The Canadian government ignored the 2006 pandemic preparedness report
June 3, 2020
May 15th W orld S. ophthalmologist W orld S. yes article titled “SARS Epidemic 2003: How the Canadian elite wasted the opportunity to prepare for the COVID-19 pandemic“Characterizing the response of the country’s ruling class to the novel coronavirus as” social crime. “
This point is further substantiated by the careful fourteen-year report commissioned by the federal and provincial governments after the 2003 SARS outbreak. The report anticipates the current COVID-19 pandemic and outlines a comprehensive public health response.
The recommendations contained in the report were basically ignored by all levels of government throughout the country.
Entitled “Canada’s Influenza Pandemic Plan for the Health Sector,” this 550-page report is a significant effort, developed through collaborative government at the federal, provincial or regional, and local levels.
He recalled the devastating impact of the pandemic and reaffirmed the need for preparedness, collaboration across provincial boundaries and government jurisdictions, and rapid response to early cases of influenza pandemic in the country.
Of special note is that the report was written jointly by Theresa Tam, the country’s current Chief Public Health Officer. Until January 29 this year, Tam underestimated the risk for Canadians from the new corona virus as “far, far lower than many countries.”
Tam made this statement a month after the federal government and doctors across the country were notified of a new virus outbreak in the Wuhan market that would be a source of pandemic. Four days earlier, on January 25, Canada had recorded its first COVID-19 case.
Even more surprising is how accurately this 2006 report predicts the development of outbreaks in Canada.
Under the section titled “Background,” the report makes predictions that this type of influenza pandemic is likely to originate in Asia, and that it might arrive in Canada within three months. The report goes on to estimate that the peak of infection will occur two to four months after the arrival of the virus, with the peak of death occurring one month afterwards.
Surprisingly, the report also predicted that more than 70 percent of the population would be infected with the virus. A “mild to moderate” epidemic will cause 15 to 35 percent of the population to become clinically ill (5.6 to 13 million people), with a staggering 10,000 to 60,000 deaths. The number of COVID-19 victims in Canada, currently at 7,395, continues to approach the lower limit of this projection.
Although the focus of the report is on influenza viruses, different from the novel 2019 coronavirus (designated SARS-CoV-2), this projection maintains its validity because of the same pathological features of both viruses, including the mode of transmission and symptoms of the disease. .
Therefore, the public health measures advocated by this report in the “Preparedness” section are no less interesting.
They stressed the need for rapid “collection, collection and analysis of epidemiological, laboratory and clinical data” about the new pandemic virus. This requires strong research preparation and testing capacity in the country’s medical laboratory. Instead, because of years of cuts in health care funding, Canada’s testing capacity remained very low even as the pandemic entered its sixth month.
In addition, a 2004 consultation by the World Health Organization cited in the report confirmed that the containment of the new pandemic virus would require “aggressive public health care measures,” including the use of “antiviral drugs, contact tracing, quarantine and outgoing screening.”
The report quietly acknowledges the plight of public health services in Canada. It described the country’s health care agency as “walking at maximum or near maximum bed capacity,” and warned that the pandemic could “exceed the capacity of current health care settings to deal with it.”
Images in 2020 of health care professionals who work with inadequate or non-existent personal protective equipment, and must request surgical mask donations from the general population, serve as a tragic confirmation that this warning is ignored by all levels of government and all political parties major in the 14 years after the report was published.
The three pillars of testing, contact tracing, and quarantine form the majority of the report’s plan to combat the pandemic prior to vaccine development. A group of data tables establish recommended public health measures to be applied at each stage of the evolution of a pandemic.
For example, even in scenarios where a foreign virus only hatches sporadic infections in Canada, the report recommends an approach only a few countries take to stop the spread of COVID-19, especially South Korea.
This determines “the collection and dissemination of epidemiological and clinical data for cases that occur in Canada,” followed by the need to “isolate cases,” and “quarantine or activity restrictions [sic] contact. “
Without providing political support to the South Korean capitalist government, it is clear that the early and aggressive detention of the COVID-19 outbreak through mass testing and contact tracing enabled it to emerge from the first wave of a pandemic with less than 300 dead.
Just as it was ignored for more than a decade by the federal, provincial, and municipal governments in Canada, the report has basically been ignored in corporate media pandemic coverage. To draw attention to this “pandemic guidebook” is to indict Canada’s big business government, past and present, for deliberately rejecting rational public health directives.
Governments throughout the country, from Trudeau and Liberals in Ottawa to the right Conservative Ford in Ontario and the Quebec Legault Avenir Coalition regime, instead rushed to fight to reopen all workplaces and public institutions. They did so by opposing warnings from medical experts that the return of early restriction could cause millions of infections and thousands of other deaths.
At the same time, a concerted effort is being made to blame the rise in infection in ordinary working class people. Stories about large crowds ignoring social distance guidelines have recently been given extensive coverage in the company’s press, ignoring the fact that figures like Ford exaggerate the mid-April decline in the new COVID-19 case to increase the government’s push to get back to work .
Nevertheless, the 2006 report remains an important document to illustrate how Canada, or any country, can effectively manage the current pandemic from a health perspective. This will be a valuable resource in future worker-led trials into dealing with the criminal ruling of Canada’s ruling elite over the current crisis.
This author also recommends:
Blog comments supported by Disqus ->
to request modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]