LHC issues detailed verdict on the annulment of Musharraf’s death sentence

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) issued a detailed verdict Monday on the declaration of the formation of a special court to hear the case of high treason against former President Pervez Musharraf as illegal, reported ARY News.

The detailed verdict was issued by Judge Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi.

The court in its verdict said that Article VI could not be applied from the past. The bank also removed clause (ix) of the Special Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 1976.

Article 6 of the Constitution was modified through the 18th Amendment in 2010, while the case against Musharraf referred to events that occurred before that.

Read more: “They didn’t give me a fair trial in case of treason”: Pervez Musharraf

Musharraf had been sentenced to death by a special court on December 17, 2019, after six years of hearing the case, which was brought against him by the previous PML-N government after taking office in 2013.

Read the detailed verdict here:

null

null

Comments

comments



image source

Particular court docket points detailed judgement in Pervez Musharraf treason case

ISLAMABAD: The Particular Courtroom on Thursday issued detailed judgement in excessive treason case in opposition to former president Pervez Musharraf, ARY Information reported on Thursday.

The licensed copy of the decision contains 169 pages, was handed over to the counsel of Pervez Musharraf and officers of the inside ministry.

In line with the detailed verdict, Justice Waqar Seth and Justice Shahid Kareem awarded dying sentence to the previous president, whereas one other member of the bench Justice Nazir Akbar had wrote a dissenting be aware and introduced to set Pervez Musharraf freed from the fees.

“The prosecution workforce didn’t show costs in opposition to the previous president”, Justice Nazir Akbar’s dissenting be aware reads.

Musharraf was offered ample time to look earlier than the court docket and report his assertion from starting of the case in 2013 until 2019, however he didn’t appeared.

“The judgement was pronounced in absentia of the accused after declaring him absconder”, the judgement reads.

Justice Waqar in his remarks stated to move Musharraf’s physique to Islamabad’ D-Chowk, if he expires earlier than his punishment.

Learn extra: ‘I used to be not given truthful trial in treason case’: Pervez Musharraf

Earlier, the registrar of the particular court docket had stated, the decision wouldn’t be offered to the media, it might solely be offered to the counsel of former president.

On Tuesday, particular court docket awarded dying sentence to former president Pervez Musharraf in excessive treason case in opposition to him.

The particular court docket, headed by Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth determined the excessive treason case with 2-1 break up verdict in opposition to the previous President and Army Chief.

The previous army chief is at present in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Learn extra: Military expresses concern over particular court docket’s verdict in Musharraf treason case

Costs Towards Musharraf

The previous president is accused of treason below Article 6 for suspending, subverting and abrogating the Structure, imposing an emergency within the nation in November 2007 and detaining judges of the superior courts.

The indictment contains 5 costs cited imposition of Nov 3, 2007 emergency as one of many costs in opposition to Musharraf which led to the violation of Article 6 of the Structure.

The indictment additionally included the deposition of superior court docket judges and the suspension of elementary rights among the many checklist of costs.

Feedback

feedback



picture supply

IHC points detailed verdict in Zardari’s bail plea rejection

ISLAMABAD: Detailed verdict within the bail plea of former president Asif Ali Zardari, rejected by the Islamabad Excessive Courtroom (IHC), in faux financial institution accounts case has been issued on Tuesday, ARY Information reported.

A seven-page detailed verdict has been issued with the signatures of Justice Aamir Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiani.

The decision states that the Supreme Courtroom within the Avenfield case had set precedents for bail in circumstances of the NAB. Additional, the choice of the Supreme Courtroom can also be relevant to issues of bail earlier than arrest.

In line with the IHC verdict, the bail plea of Pakistan Folks’s Celebration (PPP) co-Chairman Asif Ali Zardari was rejected on benefit.

“The furnishing of a bond underneath part 90 Cr.P.C will not be a bar for NAB to arrest petitioners for investigation of the case because the bond is submitted just for a private look earlier than the courtroom”, the decision learn.

Learn extra: NAB arrests Asif Zardari in faux financial institution accounts case

Moreover, the decision stated, the Chairman NAB has no lawful authority to execute warrants of arrest.

On June 10, Nationwide Accountability Bureau (NAB) had arrested Asif Ali Zardari as Islamabad Excessive Courtroom (IHC) turned down bail pleas of the previous president and his sister Faryal Talpur in a mega-money laundering case.

Asif Zardari is presently in NAB custody on bodily remand.

Feedback

feedback



picture supply