Beneficaries of NAB chairman controversy need to be determined: Awan

Investigations are underway within the current salacious video scandal involving chairman NAB, Firdous Ashiq Awan increasing upon the topic levied the burden of proof over media channel chargeable for bringing the controversy to the forefront, ARY Information reported.

Particular Assistant to the Prime Minister for Info and Broadcasting, Firdous Ashiq Awan in a media look on ARY’s present affairs speak present ‘Sawal Yeh hai’ opined that the Bureau is investigating the video and audio in query, “the onus of proving the allegations lie on the media channel which aired and hyped the problem.”

PML-N stalwart Malik Ahmad Khan in a presser immediately, Saturday introduced authorized motion towards chairman of the anti-graft watchdog for leveling “baseless” allegations towards Shehbaz Sharif in a TV interview.

Awan additional revealed that Pakistan Digital Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) had issued a discover to the non-public media channel chargeable for airing the divisive audio/video towards chairman NAB.

Awan questioned the intentions behind the controversy saying: “I wish to know what agenda drives this controversy, why a brand new Pandora’s field is being opened.”

Learn Extra: NAB Chairman controversy hatched by PML-N: Firdous Ashiq Awan

“If the channel chargeable for airing the infamous scandal fails to offer proof’s to again up their claims then the channel proprietor must endure authorized penalties, warned Awan.

Awan added: “it should be investigated that who’s the final word beneficiary of this controversy.”

Answering a query concerning PTI’s personal employees being below investigations for corruption the media advisor mentioned that Babar Awan is the one celebration chief who was served with a reference by NAB.

She additionally alleged that PML-N throughout their tenure needed to manage NAB in accordance with their whims.

Talking concerning the juxtaposition of the NAB chairman controversy to Prime Minister Imran Khan, Awan was of the opinion that somebody’s private life shouldn’t be a matter of concern for the PM and rubbished conspiracy theories attaching him to the ‘leak’.

Feedback

feedback

free web hosting site

Leave a Reply

Back to top button