Amazon wins the suspension of the $ 10 billion ‘JEDI’ contract to Microsoft

SAN FRANCISCO: A federal judge temporarily blocked the US army on Thursday. UU. So that it does not grant a multi-million dollar cloud computing contract to Microsoft, after Amazon said the process was contaminated by the policy.

Judge Patricia Campbell-Smith issued a preliminary injunction requested by Amazon, which prohibits the Department of Defense from starting work on the contract known as JEDI, according to a summary of the ruling available online.

The details of the ruling were sealed for unspecified reasons.

Amazon has alleged that it was excluded from the agreement due to President Donald Trump’s revenge against the company and is seeking the testimony of the president and other senior officials on the reasons for granting the US $ 10 billion US military cloud computing contract.

The 10-year contract for the Joint Business Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) program will see all military branches sharing information in a cloud-based system driven by artificial intelligence.

An earlier Amazon court presentation detailed alleged errors that ended Microsoft’s election over its Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing division, part of the technology group led by Jeff Bezos, a frequent target of the president.

Microsoft trusts

Microsoft said it expected to prevail after the merits of the case are heard in court.

“We have confidence in the Department of Defense, and we believe that the facts will show that they executed a detailed, thorough and fair process to determine the needs of the warrior that Microsoft met best,” said Microsoft Vice President of Communications, Frank Shaw.

Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Amazon was considered the main contender to provide technology for JEDI, with AWS dominating the field of cloud computing and the company already provides classified servers for other government agencies, including the CIA.

The Pentagon’s mistakes in the contract were “difficult to understand and impossible to assess” when it separated from Trump’s “repeatedly expressed determination of, in the words of the president himself,” screwing Amazon “,” argued the court documents presented by Amazon .

Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, is a frequent target of the president of the United States, who claims that the newspaper is predisposed against him.

The protest filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims urges that rival JEDI offers be reassessed and a new decision is made.

As a condition of the court order, Amazon was instructed to provide $ 42 million that would be used to cover costs or damages incurred if it is determined that the court order was issued incorrectly.




image source

“Reminder not so subtle Amazon is still king”

There is no way to stop’s revenue growth, Wall Street analysts said Friday.

The e-commerce giant re-entered the $ 1 billion club after its results crushed expectations, benefiting from investments in faster shipments and an increase in Prime membership.

Almost half of the 51 brokerage houses that cover Amazon increased their price targets to 12 months in the company’s shares, which rose 9% to $ 2,036 in the first operations.

In a note titled “Reminder not so subtle, Amazon is still king,” reference analysts said Amazon reminded the world of its “size and capacity advantage,” and increased its target price by $ 150 to $ 2,400.

Net sales increased 21% to $ 87.4 billion, with sales from AWS, the business responsible for selling data storage and computing power in the cloud, growing 34%. Subscription fee revenues increased 32% as more buyers subscribed to Prime services.

“Amazon is less than half of the retail transformation by exploiting deep compliance pits established for many years,” said Canaccord Genuity analyst Michael Graham.

J.P. Morgan analyst Doug Anmuth raised his stock price target to $ 2,525 from $ 2,200, and said Amazon is still one of the best brokerage options on its US focus list. UU.

“Overall, in our opinion, Amazon’s ability to accelerate revenue growth on such a large scale is evidence that its investments (Prime One Day) are paying off,” Anmuth said.

“We are increasingly optimistic that Amazon will continue to run throughout 2020, both at the top and bottom lines.”

Amazon has been in and around the $ 1 billion club for a while now, accompanied by other tech giants like Apple, Alphabet and Microsoft.

Investors and analysts are promoting Visa Inc (V.N) and Mastercard Inc (MA.N) as the next online companies to move on to the elite list.

At a time when Amazon has been trying to improve its delivery times through internal initiatives, the company’s fortune could be intertwined with that of its delivery partner United Parcel Service Inc (UPS.N), which earns more than one tenth of its revenue through its partnership with the Washington-based company.

MKM Partners analyst Rohit Kulkarni said Amazon’s logistics business could outshine UPS in just five years.



image source

Modi’s occasion slams Bezos-owned Washington Submit

NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling occasion on Friday slammed editorial insurance policies of billionaire Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Submit, at the same time as his e-commerce agency Amazon introduced plans to create 1,000,000 jobs within the nation by 2025.

Vijay Chauthaiwale, the chief of the Bharatiya Janata Occasion’s (BJP) overseas affairs division, stated there was “a variety of downside” with the newspaper’s protection of India, with out giving any particular examples.

The swipe on the Submit got here a day after a cupboard minister gave brief shrift to Amazon’s (AMZN.O) funding plans for India.

Bezos has praised India throughout his ongoing go to, saying the 21st century would be the Indian century and that the dynamism and vitality within the nation was “one thing particular”.

“I’m not opposing Amazon as an organization, in truth I’m a daily buyer … Jeff Bezos ought to go house inform Washington Submit what’s his impression about India,” Chauthaiwale informed Reuters.

“The Washington Submit editorial coverage is very biased and agenda pushed.”

Washington Submit’s India bureau chief, Joanna Slater, referred a Reuters request for remark to the newspaper’s spokespersons in Washington, who didn’t instantly reply outdoors common enterprise hours.

Chauthaiwale has previously been essential of overseas media’s reporting on political points, together with on the disputed area of Kashmir which is claimed by each India and Pakistan, saying protection has been biased towards Modi.

Amazon didn’t reply to an electronic mail looking for touch upon Chauthaiwale’s remarks.

In Amazon’s assertion on Friday saying the job-creation plans, Bezos stated “we’re enthusiastic about what lies forward”, however road protests this week by small retailers and opposed feedback from politicians have made Bezos’ go to a public relations nightmare for Amazon.

India’s shopkeepers have represented a core constituency for the BJP for the reason that early days of the occasion. And sources informed Reuters that Modi, who has in any other case courted overseas buyers, was unlikely to fulfill Bezos throughout his go to regardless of repeated requests by the corporate in mild of merchants’ issues and an ongoing antitrust probe.



picture supply

Amazon boss Bezos to face protests from merchants throughout India journey

1000’s of small-scale merchants in India are planning to prepare protests in opposition to Inc (AMZN.O) founder Jeff Bezos, who will go to the nation subsequent week for an organization occasion and potential conferences with authorities officers.

Bezos will take part in an Amazon occasion in capital New Delhi aimed toward connecting with small and medium-sized enterprises, three sources instructed Reuters.

He has additionally sought conferences with the prime minister and different authorities officers, with conversations anticipated to focus on e-commerce, one of many sources conversant in the matter mentioned.

Particulars of Bezos’ go to, together with his arrival date and the length of his keep aren’t identified.

Amazon didn’t reply to a request to substantiate the go to. The prime minister’s workplace additionally didn’t reply to requests for remark.

The Confederation of All India Merchants (CAIT), a gaggle representing roughly 70 million brick-and-mortar retailers, mentioned it would protest throughout 300 cities throughout Bezos’ keep within the nation.

CAIT has since 2015 waged a battle in opposition to on-line retailers Amazon and Walmart (WMT.N)-controlled Flipkart, accusing them of deep reductions and flouting India’s international funding guidelines.

Each e-tailers have denied the allegations.

Amazon has beforehand mentioned its platform gives enterprise alternatives to hundreds of small sellers, artisans, weavers and ladies entrepreneurs. However CAIT shouldn’t be satisfied.

“We plan to prepare peaceable rallies in opposition to Jeff Bezos in all main cities resembling Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata in addition to smaller cities and cities,” Praveen Khandelwal, the group’s secretary common instructed Reuters.

Learn Extra: Indian guru ties up with Amazon, targets nation’s on-line market

“We count on to mobilize a minimum of 100,000 merchants within the protests.”

With its 1.three billion inhabitants and the world’s second-biggest smartphone consumer base that depends on low cost information for social media and on-line procuring, India is a key marketplace for U.S. retailers Amazon and Walmart to develop their enterprise.

Reductions on their platforms have helped lure Indians to buy on-line for every thing from groceries to massive digital gadgets, a phenomenon which merchants say has unfairly harm their enterprise.

New Delhi launched guidelines final yr to guard practically 130 million individuals depending on small-scale retail — a key voter base — by deterring massive on-line reductions.

The foundations compelled e-commerce companies to vary their enterprise buildings, drawing criticism from the USA and straining the 2 international locations’ commerce ties.

The federal commerce ministry is reviewing complaints and proof filed by CAIT in opposition to Flipkart and Amazon, Reuters reported beforehand.

picture supply

Ring cameras are susceptible to hackers: lawsuit and its Ring house safety digicam unit have been sued by an Alabama house owner who stated the cameras’ faulty design leaves purchasers susceptible to cyberattacks.

In a proposed class motion filed on Thursday, John Baker Orange stated an unknown hacker lately accessed his Ring digicam whereas his youngsters, ages 7, 9 and 10, had been taking part in basketball on the driveway, and thru its speaker system inspired them to maneuver nearer to the digicam.

Orange, who stated he paid $249 for his digicam in July, stated the cameras work solely when related to the web, and are “fatally flawed” as a result of they don’t defend in opposition to cyberattacks, regardless of Ring’s assurances of “peace of thoughts” and “good safety right here, there, in all places.”

A spokeswoman for Ring stated the Santa Monica, California-based firm doesn’t focus on authorized issues.

The grievance filed in Los Angeles federal court docket seeks unspecified damages from Ring and Seattle-based Amazon, in addition to improved safety for brand new and current Ring cameras.

It adopted a number of reported incidents of hackers accessing properties via Ring cameras, together with when a person repeatedly known as an 8-year-old Mississippi lady a racial slur and claimed he was Santa Claus.

“An organization that sells a tool that’s supposed to guard occupants of a house shouldn’t grow to be a platform for doubtlessly endangering these occupants,” John Yanchunis, a lawyer for Orange, stated in an interview.

Ring’s predominant product is a doorbell that incorporates a safety digicam and lets householders monitor and talk with guests via a telephone app even when they don’t seem to be at house.

Amazon has stated it purchased Ring in April 2018 for $839 million in money.

Orange, who lives in Jefferson County, Alabama, stated he modified his “medium-strong” password and commenced utilizing two-factor authentication for his digicam after studying concerning the incident involving his youngsters.

“So many gadgets are tethered to the Web, and customers merely don’t have a realization of how that may be so simply exploited,” Yanchunis stated.

The case is Orange v Ring LLC et al, U.S. District Court docket, Central District of California, No. 19-10899.



picture supply

Google, Fb, Amazon and Apple provide protection in congressional antitrust probe

WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO: 4 prime U.S. tech firms, Alphabet’s Google, Fb, and Apple, responded to questions from a congressional committee by defending their practices and declining to reply some questions.

The Home of Representatives Judiciary Committee, which launched the solutions Tuesday, had despatched the queries as a part of its antitrust probe of the 4 giants, which face an extended checklist of different antitrust probes.

The businesses, lengthy an emblem of the dynamism of the U.S. economic system, have seen their reputations tarnished by privateness lapses and allegations they abused their perch on prime of the market to harm small and nascent rivals.

Fb and Apple declined remark for this story whereas Amazon and Google had no rapid remark.

In its responses, Google, which owns YouTube, denied favoring its personal providers over these of rivals in search, video and web browsers.

It mentioned “the overwhelming majority” of clicks following a Google search go to non-Google web sites, that outcomes from its YouTube providing are usually not given better weight than rivals’, and that its phrase processing and analytics instruments are designed to work properly with all browsers, not simply its Chrome.

Google additionally mentioned its “vertical integration” of promoting instruments advantages advertisers partially by means of higher shopper focusing on, however that the flexibility of rivals to compete shouldn’t be “meaningfully affected” as a result of it takes steps to degree the enjoying discipline.

Regardless of its enormous assortment of information on search queries and clicks, Google mentioned it couldn’t present a lot of the information sought by the committee. For instance, requested whether or not it might share what number of searches show location details about a enterprise, Google mentioned, “We shouldn’t have a normal definition for what searches are thought-about ‘location searches’ and thus, can not present the particular data requested.”

For its half, Fb acknowledged slicing off sure third-party apps from its developer platform for replicating core functionalities, resembling Twitter’s now-shuttered Vine, which it mentioned replicated a Fb product.

Nevertheless it supplied restricted solutions to different questions on the corporate’s dealing with of potential rivals. For instance, requested for the timing and “precise circumstances” that led it to take away apps Phhhoto, MessageMe, Voxer and Stackla, Fb replied that it “will limit apps that violate its insurance policies,” with out disclosing particulars.

On a associated notice, Senators Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, and Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, wrote to Fb Tuesday to ask how the social media large acquires customers’ areas, why areas are collected and if assortment happens when customers have requested that it not be.

Apple answered questions on its browser and commissions it pays in its App Retailer, and addressed different points, most of that are usually recognized. It mentioned precisely two workers had sought to take disputes to arbitration. However requested how a lot it had spent on its map app that competes with Google, it mentioned solely “billions.” mentioned in its response that it makes use of aggregated information from retailers on its third-party market for “enterprise functions,” however denied utilizing the information to launch, supply or value private-label merchandise.

As of Sept. 29, there have been roughly 384,000 U.S. lively particular person vendor accounts on Amazon and roughly 514,000 lively skilled vendor accounts within the U.S, the corporate mentioned.

Amazon additionally acknowledged asking third-party retailers to decrease their value on, when it finds retailers promote objects for much less on a competing web site.

Amazon declined, nonetheless, to say what number of Amazon personal label merchandise are offered at value or beneath value, how a lot income and revenue Amazon makes from promoting personal manufacturers or the way it costs such objects.

Amazon mentioned it has 45 manufacturers encompassing 158,000 private-label merchandise, in addition to some personal model objects which might be a part of its Amazon Recent grocery supply service.



picture supply