Tag Archives: ally

There is no difference with a political ally: Governor | Instant News


LAHORE – Punjab governor Chaudhry Mohammad Sarwar on Monday said there was no difference between the government and its ally Pakistan Muslim League – Quaid-e-Azam (PML-Q) and would support the government for a period of five years.

Speaking with media people at Allama Iqbal’s mausoleum here, he said the PML-Q was a time-tested ally of the government and both sides were on the same page.

“The government has nothing to do with the arrest of the opposition leader,” he replied, adding that the government does not believe in political victimization.

Against another question, he said all other political parties including PML-N and PPP are facing cases in court today.

All of these people have made a case against each other. The PTI government has not filed a lawsuit against anyone, he added. “People have rejected the rhetoric of the opposition. There will be no elections before 2023.

If the opposition wants talks to end accountability, then there is no such question. All institutions, including NAB, work with complete independence, ”he replied.

Responding to questions, Sarwar said the opposition wanted an end to the PTI rule and the accountability process at home, adding that neither would happen.

He said the government was ready to sit down with opposition parties on issues of national interest, but there would be no compromise in fighting corruption.

Responding to another question, the governor of Punjab said that the decision on who should come to power can only be taken with the power of the people’s votes, so that the opposition parties have to wait for general elections rather than holding rallies.

The governor of Punjab said if any PML-N members were arrested by the police, it was the police’s responsibility to ensure law and order and were free to take action. He said the government would not interfere in police matters in any way, adding that, under Prime Minister Imran Khan’s leadership, the rule of law was the government’s first priority.

Sarwar said with the election of US President Joe Biden, peace will flourish in the world while the US President will bring the world together to solve problems like Kashmir and Palestine and they will do what is necessary to bring peace to the world.

Sarwar said, “Under the leadership of Prime Minister Imran Khan, we want to create a Pakistan where law is equal for all and the poor can be guaranteed the provision of health and other facilities including education.”

He said towering personalities like Allama Dr Muhammad Iqbal were born after centuries, adding that Allama Iqbal united Indian Muslims with his poetry and thought-provoking philosophy. He said, “We need to follow the thinking of Eastern poets to regain our lost glory in the world.”

The Visit of the Governor of Punjab

Iqbal’s Mausoleum

The governor on Monday visited the grave of the poet Timur, Allama Dr Muhammad Iqbal and laid wreaths on the grave to commemorate Allama Iqbal’s 143rd anniversary.

Chaudhry Sarwar presents destiny and prays for the solidarity, security, progress and prosperity of the country in addition to recording his impressions in the Visitor Book.

Paying homage to Allama Dr Muhammad Iqbal, the Governor wrote: “Allama Dr Muhammad Iqbal is the greatest benefactor to Muslims in the sub-continent who are rising within it.

a sense of identity and reminds them of their lost glory besides instilling in them the desire for freedom ”. “November 9 is the day of renewing our pledge that we will eradicate extremism from the country by following the teachings of the poet Alama Timur, Dr Muhammad Iqbal,” he added.

.



image source

Durbin Discusses Withdrawal of Troops from Germany, Covid-19 Testing with the Minister of Defense | Instant News




Durbin Discusses Withdrawal of Troops from Germany, Testing Covid-19 with the Minister of Defense | RiverBender.com



























.



image source

Europe has a lot of experience dealing with painful history Columnist | Instant News


Adolf Hitler Place? Statue of Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin? When the controversy about historical monuments raged throughout the United States, European negotiations with the past suggested a strategy for America’s future.

Having experienced autocracy, communism, democracy, fascism and monarchy over the past century, Europeans have repeatedly dealt with the controversy of public memory.

In one Czech city, the statue of Czechoslovakia’s first president has been removed and reinstalled five times.

When I asked an old East German woman in Merseburg for guidance in early 1991, she replied that she was no longer sure because the street names had changed more often than she remembered. Having lived since 1918 under an authoritarian monarchy, the Weimar Republic, the Third Reich, the democratic Communist dictatorship and Germany, East Germany knows very well the impermanence of historical markers because each new government brings with it new monuments, street names and warnings.

For political historians of the past, such “memory sites” shaped and reflected national identity and political dynamics. In short, there is no such thing as a definite history, let alone a universal understanding of the past.

Former classical professor Franklin & Marshall College Harriet Flower has described how the obsession of the Roman Empire to commemorate and erase the past, including through the statues of the emperor, was influenced by a shift from the republic to imperial rule and from one dynasty to another.

In Europe, with the rise of modern nationalism in the 19th century, the elite formed a national narrative that provided citizens with a newly industrialized monument with a monument that represented, in the words of the anthropologist Benedict Anderson, “the imagined community.”

The most careful calculations with the past – not only in Europe, but globally – have taken place in Germany, where the genocidal crime of the Nazi regime continues to have a strong influence on public and political discourse. In a process referred to as overcome the past or Dealing with the past, German efforts to “reach an agreement with the past” have proceeded appropriately and began – and never without internal strife: West German youth in the late 1960s challenged family members to maintain their behavior in the Third Reich, while the former East German struggled to reconcile the history of Nazi persecution of the Communists with new knowledge about German involvement in the Holocaust.

The former concentration camp in Germany is a historical museum, as is the Nazi death camp in Poland, the most famous being Auschwitz, where 90% of the victims were Jewish. The symbol of Hitler Reich was banned – the Berlin stadium built for the 1936 Olympics, for example, replaced the swastika with historic plaques. In all of Germany, more than 1,200 round stone known as brass Resistance (“Stumbling block”) marks the former homes of deported German Jews.

The German capital alone marks more than 300 memory sites – mostly for victims of National Socialism, but also for Communism and the Berlin Conference of 1884-85 where European powers (and the United States) drew up rules to divide Africa. Commemoration of the murdered European Jews is located in the heart of the city, next to the iconic Brandenburg Gate and the American Embassy.

As the opinion of the leading German contemporary philosopher, Jürgen Habermas, argues, Auschwitz occupies the center of German national identity; past burdens are ongoing and cannot be lost.

East Germany, of course, was not the only European to overthrow Communism, although the dismantling of the Berlin Wall represented the most dramatic destruction of symbols and barriers to the Cold War. Throughout Eastern and Central Europe, statues of Communist leaders, especially Lenin, fell in the 1989 revolution and the following decade.

The politics of the past extend across Europe from the Baltic to the Balkans to the Mediterranean, where controversy over the dictatorial grave site of Francisco Franco has rocked the Spaniards when the northern Italian tomb Benito Mussolini continued to attract tourists.

Over the past few weeks, inspired by American anger after the murder of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis police, Europeans have launched widespread demonstrations against domestic racism. The statue of Voltaire Paris, the ideological godfather of the French Revolution and profiteers of the slave trade, was damaged, while activists in Bristol, England, dumped the statue in honor of slave trader Edward Colston at the port. In Antwerp, Belgium, authorities removed the statue of King Leopold II from Belgium, the occupier now called the Democratic Republic of Congo, after protesters set it on fire.

Indeed, European critics see a direct parallel between the warnings of the American Confederacy and those who respect European imperialism. In the same way that defenders of the Confederacy paint sympathetic portraits of plantation owners, many Europeans believe that the colonization of Africans and Asians increased non-Christian stations in life. What the second narrative ignores is clear historical evidence that the system of slavery and imperialism rests on racial hierarchy, economic exploitation, family separation, and systemic violence. That the so-called European “civilization mission” supported by the pistol was patented when weak imperial forces were forced to release their colonies after World War II drained their military and economic strength.

When Americans debate the meaning of their monuments, Europeans continue to pursue their own politics in the past. To be sure, releasing the statue speaks strongly for people’s rejection of the ideas and values ​​associated with the figures. Some historians compare direct efforts to rid Germany of Nazi monuments with calls to erase the warning of the Confederacy. But as in the United States, judgment is rarely one-sided.

While some Europeans argue that half-burying, tilting or overturning monuments better represents people’s rejection of their message, there are still those who argue to add historic plaques or even create alternative sites for memorials and statues, as did Hungarians in Budapest with Memento Park and Lithuania with Gruto Parkas, both of which houses relocating Communist monuments.

On the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier stated, “This is a country that you can only love with a broken heart.” According to the philosopher Habermas, the inevitable part of the past makes us responsible today.

When Europeans weigh the burden of history, their previous confrontation with a painful legacy provides a number of models of reflective and deliberative action. Maybe in this case European politics in the past offered a potential American path forward.

Maria D. Mitchell is a professor of history at Franklin & Marshall College.

.



image source

PML-Q, the other allies on board, said Governor Sarwar | Instant News


LAHORE: Punjab Governor Chaudhry Muhammad Sarwar said the PTI government had taken all decisions in consultation with allied parties, including PML-Q.

He denied that the PTI government had instituted cases against opposition party leaders, saying that all cases were being processed by NAB and that the accountability agency was actually institutionalized by the opposition party with each other.

He spoke to reporters after inaugurating the Coronavirus Testing Laboratory at ABWA Hospital and submitting rations to PTI MNA Riaz Fatiana by the Sarwar Foundation here Saturday. He said, “We believe in transparent and cross-board accountability and ensure that all accountability institutions remain apolitical.” He said NAB and all other accountability institutions were independent in making decisions.

Deputy Chairperson of the Sarwar Begum Perveen Sarwar Foundation, MD ABWA Hospital Khurram Iftikhar, businessman Junaid Subhani, Deputy Chairperson of Pakistan’s Foreign Commission Muhammad Waseem Ramay and others attended the occasion.

The Punjab governor said the government decided to reduce locking restrictions and open markets to reduce the economic problems of traders, workers and day laborers. However, this does not mean that the threat of coronavirus has receded, he said.

“The government is introducing policies in the best interests of the people and standing with the poor masses in these difficult times,” he said, adding that Prime Minister Imran Khan’s aid package for the poor and unemployed had no historical match. He said the aid package was distributed among the masses without political discrimination.

He said around 750,000 families had been given rations through the Punjab Development Network (PDN) and more rations were given to poor families.

He said the PDN included respected organizations such as Akhuwat, Sheikh Ijaz Trust, Sarwar Foundation.

Deputy Chairman of the Sarwar Begum Perveen Sarwar Foundation said his foundation had so far distributed food rations to 35,000 families affected by the pandemic in Punjab, Azad Kashmir and other provinces. “These are difficult times and demand that all welfare and philanthropic organizations join hands, serve humanity and emerge as a united state in this crisis,” he said.

APP added: Provincial Minister of Housing and Urban Development Mian Mehmoodur Rasheed gave an arrangement letter to 300 contract employees from the Park and Horticulture Authority (PHA) at the ceremony here on Saturday. Addressing the ceremony at the PHA headquarters, he said providing maximum employment for people was a core policy of the ruling government.

He congratulated the regulated employees and said that honest and hard-working workers played an important role in the development of departments and countries.

He appreciated the management of the PHA for maintaining the government announced standard lock-related operating procedures (SOPs) at the ceremony.

He said that during the locking up, PHA gardeners carried out their duties with courage and responsibility to make the City green.

He directs the management of the department to ensure giving rights to their employees to get better results. PHA Chair Yasir Gillani, Deputy Chair Hafiz Zeeshan Rasheed, Additional Director Tariq Ali Basra, Admin Director Amir Ibrahim and others were also present.

.



image source

Why did Germany surrender twice in World War II | Instant News


On May 7, 1945, Germany surrendered unconditionally to the Allies in Reims, France, ending World War II and the Third Reich.

Or did it happen on May 9 in Berlin?

Both are correct. Because of conflicting ideologies, disputes between the Soviet Union and its allies, and the legacy of the First World War, Germany actually surrendered twice.

When the Allied victory seemed even more certain in 1944 and 1945, the United States, the US, France and Britain bounce around ideas on condition of German surrender. But it is still unclear how the military signing or political surrender would be arranged when Adolf Hitler died of suicide in the Berlin bunker on April 30, 1945, and his dictatorship reached a bloody end.

Hitler had appointed Karl Dönitz, a zealous sea admiral and Nazi, as his successor in his death. Dönitz was destined not to rule the new Germany, but rather to arrange for its dissolution. He quickly represented Alfred Jodl, chief of operations staff of the Armed Forces High Command, to negotiate the surrender of all German troops with General Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Alfred Jodl, chief of the German operations staff of the Armed Forces High Command, signed the “Act of Military Submission” without conditions and a ceasefire on May 7, 1945.

Photo by Universal History Archives, Universal / Getty Image Group

Dönitz hopes the negotiations will give him time to get as many people and German troops out of the advancing Russian path. He also hoped to convince the United States, Britain and France, who all did not trust the US, to turn against the Soviet Union so that Germany could continue its war on that front. Eisenhower looked through deception, and insisted Jodl sign the surrender instrument without negotiation. (Listen to stories from the latest voices of World War II.)

On May 7, Jodl signed “Military Submission Act” without conditions and ceasefire which will come into force at 11:01 the night. Central European Time on May 8. When Soviet Prime Minister Joseph Stalin heard that Germany had signed the unconditional surrender of all his troops in Reims, he was furious. He argued that because the US had sacrificed most troops and civilians during the war, his most important military commander had to accept German surrender rather than Soviet officers who witnessed the signing in Reims. Stalin opposed the location of the signing, too: Because Berlin had become the capital of the Third Reich, he argued, it should be the place of its surrender.

But Stalin’s third objection – that Jodl was not Germany’s most senior military official – would prove most convincing to the rest of the Allies, who all remembered how the signing of the ceasefire that ended World War I had helped plant the next seeds of World War.

In 1918, when the German Empire staggered to the brink of defeat, it collapsed and was replaced by a parliamentary republic. Matthias Erzberger, The new Foreign Minister, has signed the Compiègne ceasefire, in which Germany surrendered unconditionally.

The surrender was shocking to most German civilians, who had been told that their military was on the verge of victory. As a result, rumors began to circulate that the new German government, civilians – and other popular scapegoats, such as Marxists and Jews – had stabbed the military in the back. Erzberger was eventually killed as a result myth, which became a common repetition among new Nazi Party members when they joined forces to seize power. (Meet the forgotten ‘wolf cub’ from the Second World War.)

Stalin argued that allowing Jodl to surrender to Germany in World War II could open the door to a new back-stabbing myth because he had been represented by Dönitz, a head of civil state. Fearing that Germany could again insist that its surrender was invalid if someone other than Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, the supreme commander of all German forces, personally signed the document, the Allies decided to return the surrender.

On May 8, Keitel headed to Karlshorst, a Berlin suburb, to sign documents in front of Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov and a small Allied delegation. But Keitel believes one small point, hoping to add a clause giving his troops a grace period of at least 12 hours to ensure they receive a ceasefire order before facing any punishment for continuing to fight. Zhukov finally offered Keitel a verbal promise but did not grant his request to add a clause. Because of the delay, that document not executed until the truce should begin – and May 9 has arrived.

Russia celebrate May 9 as Victory Day to this day. Reims surrendered not even reported in the Soviet press until the day after, the proof complied some observers that the second surrender is a Movable propaganda was arranged so that Stalin could claim a greater share of credit to end the war. However, throughout the world, Day V-E (Victory in Europe) is celebrated on May 8, the day a ceasefire is officially scheduled to begin.

.



image source