Lahore:Lahore High court chief justice Muhammad Qasim Khan on Wednesday showed concern about the poor performance of the Federal law officer in a case pertaining to change the name of Benazir income support programme (BISP) and directed the law Minister, the law and the attorney-General to draw the attention of ill-preparedness by the Deputy Prosecutor General.
The court after hearing the petition of the President of the PPP Punjab Qamar Zaman Cairo, the first Chairman of the BISP, referring to the fact that this program was started under legal cover after the then Parliament passed a law, namely the “Benazir income support act of 2010 program”.He said that the present government illegally changed the name of the BISP program Ehsaas. Kaira presented in the petition that the name of the program cannot be changed without amending the law and this exercise has not been done by Parliament. He noted that the government had not presented any bill in the Parliament to amend the law.
He asked the court to postpone the government’s decision to change the name of BISP and to restrain him from committing any illegal changes to the law. In Wednesday’s hearing, chief justice Khan asked a Deputy attorney General Israr Malik, as if no rules were issued under the program Ehsas.
Officer, the law says that the policy for the new program. CJ found the answer unsatisfactory and the employee said that he appeared in court without any training. CJ asked the law officer, law Secretary and the attorney-General to consider this matter at the departmental level.
Doug Israr told the court that he was not familiar with the case as it appeared on the site Doug Asad Ali Bajwa, who previously represented the government. However, the CJ noted that the law officer had informed the court and asked him now to explain his position before the Department. The CJ adjourned the meeting for two weeks.
The study shows, emotional exhaustion and burnout among doctors is significantly improved when the pandemic began, and that there are differences between how men and women were injured. Female doctors reported slightly higher stress levels at work and at home.
“Women are more likely to have a stewardship role, whether with children or with a relative,” said Mary Crow, head of emergency medicine in California. “They are also more likely to provide more hours of care than their male counterparts. It’s very, very tense”.
Dr. Raven took part in the study in March and April, when much less was known about transmission of the virus.
Most doctors surveyed reported changes in behaviour in relation to family and friends, especially by attachment.
“There were a couple times when I had minor symptoms and was tested and was negative, but you have to be a lot more careful, especially as a doctor, where you could really bring it home. You can’t just mindlessly hug your child as normal as possible,” said Raven.
Both Rodriguez and Raven say increased supplies of PPE has reduced doctor stress levels. They both say that the anxiety can be even more reduced if rapid testing were more widespread and if everyone had to wear the mask more seriously.
“We all need to take responsibility and wear masks,” said Rodriguez.
Rodriguez said he will continue to study the stress levels through the pandemic, to address the various stressors that occur as the occurrence of various problems.
If you have a question or comment about the pandemic coronavirus, add your review using the form below or here.
Of coronavirus (COVID-19), caused by acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-cov-2) can be a stressful and traumatic experience. Patients who are seriously ill with a viral infection should be screened for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to their experiences in the struggle for life, experts in the field of mental health is recommended.
PTSD occurs in people who have experienced a traumatic event. Pandemic coronavirus can be a lot of stress, especially for those who were admitted and became critically ill due to an infection.
Psychologists and psychiatrists called for NHS to make sure that those who leave the hospital are screened and regularly evaluated. Those who show symptoms of PTSD should be treated to prevent recurring problems, such as nightmares.
In COVID trauma response working group, which included mental health experts from king’s College London, University College London, University of Oxford, the University of Haifa in Israel, and the NHS, said that those who were admitted in intensive care would be seriously ill enough to develop PTSD, and urged the government national screening program.
Image Credit: Chanintorn.I / shutterstock
What is PTSD?
PTSD develops in some people who have experienced shocking, scary or dangerous events, according to the National Institute of mental health.
Fear or fear is a natural occurrence after a traumatic experience. Fear causes many immediate changes in the body to protect itself from danger or to avoid it. In response to the terrible situation in the body aktiviziruyutsya “fight or flight” response to protect from harm.
In people with PTSD, they may feel stressed, scared or anxious, even when they are not in danger. Most people with this disorder may experience symptoms within three months of a traumatic or stressful event. Symptoms can last for more than a month and be severe enough to change the relationship, work and daily activities.
Symptoms include flashbacks, racing heart beat, terrible thoughts, terrible dreams, fear of places that resemble the experience, the sense of time, having bad seizures, and loss of interest in pleasurable activities, in particular. Getting early treatment is necessary to reduce the progression of the disease.
PTSD after COVID-19 infection
The team published clinical guidelines to inform NHS clinicians and planners on how to meet the needs of mental health COVID-19 survivors.
Health experts estimate that speech can go about tens of thousands of people at risk of PTSD because of the severity of their COVID-19 symptoms. More than 100,000 people were hospitalized due to an infection, and frightening experiences can have a negative impact on their mental health.
“Given the very scary and invasive nature Covid-19 intensive care experience, the risk of death and the potential for long-term medical complications, most affected by Covid-19 are likely to be exposed to a high risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder and other stress-related mental health difficulties,” Dr. Michael Bloomfield of University College London, said.
He added that some of the functions and clinical manifestations unique to COVID-19 can adversely affect mental and psychological health of patients. Some factors can also exacerbate psychological consequences, such as isolation from loved ones during and after hospitalization.
When patients do not seek medical help at the right time, this can lead to chronic diseases and permanent mental health problems.
The team also believes that patients who have experienced serious symptoms coronavirus, or those who were seriously ill, are at high risk for problems with mental health. Overall, 40% of people discharged from the symptoms of the SIS report anxiety and 30% report symptoms of depression, and 20 percent report symptoms of PTSD.
“There may be a direct effect on mental health and the one that emerges over time. For example, the level of diagnosed mental health problems are present in 60% ill SARS-cov up to one year later. At 30 months, it was reduced by a third, including 25% with PTSD and 16% with depression. Survivors other outbreaks of coronavirus is also misleading, because of the fear of condemnation, contaminating others, again Contracting the diseases, and chronic fatigue syndrome”, wrote the experts in the manual.
The panel recommends that the NHS should actively monitor and ensure immediate treatment for patients who have experienced COVID-19 For mental health problems, including depression, anxiety disorder and PTSD. Must be national “screen and treat” service to access more patients, including in communities. In addition, patients who fell into critical condition due to the new coronavirus should have a regular consultation at least a year.
CEO of Volunteer Canada, said the national organization rejected the offer of work for us charity in delivering a new canadian student in political problems with the program, including the fact that volunteers do not need to be an hourly rate.
Plans for a new $912 million student volunteer program was first announced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in April, but details of the program – that his administration will be entirely given to us, the charity was not announced until last Thursday.
In an interview with “globe” and “Sunday Mail”, the CEO of volunteer Canada Paula Speevak said that we are a charity organization approached her to work for us in promoting the program and puts us in contact with organizations looking for volunteers.
Story continues below advertisement
“There would be a fee for this,” she said, explaining that we offered to pay voluntarily to Canada to work on the grants program, including encouragement, advice on how to attract other organizations and helping to create educational content. “We refused”.
Ms. Speevak said her organization, which is a national body that provides experts on volunteering and volunteers from one group To the need immediately expressed concern to the government in April that the program should not blur the boundaries between paid work and volunteering with a system of remuneration based on hours worked, as well as other issues.
But when Mr. Trudeau announced last week the details, they showed student volunteers aged 15 to 30 years can apply for a grant of $ 1,000 per 100 hours of volunteering completed up to $5,000 for 500 hours. That would be the equivalent of $10 per hour, which is below the minimum wage in all provinces.
While the program describes the payments as grants, Ms. Speevak said that the structure of payments similar to paying an hourly wage.
“When people volunteer, they do not pay hourly rate,” said Mrs. Speevak. “Therefore, in terms of promoting the idea of volunteerism, which could give the wrong idea about volunteering. And if that’s what they pay below the minimum wage, then that’s a concern as well. It works or is it volunteering? And when it’s not, then it becomes a problem,” she said. “That was the concern that people have come up with [in the voluntary sector] say they don’t want anything exploitative”.
Ms. Speevak said her comments focused on concern with the program rules and not critics, we charity. She said that we were given the opportunity to volunteer in Canada, more than 200 local volunteer centers, each of which is associated volunteer group is free to make their own decisions about whether to work or not to work with us.
“Of course, I do not condemn those organizations that decided to participate and cooperate with this organization. Each of us has our own philosophy,” she said.
Story continues below advertisement
We are a charitable organisation declined to comment Sunday and referred all questions to the Department of employment and social development Canada.
“We hope that you understand that any comments regarding [Canada Student Service Grant] will have to come from the government,” the public relations Department we Bo said in an email.
Opposition MPs criticized the government’s decision to award a contract, we take into account that the organization has close ties to Mr. Trudeau and his wife Sophie grégoire-Trudeau, who is a volunteer,“ said the Ambassador and ally” we’re good to take the initiative and conducts mental health podcast for the organization.
On Sunday, conservative MPs Pierre Poilievre, Dan Albas and Raquel Dancho released a letter addressed to the Auditor General Karen Hogan, asking her to turn in the provision of services through routine checks of Federal COVID-19 expenses.
“Outsourcing this program to third parties, the appropriate channels for criticism of the opposition, the very Foundation of our parliamentary democracy has been bypassed,” wrote they.
In Trudeaus regularly appear as keynote speakers on the day of the event, and we organise a charitable organization that attracts thousands of young people. We are a charity-this is the current name for an organization that started out as free the children, founded by Canadians Craig and Marc Kielburger when they were kids, against child slavery worldwide. Now we have the charity has a broader focus, which includes working with schools in Canada and other countries on our schools educational program that “fosters compassion in students and gives them the tools to create transformational social change.”
Story continues below advertisement
Section on the website we are a charity Fund, “together with his older brother, mark, Craig and his team went to a bold mission: to free children and their families from poverty and exploitation.”
The globe and mail is a media partner we are a charity.
Opposition MPs urged the government to release the total amount of charity we will receive in administrative costs and issue in the contract. Mr. Trudeau said Friday that we have not arrived at a contract. He also said that the Public service recommended us as the only group that can do the job.
A press-the Secretary of the Department of employment, Carbone Samuelle, said that the value of the contract and other details should be posted online in the fall. The Ministry also said that it is recommended that we do, because charity is well-suited to deliver the program due to their “track record” of work with young Canadians.
Daniel Keenan, the press Secretary of the youth employment Minister Bardish Chagger said the total amount that will be paid by us to a charity is not directly available, because it is based in part on the number of participants in the student volunteer.
She said that currently the government has allocated $19.5 million for the administration of the 20,000 placement of volunteers. Of this amount, $5 million for nonprofit partners. She also said that the government has already received about 20,000 applications.
Story continues below advertisement
In response to the volunteer Canada’s concerns about payment of volunteers is similar hourly wage, Ms. Keenan said that the programme explicitly aims to support volunteers.
“It’s very much about the capabilities of the service”, she said.
To know what is happening in the corridors of power with the highest political headlines and commentary, selected by the editors of the globe (only subscribers). Sign up today.
With most of the US forced to stay at home instead of working or schooling since March, it is unknown mental health the impact of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) possible in school-age children.
A team, led by Dr. Maria Loades, a clinical psychologist from the Department of Psychology at the University of Bath, established how loneliness and disease prevention measures can affect the mental health of children and adolescents.
Over the past few months the majority of children and adolescents in the US experience prolonged physical isolation from their friends, as well as teachers, extended families, and community networks.
While quarantining adults generally causes negative psychological effects, including confusion, anger, and post-traumatic stress, it is not known how these actions affect children.
In a quick review, researchers examined articles published between 1946-2020, with 20% of articles filtered using predetermined criteria and 20% of data duplicated for quality assurance.
Studies generally include children and adolescents, with participants experiencing social isolation or loneliness and valid assessments of depression, anxiety, trauma, obsessive compulsive disorder, mental health, or mental well-being.
The team found a total of 83 articles that met their inclusion criteria, with 63 studies reporting the impact of social isolation and loneliness on the mental health of previously healthy children and adolescents (n = 51,576; mean age, 15.3). Of the included studies, 61 were observational, 18 were longitudinal, and 43 were cross-sectional studies assessing self-reported loneliness in healthy children and adolescents.
In addition, 1 study was a retrospective investigation after a pandemic and 2 studies evaluated interventions. Each study has a high risk of bias, but longitudinal studies have better methodological quality. The studies are mostly from the US, China, Europe and Australia, but also include studies conducted in India, Malaysia, Korea. Thailand, Israel, Iran and Russia.
Overall, the researchers found that social isolation and loneliness increased the risk of depression, and the likelihood of anxiety during loneliness, measured between 0.25-9 years later. The duration of loneliness is highly correlated with mental health symptoms rather than the intensity of loneliness.
The researchers found young people were 3 times more likely to develop depression in the future because of social isolation, with the impact of loneliness on mental health that lasted up to 9 years later.
“Children and adolescents may be more likely to experience high levels of depression and possibly anxiety during and after forced isolation ends,” the authors write. “This can increase because forced isolation continues. Clinical services must offer preventative support and early intervention if possible and prepare for an increase in mental health problems. “
Researchers say this study should lead policymakers to expect increased demand for mental health services from younger people in the next few years,