-year contract that might give Lyft unique rights to function bike-share applications.
Now, town has granted Lyft an interim allow to deploy its dockless e-bikes, and is holding off on granting to permits to different operators. Lyft formally deployed its bikes on Friday.
“We’re thrilled to share our new ebikes with riders in San Francisco,” Lyft Head of Micromobility Coverage Caroline Samponaro mentioned in a press release. “We’ll be rolling out bikes beginning at present and admire our riders’ endurance as we waited for the inexperienced mild from SFMTA.”
In its lawsuit, Lyft sought a preliminary injunction or momentary restraining order to stop town from issuing permits to operators for stationless bike-share leases. Whereas the court docket denied Lyft’s request for a TRO, it did approve a preliminary injunction to briefly cease the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Company from issuing dockless permits to operators apart from Lyft, with out at the least giving Lyft the primary alternative to submit a proposal.
The entire course of, referred to as “Proper of First Supply,” might take months, in accordance with the SFMTA. That’s why it determined to supply Lyft an interim allow to function as much as 1,900 of its dockless, hybrid e-bikes along with its traditional bikes provided by way of its station-based service, as soon as generally known as Ford GoBike.
“These new bikes will enable Lyft to handle the extreme bicycle availability points that Bay Wheels has confronted since Lyft eliminated e-bikes from service in April,” the SFMTA wrote in a weblog submit. “Primarily, the interim allow permits the prevailing system to return to performance whilst we negotiate with Lyft for a possible future enlargement.”
The lawsuit was in mild of SF asserting it could take purposes for operators searching for permits to deploy further stationless bikes. San Francisco, nonetheless, mentioned the contract doesn’t apply to dockless bike-share, however solely station-based bike-share. Effectively, a choose sided with Lyft, saying the settlement did “not draw a distinction between docked/stationed and stationless/dockless bikes…Plaintiff subsequently is entitled to unconditional exclusivity for stationed or stationless ‘conventional’ bikes through the time period of the settlement.”
Whereas the method continues in court docket, the SFMTA has additionally prolonged JUMP’s allow for as much as 500 stationless bikes with a purpose to guarantee extra dependable companies.
I’ve reached out to Uber/JUMP and can replace this story if I hear again.