Tag Archives: army

BREAKING New Army Remote Unit Towards Germany «Breaking Defense | Instant News


Lockheed’s Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) prototype was fired from an Army’s HIMARS launch truck

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon reversed Trump’s planned withdrawal from Germany and instead increased the Army’s ability to pay. high tech long distance warfare, soldiers announced this morning. The long-awaited announcement comes as 40,000 Russian troops gather along the border with Ukraine.

The Trump administration has planned it pulled 12,000 troops out of Germany to punish Berlin for not meeting NATO’s goal of spending 2 percent of its GDP on defense. In February, The Biden administration immediately put the plan on hold. Now come announcements today of the US Army Europe & Africa (Headquarters for the two continents just merged): The Army will not only maintain three locations in Germany that have been scheduled to withdraw, but will also add “about 500 Soldiers, 35 local national positions, and 750 Family members to US Army Garrison Wiesbaden.”

The 500 soldiers will organize two new units. Both are new types of formations that the Army uses to experiment with new tactics, technologies and organization for high-tech long-range operations. missile, artificial intelligence, and cyber/electronic warfare.

That Multi-Domain Task ForceEurope, founded September 16, will become the Army’s second MDTF. The first was made at Fort Lewis three years ago, Built around existing rocket artillery brigades but augmented extensively with high-tech assets. It has participated many practice in the Pacific and won awards from Army leaders for his “game-changing” abilities.

Army graphics

The notional organization for a future Multi-Domain Task Force, with weapons ranging from hypersonic missiles to electronic warfare.

The Army has long promised to build a second MDTF in Europe and recently the word will eventually create five: two in the Pacific, one in Europe, one in the Arctic, and a fifth for a “global response.”

“The Multi-Domain-European Task Force will consist of field artillery; composite air and missile defense; intelligence, cyberspace, electronic warfare, and outer space; aviation and brigade support elements, ” let go of the word. It is likely that most of these forces are already in Europe, but the new personnel will most likely fill the MDTF headquarters and be highly specialized, highly technical. Intelligence, Information, Cyber ​​/ Electronic Warfare & Space (I2CEWS) battalion.

While the MDTF was a combat unit, the other formation was a new type of base: the 1st Army Theater Fire Command, established on 16 October. Why is this necessary? To coordinate long-range missile strikes over a range far beyond traditional HQ command and control capabilities.

Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.  from Google Maps imagery & data

Approximate range in miles between the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad and certain NATO capitals. SOURCE: Google Maps

Russia and China have fielded precision-guided missile arsenals with ranges of hundreds or even thousands of miles. Now the Army is racing to do the same, develop 300-plus-miles PrSM, that 1,000 miles MRC, and hypersonic LRHW, whose range is classified but may be intercontinental. (PrSM will fire from existing HIMARS launchers, MRC and LRHW from specialized and larger ones). All of these weapons will enter service, in prototype form, in 2023 and become part of the Multi-Domain Task Force arsenal, while Theater Fires Command will organize wide-ranging attacks.

While some in the Air Force and friendly thinktanks argue that the Army’s long-range strike effort need not better duplicate what the bomber did, senior joint officers have supported the Army’s efforts as a useful option. That Pentagon officials let the Army create a new Theater Fire Command is an implicit motion in service plans for long-range warfare.

.



image source

The core business that the military is reminded of is using ‘deadly violence’ to defend Australian values ​​and sovereignty | Instant News


Assistant Secretary of Defense Andrew Hastie told military personnel that their “core business” would always be “the application of deadly violence” and warned “clarity of mission” was critical to their work.

The blunt direction from the former Special Forces officer came as Morrison government figures also targeted the Australian Defense Force (ADF) after scantily clad dancers helped formally commission the Navy’s newest ship, an act one senior figure has dubbed a “shitshow “.

Mr Hastie, who was last year promoted to a frontbench role, outlined his vision for a defense force in a message to Western Australian constituencies.

“Our military plays an important role throughout Australian society, whether during a pandemic, flood or fire,” wrote Hastie in her latest voter newsletter.

“But the ADF’s core business will always be deadly violence in defense of our values, sovereignty and interests. We must not forget that.”

The Liberal MP, who entered the Federal Parliament in 2015, previously served in the Special Air Service Regiment for five years, including being assigned to the war in Afghanistan.

In his email newsletter, Mr Hastie stated that “clarity of mission is essential in the weapons profession”.

“Without it, confusion grows – confusion about role, identity and purpose. And deadly confusion on the battlefield, at sea or in air combat,” he said.

“Mission focus is the foundation of victory. It gets everyone driving toward a single goal.”

‘We’ve been awake a little’

Senior figures from the Morrison administration said the Assistant Secretary’s message aligned with directives that new Defense Secretary Peter Dutton issued to top ADF officials during their initial meeting.

Within government, there is frustration over recent military decisions that have been seen as too “politically correct”, such as a A 2018 directive prohibiting soldiers from wearing the “death” symbol.

Concern is also growing over the Department of Defense’s ability to meet ambitious demands as set out in the Naval Shipbuilding Program’s multibillion dollar dollar bill.

Liberal supporter Phillip Thompson, who is also a former soldier, said ministers Dutton and Hastie made sure the ADF was focused on its core tasks.

The Queensland backbencher argues that the ADF has slid “too far to the left” with its social agenda in recent years.

“Our ADF must not be left or right, they have to be really in the middle of their job, and their job is to defend our country, our interests, our values, our sovereignty, but also when we run operations, have aggression. and unrepentant violence to complete the mission. “

‘How does Horatio Nelson think of this nonsense?’

One recent incident that caused disruption within the ranks of the federal government was the Navy’s decision last weekend to invite a group of scantily clad dancers for a routine that included twerking.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to search, up and down arrows for volume.
The dancers perform on the orders of the new Navy ship.

“The dancers are not important – we are meant to be a fighting force,” one government official told the ABC, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“A question worth pondering: how does Horatio Nelson think about this nonsense?”

The minister stated, “many members of parliament expressed their surprise at this ceremony to the government”.

“We have the CDF, we have members of Parliament there, and the Governor-General is there, I don’t think it’s appropriate to tamper with it.”

In 2019, when he was an LNP candidate, Mr Thompson apologized for the 2012 scolding on social media that threatened to harm Muslims.

.



image source

The business of the sanctioned Myanmar army spans the spectrum | Instant News


BANGKOK (AP) – Two large military-controlled conglomerates of Myanmar that were subjected to US and British sanctions following a military coup last month span a wide spectrum of businesses.

Human rights defenders laud the decision to target the companies and cut their ties with banks and businesses in the United States and Britain. Critics of the military’s February 1 coup, his imprisonment of Aung San Suu Kyi and other civilian leaders, and his murder and imprisonment of thousands of mostly peaceful protesters said more needed to be done to suppress military leaders.

They are still pressing the government to take action against another powerful kingdom, the Myanmar Oil & Gas Company, which does business with big foreign oil companies.

WHAT ARE THE COMPANIES COVERED BY THESE SANCTIONS?

A human rights fact-finding mission found that Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd. (sometimes spelled Myanma) and Myanmar Economic Corp. owns or controls more than 100 subsidiaries in many industries. Another 27 businesses are affiliated with one of the two conglomerates. This includes everything from rubber plantations and dairy farming to gem miners, telecommunications, construction, manufacturing, insurance and real estate companies. The income from many of these businesses helps support the military. Foreign companies that rent offices in buildings controlled or owned by MEC and MEHL or operate factories in industrial zones they control must find ways to ensure that they do not provide funds to the army.

WHAT IS SANCTION?

Great Britain announced it would sanction MEHL. US Treasury Department sanctions prohibit business and other transactions or trade with the persons and companies on its list unless they have special exemptions or authorizations. They can prohibit banks from even using the US dollar – the world’s leading currency – in transactions with two military holding companies. The sanctions exclude deals needed to conduct US government business or to provide humanitarian assistance and promote democracy. The assets of US-owned people and companies that are on the “Specially Designated Nationals” list are also frozen or blocked. The US, Canadian and British governments have previously put in a list of sanctions against military leaders and their immediate family members as well as several other military officers and units believed to be responsible for the crackdown on people demonstrating against the coup.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT?

It is unclear how much impact the sanctions will have on military cash flows as Asian neighbors Myanmar – its biggest investor and trading partner – have avoided imposing their own restrictions on doing business with the junta. However, human rights groups continue to laud the new sanctions. They will have a wider reach than previous actions taken against Myanmar’s coup leaders, who do little direct business with US banks or other US businesses. US and UK companies doing business with companies will need more extensive due diligence to avoid breaching sanctions.

WHAT MORE CAN BE DONE?

Human rights activists urge the European Union and governments in Asia to join in efforts to pressure the military to respect the 2020 election results and release Aung San Suu Kyi and other civilian leaders. The United Nations direct sanctions are unlikely to get the support of members of the Security Council of China and Russia. Myanmar’s Southeast Asian neighbors Japan and South Korea are less likely to support the use of sanctions. Another idea put forward was for companies doing business with the state-owned Myanmar Oil & Gas Company withholding royalty payments until the political crisis is resolved. Its foreign partners include France’s Total SA, Chevron Corp. and PTT Public Co. Ltd. from Thailand.

WHY SANCTIONS?

So far, the measures taken to suppress military leadership are not blanket trade sanctions that will cause widespread suffering for most people in Myanmar. Experts and activists have pressed for the measure to target the military and its leaders who carried out the coup and have suppressed the public reaction against it. Meanwhile, many in Myanmar have gone on strike, blocking banking, rail and other business operations to try to exert economic pressure from within the country.

.



image source

Pakistan military chief says it is time to ‘bury the past’ with India | National | Instant News


KARACHI, Pakistan – Pakistan’s powerful military commander General Qamar Javed Bajwa called on India “to bury the past and move forward,” in rare comments that came a day after Prime Minister Imran Khan urged New Delhi to move towards peace by solving problems around the Kashmir region. .

The nuclear-armed states have fought three wars since their independence from Britain in 1947, two of which took place in the Himalayan region. The area is divided between the two and claimed in its entirety by both of them. Their relationship has faced its worst bottleneck in years after a suicide attack in Indian Kashmir in February 2019 killed 40 soldiers. India retaliated with air strikes on suspected terror camps in Pakistan which it said were operating with the tacit blessing of Islamabad. Pakistan has always denied supporting terrorist groups.

The two countries withdrew their envoys later that year after India revoked the constitutional autonomy of its Jammu-Kashmir state.

“We are ready to improve our environment by solving all our extraordinary problems with our neighbors through dialogue,” said the military commander. “But for the resumption of a peace process or meaningful dialogue, our neighbors must create a conducive environment,” particularly in the Indian part of Kashmir.

Bajwa’s comments on the Islamabad Security Dialogue are important because the army, which has directly ruled Pakistan for about half of its history, has had a large role in Khan’s administration with input on foreign policy and security issues.

The peace offer follows an unusual joint statement by military commanders from India and Pakistan last month renewing vows to abide by a 2003 ceasefire in Kashmir.

“We have learned from the past to develop and want to move forward towards a new future,” said Bajwa. “However, all of this depends on reciprocity.”

Distributed by the Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Copyright 2021 Tribune Content Agency.

.



image source

The complexity of dealing with Myanmar | Instant News


People across Myanmar were celebrating the victory of Aung San Suu Kyi and his National League for Democracy on February 1, when the Myanmar Army, led by Supreme Commander General Min Aung Hlaing, attacked, with the announcement of a military takeover. This ended the country’s too short, five-year experiment with democratic governance.

Myanmar has been ruled by a military-led government from 1962 to 2016. The army declared a state of emergency one year immediately after taking over. All rallies and gatherings of more than five people are prohibited. Martial law was imposed in major urban centers across the country. The army plays a dominant role in Myanmar’s national life. The army led by General Bajwa, too, has the final say in determining national policy, in Imran Khan’s “democratic” Pakistan. Myanmar has been torn apart by ethnic rebellions since independence in 1948.

There are 130 recognized ethnic groups in Myanmar, with dozens of them taking up arms to challenge Central Authority. A group of 10 such ethnic organizations have announced that they will help protesters across the country. The army is dominated by a majority Burmese, who make up 68 percent of the country’s population. While Aung San Suu tried his best to unite people from different ethnic groups, he was unsuccessful in his endeavors, especially as some of the major ethnic groups were supported by China. A group like the United Wa State Army (UWSA), which operates across the China-Myanmar and Thailand-Myanmar borders, has an estimated strength of 25,000-30,000 troops. This has been complemented by China since the 1940s. China recently provided UWSA helicopters, along with anti-aircraft and anti-tank weaponry.

India has been battling armed separatist insurgencies in the northeastern states of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Tripura and Manipur for decades now. While our emphasis is on achieving a political solution in such situations, we have extensively used the army and paramilitary forces to meet the separatist challenge in the Northeast. This strategy has worked, because most groups, such as ULFA in Assam, NSCN (IM) and NSCN (K) in Nagaland and MNF in Mizoram, have joined the mainstream of national democracy.

The people of the Northeast are now enjoying the benefits of democratic governance. However, a small group of armed resistance still lags behind on the Myanmar-India border. India and Myanmar have cooperated extensively and effectively over the past three decades in closing infiltration and logistics routes for the supply of weapons to these separatist groups, which enter China’s Yunnan Province from Myanmar.

They accept weapons, communication equipment, and even finance in China. The Myanmar government has been working vigorously with India in dealing with this separatist threat. India, in turn, has been assisting Myanmar by cooperating with its security forces when armed separatist groups, such as the Arakan Army, cross into Indian territory. This is especially important now, as India is close to completing a strategic road, which will link the landlocked northeastern state with the Port of Sittwe on the Bay of Bengal, in Myanmar.

Road link

This road will be an important route for products from the Northeast to be transported throughout the country, and for international trade. While there is international outrage over the brutal military action by the Myanmar army against its own people, the country looks set to engage in a long-term popular resistance to violent oppression. Resistance to the Myanmar army actually unites 130 ethnic communities that firmly oppose military rule.

While the UN Security Council has passed resolutions calling for Aung San Suu Kyi’s release, history has shown that supported by China and Russia, Myanmar’s military is confident that any resolution against her in the UN Security Council will be vetoed. India is also of the view that, as in the past, democratic change in Myanmar can only occur through reconciliation, and not oppression. The people of Myanmar have always found that even their Asean neighbors were unable to forge the unity needed to voice support for the Myanmar people. In fact, most Asean members are reluctant to interfere in each other’s internal affairs.

Moreover, the threat of global economic sanctions by the West will have little impact, as this move will be vetoed by China and Russia in the Security Council. Therefore, the most that the UN Security Council can and will do is to call for the early restoration of democracy and the immediate release of Aung San Suu Kyi. General Min Aung Hlaing likely wouldn’t heed such a resolution. And, Myanmar knows that not only Russia and China but many of its ASEAN neighbors do not like any interference in its internal affairs. In these circumstances, very little can be achieved by joining calls for sanctions by the West led by the US and the EU. The current situation in Myanmar only provides a more strategic space for China to take on the dominating role and influence in Myanmar, while also meddling in the internal affairs of our northeastern state. China will build a port at Kyaukphyu, near the Indian port of Sittwe. The Kyaukphyu will be connected by road to China’s landlocked Yunnan province. Armed separatist groups in the Northeast cross our border into Myanmar and then enter China’s Yunnan Province. They were well received in Yunnan and equipped with weapons, for use in India when they returned.

There is close cooperation between the Myanmar and Indian soldiers to deal with armed rebels crossing the border. Like devout Buddhists elsewhere, the majority Buddhist population in Myanmar will receive facilities to visit Bodh Gaya and other Buddhist sites in India. However, very few Buddhist pilgrims travel from Myanmar to Bodh Gaya.

Relations with Myanmar would benefit greatly if India could imaginatively build a rail and road corridor through Manipur to Bodh Gaya, for Buddhist pilgrims. In addition, there are an estimated 460 million Buddhists living throughout our eastern neighborhood, who wish to visit Buddhist temples in India as their relatives in Myanmar. India has not been able to be as good as China, Japan and Myanmar, neighboring ASEAN countries in promoting tourism, business and economic cooperation with Yangon.

The author is a former

High Commissioner for Pakistan

.



image source