Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan approved the creation of a National Intelligence Coordinating Committee (NICC), said the senior security source.
The new agency will be headed by the director general of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), who will serve as its chairman, Dawn reported on Tuesday.
Intelligence services have held at least two rounds of discussions on the issue after the proposal was submitted to the prime minister for approval. It is hoped that the first coordination body meeting can be held as early as next week.
“Even though there has been discussion about the formation of the coordination forum, the terms of reference and mode of operation will be decided upon formally,” said the source.
The NICC will serve as a mechanism to coordinate the more than two dozen intelligence organizations in the country. The National Counter-Terrorism Authority will also be part of the new structure.
The move is part of a long-awaited reform of the intelligence apparatus, which aims to clarify the roles of individual agencies, improve coordination and optimize their capabilities.
One of the lessons learned by the state during the war on terrorism is that effective intelligence coordination is the weakest link in the overall effort. This results in a loss of critical time and in some cases, agencies are unable to even collect the information available to them. Moreover, this is a major obstacle to collective strategy development.
A leaked version of the Abbottabad Commission report has revealed that the commission, while noting the absence of a coordinating mechanism for civilian-military intelligence, has also proposed the creation of a body on the line of the US Department of Homeland Security to synergize the work of major spies. institutions in the country.
The Abbottabad Commission was set up to investigate the circumstances surrounding the murder of Osama bin Laden in a US attack on a compound in Abbottabad in 2011. Although, the report has not been officially opened, it is reported to have made 32 broad recommendations to address the issue. identified during his investigations based on testimony from key civilian and military officials; intel coordination is one of them.
In the past there have been many attempts to develop this coordination, but little progress has been made due to differences in the leadership of the new body, which have now been resolved.
On July 26, 2008, the then People’s Party government even announced the placing of the ISI and IB under the Ministry of Interior’s “administrative, financial and operational control”. However, the decision was overturned within 24 hours due to a strong reservation from one of the organizations.
Similar efforts were made during the PML-N administration, when Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan headed the interior ministry.
(Only the title and image of this report may have been reworked by Business Standards staff; other content was generated automatically from syndicated feeds.)
Business Standard always strives to provide up-to-date information and comments on developments that interest you and have broader political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your constant encouragement and feedback on how to improve our offering only makes our determination and commitment to this ideal even stronger. Even during these difficult times arising from Covid-19, we continue to be committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on issues of topical relevance. We do, however, have a request.
As we combat the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so we can continue to offer better quality content. Our subscription model has received encouraging responses from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscriptions to our online content can only help us achieve our goal of offering better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practice the journalism to which we are committed.
Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Saturday lashed out at the former prime minister three times Nawaz Sharif for accusing the military commander of rigging the election and installing a “puppet government” in Islamabad.
Sharif, the leader is 70 years old Pakistan The Muslim League (Nawaz), which was ousted from power in 2017 by the high court on corruption charges, on Friday for the first time directly appointed Army Commander General Qamar Javed Bajwa and ISI chief Lt. Gen. Faiz Hameed for meddling in the 2018 elections to ensure victory. Imran Khan.
In response to Sharif, Khan said on Saturday that the PML-N supremo came into politics “polishing General Zia’s shoes” in reference to Sharif joining politics in the 1980s during dictator General Zia-ul Haq’s martial law.
Khan said Sharif chose to use negative language against army leadership at a time when soldiers sacrificed their lives for the nation.
“Why are they sacrificing their lives? For us; for the country. And the wolf running with its tail between its legs uses such language for the military commander and the DG of the ISI,” said Khan.
The strong army, who has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its more than 70 years of existence, until now it has held considerable power in security matters and foreign policy.
Khan said Sharif took “crores” rupees from Meeran Bank in the late 1980s to fight elections against Benazir Bhutto of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP).
“This is the person who twice threw (PPP deputy chairman Asif Ali) Zardari into prison. Zardari was the one who instituted the Hudaibiya Paper Factory case against him (Syarif), not General Bajwa,” said Khan.
Commenting on the opposition party rally, Khan called it a “circus”.
He also targeted PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and daughter Sharif Maryam Nawaz, saying that two “children” who had never worked for an hour in their life and lived using their father’s haram profit were making speeches.
Khan said these leaders would even sell off the country to protect their wealth which they accumulated through illegal means.
(Only the title and image of this report may have been reworked by Business Standards staff; other content was generated automatically from syndicated feeds.)
Business Standard always strives to provide up-to-date information and comments on developments that interest you and have broader political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your constant encouragement and feedback on how to improve our offering only makes our determination and commitment to this ideal even stronger. Even during these difficult times arising from Covid-19, we continue to be committed to providing you with the latest and updated information with credible news, authoritative views and incisive comments on issues of relevance. We do, however, have a request.
As we combat the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so we can continue to offer better quality content. Our subscription model has received encouraging responses from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscriptions to our online content can only help us achieve our goal of offering better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us put the journalism to which we are committed.
MELBOURNE (Reuters) – Australian batsman Matthew Wade expects Indian pacemen to use short balls when they tour Down Under but says no one will be as effective as Neil Wagner of New Zealand with the keeper.
FILE PHOTOS: Cricket – New Zealand v England – Second Test – Seddon Park, Hamilton, New Zealand – 2 December 2019 New Zealand Neil Wagner reacts REUTERS / Ross Setford
Wade was left battered and bruised after a brief attack by Wagner when New Zealand toured at home last summer and paid tribute to the fiery left winger.
“I don’t think anyone in this game has played guard bowling the way he is bowled and is very consistent, and doesn’t score when he also takes the net,” Wade told the Cricket Australia website (cricket.com.au).
“I think we will see it a little (from India) but I don’t think it will be as effective as Wagner. He did it a long time ago.
“To be honest, I’ve never faced a bowler so accurate at bowling bouncers.”
Although Wagner made the mark with 17 goals, including some of Australia’s best batsmen dismissals Steve Smith, David Warner and Marnus Labuschagne, Tim Paine’s team dominated the Black Hats to claim the 3-0 test series.
India was more successful the previous summer, becoming the first Asian team to win a series of tests in Australia with a 2-1 result.
Australia is without Smith and Warner for the series, which is being suspended for damaging the ball.
However, Indian speed attacks Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Shami, and Ishant Sharma appeared extraordinary throughout the series and demeaned the host trio enlivened by Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood on their own pitch.
Wade said Wagner’s angle and accuracy would remain difficult for India to reproduce quickly.
“He is always between your shoulders and the top of your helmet, or in your armpits,” Wade said.
“They hardly have anyone in front of goal. They have very clever fields, catchers in a good place, they try to take the goal every time, that’s not negative bowling.
“Take your hat off to him, he bends very well.”
Australia meets India in a series of four trials which begin in Brisbane on 3 December.
Reporting by Ian Ransom; Editing by Lincoln Feast.
“He is certainly the best allrounder I have ever played, and he is the best allrounder England has ever had.” – James Anderson
Ben Stokes have everyone – fans, critics, teammates – eat from his hands, and with good reason: more than that last four and a half years, he has scored eight Test hundreds and averaged 43.3 with bats. And he has used 110 wickets in 28. Even these numbers are unfair for his various skills: with a bat in hand, he has the amazing ability to go through several teeth in the same Test (Old Trafford, 2020) and even the same innings (Headingley, 2019). With the ball in hand, he made use of difficult overs and long spells as England sought a breakthrough. Add to that his field of heart and ability to be perfect team member, and it’s not surprising that England can’t be enough with him
However, for the purposes of this article, we will limit analysis to only two main skills, hitting and playing bowling. The high notes that Stokes struck as the allrounder Test over the last few years, are quite justified, evoking comparisons with allrounder greats of all time. How does the peak so far compare to the best from other allrounders? Let the numbers do the talking.
From early 2016 – when he made the highest Test score, from 258, against South Africa in Cape Town – until the end of the second Test of the home series that was just concluded against the West Indies, over the span 45 Test, there is a 15.6 difference between the average stocking and bowling punch. How does that compare to the best 45-Test lines from other allrounders? (The best 45 test in terms of the highest difference between hitting and bowling averages is considered.)
Take a cut-off of at least 1,500 running scores and 100 wickets taken in 45 of these tests – Stokes scored 3,341 runs and took 110 wickets in this match – only four allrounders out of 22 had higher average differences: Garry Sobers, Jacques Kallis, Imran Khan and Shaun Pollock. Sobers and Kallis have a slightly worse bowling average than Stokes, but are phenomenal with bats, averaging more than 70. Imran is exceptional with bats and balls in the period between September 1982 and December 1991, scored nearly 55 runs per dismissal and only conceded 20.1 runs per goal. Pollock only made the 1500-run cut-off – he scored 1561 runs in 45 Tests between January 1999 and September 2003, even though his contribution to running the team is very low, as we will see later – his bowling statistics are amazing: 185 goals at 19.9. For the top three allrounders, the average difference is more than 30, while the difference for Pollock is 20.2.
However, for all other topround tops, the difference is less than 15.6. Stokes a little ahead Keith Miller (a difference of 15.4) and Ian Botham (14.6), temporary Tony Greig and Andrew Flintoff, the other two leading British allrounders on the list, managing a difference of about ten rounds between the punch and bowling averages in their 45 best tests.
Twenty-two allrounders made cut-offs of 1500 runs and 100 wickets in their 45 best tests, and among them Richard Hadlee is in seventh place – a slot above Botham – by an average a difference of 14.8, temporary Kapil Dev, the fourth among the Fab Four allrounders in the 1980s, ranks 18th with a a difference of 4.6.
It is worth mentioning here that the statistics for these 22 players vary greatly, in terms of walking and goal. Sobers score of 4790 runs and Kallis 4372 in 45 Tests, while Pollock only scored 1561, and Wasim Akram 1506. On the other hand, Kallis only took 103 goals, and Sobers 126, compared to 253 by Hadlee, 203 by Botham, 189 by Kapil, 185 by Pollock, and 180 by Khan. While they were all broadly categorized as allrounders, their roles in their team were very different: Sobers and Kallis clearly hit allrounders, while Hadlee, Botham, Kapil and Pollock were mostly bowling allrounders.
Sobers scored 19.7% of the West Indies bat movements in these 45 Tests, Kallis contributed 18.2%, but in terms of the team’s goal percentage, Kallis only contributed 14.2% and Sobers 16.5%. Hadlee, meanwhile, only scored 10.2% of his team’s run but took a 37.9% defeat of their goal. The contribution of the Pollock bat to South African cats is very small. He only scored 7.1% of their number in 45 of these tests, which is the second lowest percentage among the 22 allrounders on this list – only Chaminda Vaas, with 7%, lower – but took 25.2% of the South African goal. The percentages for Khan are 11.9 (running) and 28.2 (goal).
For Stokes, the number is even: he has scored 14.8% of English bats, and took 14.7% of their goalposts. That basically makes him more of an allrounder batting, considering that bowling allrounders tend to take around 25% of their team’s goal. Botham, for example, took 31.2% of the England goal and scored 13.1% of their pace in his 45 best tests, between June 1978 and July 1982. Corresponding figures for Greig is 17.2% and 13.8%, and for Flintoff 22.3% of the goal and 11.8% of the runs. The scatter plot above shows where these 22 allrounders are positioned with respect to the percentage of running teams and their team’s goal contributing in their 45 Best Tests. It is clear from the plot that Stokes made greater contributions with bats than with balls. Only three of the 22 allrounders – Sobers, Kallis and Shakib Al Hasan – scored a higher percentage of their team’s play, while 19 took a higher percentage of the goal.
With Stokes, it’s just that the number of wickets does not do full justice to his contribution as a bowler. He recorded difficult overs and long spells as Britain sought a breakthrough, and which is best illustrated by this stat: 41 of 156 wickets his career had ended with more than 50-plus partnerships. The percentage of 26.3 is the highest among all the fast bowlers who have taken 100-plus wicket careers.
And here is further evidence of the effectiveness of Stokes bowling when the rest of the attack is unsuccessful. On ten occasions when he does four goals, he has an attack rate of 24.7 balls per goal; in that round, the rest of the attack strikes every 93.3 balls. The 3.8 ratio between two strike rates is the third best among all bowlers with at least ten four fors – there are 183 bowlers on the list. Only Fidel Edwards and Peter Pollock have better ratios, and then only a few. The last example is Southampton test against the West Indies, when Stokes took 4 for 49 in 14 overs in the first round while the rest of the British attack took six wickets remaining in 88 overs.
The sample size is indeed small here, but it illustrates Stokes’ ability to make things happen when his teammates don’t do it right. In bowler-friendly conditions, when Anderson, Broad and Co run through a batting line-up, Stokes sometimes doesn’t even get a bowl. The value is when things become more difficult for bowlers, and then their contribution is very valuable.
Maintaining a 40-plus average with bats and sub-30 averages with balls for a long time is rare for most explorers – most tend to slip with bats or balls – but Stokes now has sustainable line of 50 such tests: since October 2015, he has averaged 40.63 with bats and 28.69 with balls. In all Test cricket, there are only two allrounders who have maintained this statistic for more than 50 Tests: Khan (81 Tests) and Kallis (76). (This is the longest stroke for each player.)
From the seventh test to 87, Khan averaged 40.06 with bats and 22.22 with balls. Considering that his entire career took 88 tests, that meant the period in which he crossed the threshold covered 92% of his career, which was extraordinary. The longest streak for Kallis extends from hers 14 for the 89th Test, during that period he averaged 61.62 with bats, and 29.93 with balls. While an average of more than 40 with bats didn’t matter much to him, Kallis became less than a bowler later in his career and averaged more than 30, although his career bowling average remained respectable 32.65.
The Stokes line is currently 50, already two tests better than Botham. Between February 1978 and July 1982, Botham had a 48-test streak where it averaged 40.31 with bats and 23.44 with balls, but after that the batting average was below 40. Flintoff’s longest streak like that was 42 matches, temporary Greig is 37 years old. There are only eight allrounders who have a 40-plus test, included Daniel Vettori, The fifth together 48 Such tests, in front of a much bigger name.
Since the beginning of 2016, Stokes has become one of the pillars British Punch, although entry is relatively low, at No. 5 or 6: only in this period Joe Root has scored more (4612) with a slightly better average (44.77, than Stokes 43.3). Since the beginning of 2019, Stokes has become unnecessary leader on the hitter line, printing 1453 running at 53.81; no other player scored 600-plus scores with an average of 40-plus in this period.
The value of Stokes in the arrangement of strokes is very large in a situation when England had lost the wicket relatively early and needed a lower middle order to lift the team to a reasonable amount. With his ability to block or attack according to the demands of the situation, Stokes has a game to eliminate dangerous bowling spells, and then attack and score a fast run in a lower order. When hit on No. 5 or lower since the beginning of 2016, he has played 34 innings when England have made a total of 300-plus; in that round, he had scored 2004, which means 14.9% of England. That is the highest percentage of runs scored by any English batsman in fifth or lower, in the 34 rounds when the team has scored 300 or more. The percentage is slightly higher than the best 34-inning sequence Graham Thorpe, Paul Collingwood, Botham and Ian Bell. In short, illustrates the importance of Stokes in the middle to lower order.
Through this article, the current peak of Stokes has been compared to the all-time peak of a retired legend, which is a little unfair for Stokes because he tends to increase in height – or at least maintain his current form – over the next few years. year. If he manages to overcome it, a similar analysis in a few years can see him higher in the list of the greatest allrounders of all time.
The former captain of the Indian World Cup winner, Kapil Dev It was recently stated in the podcast that he is a better athlete than people like Imran Khan, sir Ian Botham and Sir Richard Hadlee.
Kapil Dev was a member of the all-round legendary quartet who dominated cricket during the 1970s and 80s. He also leads India for the inaugural World Cup crown in the 1983 edition.
Kapil Dev admitted that although he was not the greatest athlete, he was certainly the best of the four. The 61-year-old then praised the extraordinary abilities of the three others, calling Sir Richard Hadlee the best bowler player and Imran Khan as the most diligent player among the quartet.
“The best bowling ball belongs to Richard Hadlee – he’s like a computer between the four of us. “I wouldn’t say Imran Khan is the best or most natural athlete, but he is the most diligent player we have ever seen,” Kapil Dev said.
Imran Khan looked like an ordinary bowler early in his career: Kapil Dev
“When he started, he looked like an ordinary bowler, but then he became a very diligent bowler and he taught himself. And then he does the punch too. Imran can run through [opposition] team, but his ability as a leader is much better. “To control the Pakistani team that he has is a challenge,” quipped Kapil Dev.
Kapil Dev also highly praised Sir Ian Botham’s all-round prowess, calling him a versatile one, who could win his own matches, both with sticks and balls.
“Ian Botham is really versatile – under certain conditions, he can win the match himself. I would not say Hadlee was the best hitter. Botham can do damage to the opposition both with bats [and ball], “Kapil Dev explained.
Kapil Dev represented India in 356 internationally, scalping 687 prey and collecting 9,031 runs.