Tag Archives: Australian politics

Australian politics live: Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemns ‘killing’ of Afghan civilians by Australian soldiers | Australian News | Instant News

The government will go to great lengths to claim credit for economic recovery, but any serious economist knows when we have a recession as deep and destructive as Australia’s, of course, the economy will recover.

Josh Frydenberg will pretend that it was his genius that saw it happen, but most economists know that from such a very low base, there will of course be a substantial recovery in quarterly GDP. I don’t think any objective observer of the way the government is implementing this stimulus would say that they are doing everything right. They don’t do everything wrong, but they also don’t have everything right.

We are calling for a wage subsidy and we are happy when the government changes its mind and brings it in, but that doesn’t mean that it has been implemented perfectly. Too many people are excluded. Too many people in the unemployed queue are being intentionally removed from jobkeepers by the government. This means that the unemployment queue is longer than it should be and we will have problems with unemployment and underemployment for longer than we would like.


image source

Charity commission alerts the Australian Conservation Foundation to Angus Taylor’s open letter | Australian News | Instant News

The Australian Charity and Nonprofit Commission has fired warning shots at the Australian Conservation Foundation, asking environmental groups to “read the guide on political advocacy immediately” and consider withdrawing open complaint letter about Angus Taylor’s lack of action on climate change.

In correspondence seen by Guardian Australia, ACNC has raised its objection to the climate change open letter to Scott Morrison published in early November on the ACF website.

The document was signed by the ACF as well as by thousands of doctors and health and medical professionals. Matter also runs as an advertisement in Australian newspapers.

The open letter brokered by the ACF urged Morrison to exclude Taylor from his emission reduction portfolio because he “failed in his ministerial duties in three critical ways”.

The three ways specified in the open letter are to continue to “allocate public money for gas and other polluting fossil fuel projects while overseeing a 50% national decline in large-scale renewable energy investment from record highs in the 2018-19 financial year”; “Failure to reduce Australia’s emissions in accordance with our international obligations”; and failing “to tie Australia to its net zero emissions target by 2050, isolating the federal government from state partners, businesses, farmers and civil society and Australia from the international community”.

The ACNC compliance division contacted the ACF in writing on November 13. The charity watchdog told ACF they were “coming [their] concern “that the organization” has engaged in activities that appear to be against political candidates “.

Guardian Australia understands that several other groups involved in drafting the open letter have also been approached by the commission.

ACNC told ACF: “While a registered charity can advocate for issues related to its charitable goals, it cannot aim to promote or oppose a political party or candidate.

“It’s not limited to candidates during the election period – this includes current lawmakers.”

The ACF has rejected the assessment and told the commission that there is no justifiable basis for repeal the open letter on climate change.

The ACF chief executive, Kelly O’Shanassy, ​​had told the commission that the open letter was entirely “an exercise in advocacy to advance the ACF’s charitable cause”.

O’Shanassy pointed out that ACF is a registered charity for the advancement of the natural environment.

“The ACF regularly conducts advocacy related to climate change and, in particular, prevents catastrophic climate change on a scale that will destroy rather than protect our natural environment,” the ACF chair said in a letter returning to the commission on 27 November.

“As a charity for the advancement of the natural environment, it is of course very appropriate for the ACF to provide public comment on whether the minister for emissions reductions is successful in reducing Australia’s harmful greenhouse gas emissions.

“All such comments are completely in line with our charitable cause.”

The ACF noted the open letter did not mention any political parties, and it indicated that Taylor was a sitting MP, not a candidate for political office.

“In calling for minister Taylor to be removed from his ministerial post, the ACF has made no comment on whether he should remain a member of parliament,” O’Shanassy said, adding the letter “relates only to minister Taylor’s role as emission minister.”

ACF said it believes it fully complies with the requirements.

However the commission has warned the ACF “the right to register as a charity is based on continued compliance with obligations under the Australian Charities and Non-Profit Commission Act 2012 (ACNC Act) and the Australian Charities and Non-Profit Commission Act 2013 Regulations (Regulations) .

“The Australian Conservation Foundation Incorporated must ensure its activities advance its charitable goals and that boards exercise their powers and obligations with the reasonable care expected of them.”

Charities are allowed to take part in public debate, and oppose or support government policies, laws, or practices, as long as it is relevant to their charitable cause. But they are not allowed to directly promote or oppose political parties or candidates running for office.

Commission publicly warned in 2017 it will crack down on inappropriate political advocacy in the sector, citing a growing number of complaints about charities – benefiting from significant tax concessions – engaging in political advocacy. Reports on that year found that Australian charities shun political advocacy and “silence themselves” for fear that dissent will attract political retribution.

The ACF has been audited by the commission during the electoral cycle but complaints about open mail are unusual.

O’Shanassy has responded to the organization’s request to read political advocacy guidelines by saying: “Thank you for your recommendation that the ACF should familiarize itself with ACNC’s guidelines on political advocacy.

“The board and staff are aware of this publication and have benefited greatly from it. We remain focused on these important issues, consistent with the good governance practices of the ACF. “


image source

How innovation and immigration will save the economy and climate – live podcast of Australian politics | Australian News | Instant News

This week’s political editor Katharine Murphy spoke with frontbencher Victoria Clare O’Neil about the Labor Party’s vision for the Australian workforce. With growing issues including low wage growth, a performing economy and underpayments, how has the government changed the direction of policy during Covid? What major changes are needed to boost innovation, immigration and the climate?

How to listen to podcasts: everything you need to know


image source

Queensland opens borders to Victoria – as it did. | Australian News | Instant News

It will be a significant victory for the country Mathias Cormann can achieve, for us to have influence in the OECD, especially in the recovery period after the Covid-19 virus, for the next five to 10 years.

The world economy … will have an important impact on Australians, and for someone as successful and trusted as Mathias Cormann to become head of that organization, to speak to the knowledge he has gained as an Australian. the most successful finance minister, I think it will be a big win for Australia and something we should be proud of.

But there are always costs associated with visiting and lobbying to get the votes needed to take the position, and I hope he does well because that will be a great outcome for Australia.


image source

The use of handcuffs in Australia on asylum seekers is inhuman and illegal, says lawyers Australian News | Instant News

The use of handcuffs in Australia to transfer asylum seekers to medical appointments is unlawful, inhuman, traumatic and illegally restricts access to health care, especially for those with a history of mental illness and torture, according to a landmark new case.

The Public Interest Advocacy Center on Monday launched a trial case in federal court on behalf of the asylum seeker, under the pseudonym Yasir, challenging the legality of using handcuffs when transferring those in immigration detention to and from medical appointments.

The case accuses the practice of breaking the law under both Migration Disability Discrimination Ordinances and Ordinances.

The use of restraint has come under criticism from both Australian Human Rights Commission and Commonwealth Ombudsman, which had warned that mechanical strength and restraint were used indiscriminately, in a manner disproportionate to the risks, and as a first-rather than a last resort.

For asylum seekers like Yasir, who has spent seven years in detention, the use of handcuffs can be very traumatic.

Yasir has been diagnosed with a mental illness and told the Guardian he has a history of childhood abuse and abuse.

Despite this, he said he was often handcuffed to attend medical appointments, for no reason.

PIAC has accused, on several occasions, the prospect of handcuffs being sufficient to confiscate Yasir.

“It happened to me so many times, I can’t count it,” Yasir told the Guardian. “I have been in immigration detention for over seven years now and I worry about threats of handcuffs every day. They never told me why I needed to be handcuffed. “

“I can never forget the things that happened to me as a child prisoner. I fled to Australia to seek refuge but detention was a new nightmare when I arrived here. Being constantly handcuffed here further ruined my mind. “

Data on the use of handcuffs in immigration detention are not available, and the Ministry of Home Affairs did not respond to questions about the practice.

But freedom of information documents released in 2017 show the use of force, which includes the use of restraint, has skyrocketed in ground detention, nearly doubling in about nine months.

PIAC said the land detention system – where about 50% of the population are asylum seekers – has been marked by significant militarization and an increasingly punishing culture since it was taken over by the Australian Border Force in 2015.

The center’s chief executive, Jonathon Hunyor, said the system not only worsened the mental health of some prisoners, but also denied them proper access to basic health services. PIAC accuses such acts of assault and constitutes a form of disability discrimination, and wants the practice to be used only as it is intended to be used: as a last resort.

“We choose to lock up people who have not committed crimes and then, frankly, we torture them,” Hunyor told the Guardian. This case actually reveals it in quite gruesome detail.

“We know that this is a group of people who tend to have pre-existing mental and health conditions, a history of torture and trauma is certainly not uncommon. And we detain people for very long periods of time, which we know causes mental health conditions and general ill health. “

“So in those circumstances, using excessive force within the center, between centers, and getting people to and from medical appointments, really makes things worse.”

Jane Leibowitz, senior attorney at the PIAC asylum seekers health rights project, says there are humane and effective alternatives to handcuffs and belts.

“Increasingly, we see vulnerable, sick and cooperative asylum seekers being subjected to dangerous and degrading practices that result in significant delays and disruptions to medical care,” said Leibowitz.

The department was approached for comment.

The PIAC case received financial support from the Grata Fund, which supported legal cases in the public interest.


image source