Tag Archives: Domestic violence

In regional Australia, many victims of domestic violence do not have a ‘destination’ | Instant News


Grace Holton may only be 17 years old, but she is determined to make a difference for Australians affected by domestic violence.

Grace’s mother, Jessica Kupsch, was brutally murdered by her partner in 2012.

Matthew Patrick Tunks is serving a 23-year prison sentence for murdering Kupsch, his de-facto partner, in a hotel room in Launceston in northern Tasmania.

Grace and her three siblings now live with their grandmother and legal guardian, Donna Kupsch, who says she has been a strong advocate for them.

“That’s all I can do,” said Kupsch.

Ms Kupsch is also helping victims of domestic violence across the country to get help and is pleased that awareness of the issue is growing.

“Whenever we celebrate Red Rose Day [raising awareness of domestic or family violence-related deaths] for my daughter more and more people are coming and it’s great that they have had enough, “said Donna Kupsch.

Ms Kupsch would approach the women herself to check if they were okay, something she did recently when she saw a woman with black eyes in a supermarket.

“I said ‘don’t come back’, he said ‘no, I’m not this time’.

“I said ‘how many times have you gone’, he said ‘five.’ Usually around seven they will either hurt you or kill you.”

He also wanted others to come forward.

“Just imagine yourself in that position … you just hope someone will come up to you and ask ‘do you need help, are you all right?’ That’s all you can do. “

Domestic violence support services are scattered in various regions

Donna Kupsch said she believes awareness is increasing, but more support is needed.(

ABC News: Doll Champ

)

According to federal government figures, 23 percent of women in Australian territory experience intimate partner violence, compared to 15 percent in cities.

In Launceston, where the Donna Kupsch family lives, Tasmanian Police were called in to deal with 900 domestic violence incidents last year – the highest number of all local government areas in the state.

Support services say that’s only part of the story.

Their data shows about 70 percent of victims who have recently sought direct support are seeking help, not the police, for help.

Ms Kupsch said it was a positive sign that the number of police calls was increasing because it meant more victims were seeking support, but she said more work was needed.

Grace said girls her age were not immune from the problem and a shortage of housing caused problems.

“There are a lot of people out there right now with problems with boys and such, and what happens if they need to go somewhere and they can’t?”

‘Our hands were tied’: The victims had nowhere to go

Crisis accommodation shelters in large parts of Australia are struggling to keep up with demand.

Rachael Robertson, a lawyer for West NSW Community Legal Service in Dubbo, said women were forced to move “hundreds of kilometers away” or live in violent households, because there were not enough long-term accommodation options.

“Housing is by far the biggest problem we face here and one of the reasons why women don’t leave violent relationships [is] because of housing uncertainty, “said Ms Robertson.

“I have a number of clients who say I would rather stay there with him because he would only hurt me, but at least the kids still have a roof over their heads, and they have to go home somewhere.

“There needs to be some specialist housing which is emergency or crisis accommodation [for] more than a few nights. “

Kristy Staples, regional manager of the Salvation Army’s Western Australia domestic violence service, said Karratha Women’s Protection had rejected 80 percent of victims who needed support in recent months.

Ms Staples said the shelter can only accommodate four women and the Western Australian housing crisis has exacerbated the situation.

“We have less than 1 percent rental availability at the moment and it’s a bidding war,” he said.

“For many women, it’s actually easier to stay in a relationship at home, especially if there are kids involved, than to take them off and where to go?”

Regional and rural shelters face confidentiality issues

Mary Knowles, Mayor of Tasmania’s Northern Midlands, is a domestic violence survivor.

Cr Knowles fled abusive relationships in the Victorian region in the 1980s and moved to Tasmania for a more quiet life, but the domestic violence situation in his town has worsened.

A woman sits on a veranda overlooking farmland and bush, holding a cup of tea and printed documents.
Mary Knowles says each local government area needs its own Neighborhood Home.(

ABC News: Doll Champ

)

According to Tasmanian Police, the Northern Midlands has seen a 58 percent increase in calls about domestic violence since 2017. The neighboring Southern Midlands saw a 116 percent increase in calls over the same period.

Cr Knowles has long asked central Tasmania to have its own women’s shelters, but police and some support services have raised concerns about how rural shelters can remain secret.

She has now called for Ward Homes to be established in all local municipal councils to provide better support to victims of domestic violence.

“We really think that the Neighbors are an excellent safe opportunity for rural women in particular to be able to access the services they might need or the information they might need to get to a safer place,” said Cr Knowles.

The Australian Institute of Criminology’s research manager Hayley Boxhall said the situation in regional and rural areas was unique.

“So for those women, how do we provide them with a service that doesn’t require them to make public reports?”

‘We all have a responsibility to change culture’

Discussions in the community about domestic and sexual violence are encouraging more victims to seek help, said Tasmania Women’s Legal Service chief executive Yvette Cehtel.

Ms Cehtel said the service has seen a 50 percent increase in clients seeking support in the past year.

A woman sitting in an office holding some papers
Yvette Cehtel says community conversations about domestic violence are encouraging more women to seek support.(

ABC News: Doll Champ

)

“We’re all seeing more clients and more requests for our services, but not everyone feels comfortable calling the police,” said Cehtel.

“I think it’s very important for us to respect that.

“For us, it’s about empowering our clients, so that means sitting down with women and helping them make the best decisions about how the problem continues.”

The service is also starting to test new initiatives, including creating podcasts with freelance journalists and holding free community workshops, to help the public understand what domestic violence really looks like and how observers can call it.

“People are still very fixated on what physical or sexual violence looks like and I think we still have a long way to go to talk about other aspects,” said Cehtel.

“I mean spiritual and cultural isolation, emotional, verbal, financial and social.

.



image source

Men open fire to kill his wife in Karachi, police launch investigation | Instant News


KARACHI: In a gruesome incident of domestic violence, a man on Friday killed his wife after shooting at her in an area of ​​the city of Surjani, ARY NEWS reported.

According to police, the incident took place in sector 7-B of Surjani City when a man identified as Karim opened fire on his wife. “The woman died on the spot in the incident,” they said adding that the body was transferred to the hospital for medical-legal formalities.

The defendants were able to flee from the scene because the police said they had investigated the motive behind the murder as well as forming a search team to catch the culprit.

In a similar incident on 27 September, a man killed himself after killing his wife over a household dispute in Lahore.

Lahore police when leaking details of the incident said that two bodies were found from outside a house in the Gulshan-e-Ravi township area.

The victims were identified as Shakeela Kafil and Kafil Babar. It is revealed during the investigation that Kafil shot at his wife Shakeela and then shot himself in the head to commit suicide.

Read more: Husband and wife murdered in the name of honor in Karachi

The police, who initially called it an incident over domestic strife, said they were further investigating the matter from all angles.

“We have transferred the body to the hospital for medico-legal formalities in addition to collecting the cartridges to confirm initial findings,” they said. the word.

Comment

comment

.



image source

Update to COVID-19 Direction 19 December 2020, South Australia | Instant News


Today’s updates have been made to the Guidelines for Cross-Border Travel and Elderly Care in Housing.

On 18 December 2020, three COVID-19 Directives were updated in South Australia in response to the recent New South Wales COVID-19 outbreak. Today’s updates have been made to the Guidelines for Cross-Border Travel and Elderly Care in Housing. This update provides changes to the previous date of ’11 December’ and replaces it with ‘the relevant date’. This is to ensure that if there are further Community High Transmission Zones or Restricted Locations they are captured under this directive with test and quarantine requirements. Updates have also been made to the Guidelines for Cross-Border Travel clarifying quarantine requirements for travelers from the High Community Transmission Zone.

Everyone traveling from New South Wales should read the following information. Please note that the release below contains much of the same information with updated details for a holistic look.

Direction of Travel Cross-Border No 24

The Cross Border No 24 Direction will take effect from 5:20 p.m. on Saturday 19 December 2020.

The changes are as follows:

  • Forbidden Locations has been added to Directions, these are the places in New South Wales designated by SA Health at the following website: www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/covidcontacttracing
    • Persons who have been physically present at Restricted Locations on the relevant date specified on the SA Health website are not permitted to enter South Australia (exceptions apply to Essential Traveler approved under Schedule 1, a person fleeing domestic violence or a person who moved to live in South Australia)
    • Persons (including children) physically present at the Restricted Locations on the relevant date specified on the SA Health website located in South Australia must carry out quarantine at the place designated by the official from the day of arrival. Caregivers of minors must also be quarantined.
    • The aforementioned persons must receive a 24-hour COVID-19 test, on the 5th and 12th day of arrival in South Australia.
    • At the time of publication SA Health had identified Prohibited Locations as: Avalon Bowlo (bowling club) and Avalon Beach RSL Club.
  • The High Community Transmission Zone has been added to the Direction, these are local and suburban government areas in New South Wales designated by SA Health as high community transmission zones on the following website: www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/covidcontacttracing
    • Persons physically present in the High Community Transmission Zone on the relevant date specified on the SA Health website must self-quarantine for 14 days, excluding the day of arrival in South Australia or if they have been present within the remaining 14 day period from the last day they are present in the zone. Exceptions apply to people traveling by vehicle through the Higher Community zone and not leaving the vehicle while in the zone and wearing a mask for the entire journey if using public transportation, or Important Travelers approved under Schedule 1.
    • The above mentioned persons must receive the COVID-19 test 24 hours, on the 5th day and on the 12th day after arriving in South Australia.
    • A person who is obliged to self-quarantine must travel to the place of quarantine in the most direct and practical manner, reside and remain there during the self-quarantine period and remain separate from others. They must remain in place unless they receive medical care and / or supplies, COVID-19 testing, emergency situations or other reasons as determined by the Country Coordinator. The person must take all reasonable steps to ensure that no one else enters the premises unless the other person is also self-quarantining, submitting emergency applications, providing / receiving treatment or they normally live in the premises. If self-quarantine is a short-term accommodation facility, they must inform the operator that they are self-quarantining.
    • At the time of publication SA Health had identified the High Community Transmission Zone as: Northern Beaches Council and the suburbs of Penrith and Lavender Bay.
  • Important Tourist is available to those arriving from overseas, Restricted Locations, and High Community Transmission Zones only. All Essential Travelers must register via the Cross Border Travel Registration and must be approved before entering South Australia. https://www.police.sa.gov.au/online-services/cross-border-travel-application
    • If someone is no longer an Essential Traveler, they must complete the remaining quarantine period.
    • The Essential Traveler category remains largely unchanged but has been updated to include compassionate reasons with the prior approval of SA Health, specialist workers in key and passing sectors. For a complete list of categories and definitions, please see Schedule 1 of Transboundary Travel Direction No. 23.

Residential Elderly Care Facilities Directive No 19

Residential Elderly Care Facilities Directive No. 19 will take effect at 5:25 p.m. on Saturday 19 December 2020.

The only changes to the Residential Elderly Care Facility Directive are:

  • The inclusion of the High Community Transmission Zone which is a local government and suburban area in New South Wales designated by SA Health as a high community transmission zone on the following website: www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/covidcontacttracing
  • People from the High Community Transmission Zone are not allowed to enter the elderly care facilities.

Other requirements remain. The information above only highlights the key changes made to the Directions and does not reflect all requirements. Community members are encouraged to view the complete Guide for more information.

Emergency Management Directive (Cross-Border Travel No 23) (COVID-19) 2020 has been revoked and replaced with an Emergency Management Directive (Cross-Border Travel No 24) (COVID-19) 2020. Emergency Management (Residential Elderly Care Facility No 18) (COVID-19) -19) Directives have been revoked and replaced with Emergency Management Directives (Residential Elderly Care Facility No 19) (COVID-19).

All available directions, frequently asked questions (FAQs), and other information can be found here: https://www.covid-19.sa.gov.au/emergency-declarations

If you need more information you can call the SA COVID-19 Information Line on 1800 253 787 between 9am and 5pm 7 days a week or go to the SA Health website at www.sahealth.sa.gov.au or www.sa.gov.au/covid-19

/ Public Release. Material in this public release comes from the original organization and may be point-in-time, edited for clarity, style and length. view more here.

.



image source

‘Ending a Heartbreaking Life’: Alleged Deaths Due to Domestic Violence in Australia in 2020 | Australian News | Instant News


This is a list of women who have died in Australia this year in a domestic setting or allegedly at the hands of someone they know.

The deaths of some of the victims identified below are still under investigation and many of these cases are currently in active criminal proceedings which means we cannot conclusively state that they are victims of domestic violence.

According to The Counting Dead Women Project by anti-sexism groups Destroy the Joint, which counts all female victims of violence, domestic or otherwise, at least 48 women have died in 2020

.



image source

Decades of crisis: the struggle to repair Australia’s ‘broken’ family law system | Law | Instant News


AAmid a two-year scramble to reform Australia’s family law system, which has been bent under so much work that several judges have handled more than 600 cases, the parade of desperate and troubled people through the courts continues.

In New South Wales, a young girl separating live lizards in child care said she had been sexually abused by her father and grandfather; in Queensland, an overworked judge took seven years to reach a decision; Aboriginal children excluded by authorities from victims of family violence in Western Australia are experiencing reunification delays because the family courts that handle the stack of cases will not sit in the area for months.

“The level of violence in WA’s regional Aboriginal community is very important,” the chief executive of the Aboriginal Family Legal Service, Corina Martin, wrote in a Senate inquiry last month.

“The department… often excludes children from both parents even though the victim’s parents are also protective parents.

“The current status of children transferred by the department is disproportionate between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children… this is shown most clearly in the Kimberley where 100% of children treated are… Aboriginal.”

Crisis that occurred for decades

The contemporary crisis engulfing Australia’s family law system goes back decades, dating back to the disputes in the 1990s between attorney general Daryl Williams and then chief judge of the family court, Alastair Nicholson.

Nicholson wanted more resources to increase efficiency in the system. Williams felt it was too expensive, given some relatively straightforward family law issues. The pair clashed repeatedly.

“Finally Williams basically said ‘okay, I’m going to have another trial’,” recalled a senior family law attorney this week.

Two decades later, the federal government is again proposing reforms related to family law amid a massive backlog of cases.

In 2018, the Morrison government announced plans to overturn the family court and merge it with a federal district court, which was established under Williams in 2000 as a federal judge court.

Mobile courts handle a wide range of issues, including less complex family law cases, and the government believes that removing family courts will create efficiency by improving court processes and encouraging early dispute resolution.

“The need for court reform that addresses family matters has been recognized for more than a decade,” the attorney general, Christian Porter, to the Australian Guardian.

“This is an area that needs urgent reforms to improve the system for all involved, especially for families who must be able to rely on the courts to help them resolve matters at the end of the relationship as quickly, efficiently and as at the lowest possible cost. “

Labor opposes change, believing it is part of an ideological war by the government to dismantle a court system it never supported.








Anthony Albanese at a press conference about the family court investigation in September 2019. Labor is in conflict with the Coalition’s planned changes. Photo: Tracey Nearmy / Getty Images

The Australian Law Council, which has also opposed Williams’ reforms, has also strongly opposed the changes. So are other legal groups, including the Australian Women’s Legal Service, the Australian Community Law Center, and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service.

Rather than repeal family courts, federal county courts must leave, they said.

“What the bill proposes is not simple appointments and changes, co-badging or a continuation of the status quo,” Law Council president Pauline Wright told a Senate committee last month.

“They will dismantle the world’s leading institutions, undermine specialization in the system to the detriment of children and families of those who are most vulnerable.

“There is no doubt that Australia’s family law system is not functioning as it should, but this merger proposal is not the answer.”

The former family court judge Nahum Mushin, who served for more than two decades until 2011, believes failure to defend the family court will fundamentally damage society.

“There is so much family law about power imbalances, and it speaks to areas of family violence and child abuse that are fundamental not only to the legal system but to the whole society.

“If you eliminate family law, you are reducing those principles.”

A decision on reform is expected by the end of this year, two years after it takes effect.

The government and interest groups agree that family law issues are among the most complex and troubling in the legal system and must be handled more efficiently.

Federal county courts handle less complex matters than family courts, but try harder. If an issue is deemed too complex – thresholds vary between states, and can be relatively informal, but can include whether a third party is involved in a property dispute, or the estimated duration of the final hearing – it will be heard in family court.

Judges ‘drowned’ under the high volume of cases

David Pringle, chief executive and principal registrar of family courts and federal county courts, told a Senate committee last week that the average number of cases across federal county court judges was 337.

Twenty-seven judges had more than 400 cases, five judges had more than 500, and two judges had more than 600. The most overloaded judges had 659 cases in their lawsuit.

“The volume of work is just devastating for very hard-working federal court judges,” said the chairman of the Victorian family bar association board, Geoffrey Dickson ,.

“And they drowned. They drowned. “

While merit is important for all court matters, there is a certain sting to the delays felt by those in the family court system.

“Almost all family law cases are that procrastination is always right for someone,” says Dickson.

“There’s always someone waiting for a check or someone waiting for more time with the kids, and someone who likes being in a position on hold.”





Australian Family Court in Sydney



The former judge at the Nahum Mushin family court believes failure to defend the courts will fundamentally damage society. Photo: Takatoshi Kurikawa / Alamy

Dickson believes that more effective case sorting, aided by the recruitment of more family law specialists in judge and registrar positions, and the increased use of arbitration, will accelerate family law problems.

“Anything that gets people listening faster and cheaper is a good thing, and any model you have will come under fire.”

There have been some difficulties in reforming the courts as Dickson suggests, including convincing the strongest family attorneys, who may have lucrative careers as attorneys, to take relatively low-paying positions in federal district courts.

Covid-19 is an additional burden

It is also clear that although this is a federal court system, different states have different problems, some of them cultural and historical, to consider.

Victoria’s problems, for example, are more likely to be resolved, whereas in New South Wales they are more likely to go to court. NSW also has greater case savings than Victoria in both courts, but does not have the individual caseload on certain judges experienced in remote parts of Australia, such as north Queensland. WA experts believe that up to 90% of cases filed before family courts in the state involve family violence, far more than the national average of around 70%.

Covid-19 has added further complexity. The courts, and those working on them, agree that they have generally handled fairly well in pushing cases.

But in Victoria, for example, that means family courts now have relatively little work to do, and therefore the threshold for when issues can be raised from federal district courts has been lowered. More inter-court transfers create more problems: a lawyer who spoke to Guardian Australia said the matter was raised five months ago, and he still hasn’t received a trial date in the family court.

The bigger burdens of Covid-19 could come to the horizon – a wave of couples stressed by the pandemic’s unique stress is expected to find their way to justice over the next year.

Academic and advocate Liana Papoutsis, who is a victim of family violence who has gone through family courts, said that a “broken” system will not only be inundated with new cases, but also the turmoil of previously resolved issues.

“Perpetrators are very malleable, they flow like water into the cracks and crevices they can enter.





A common sight of a nearly empty street during Melbourne's strict Covid ban



A wave of couples stressed by the unique pressures of the Covid pandemic are expected to find their way to justice over the next year. Photo: Anadolu Agency / Getty Images

“Covid has given them more food to increase … abuse.”

Attorney General, who spent the start of the week answering questions about his personal behavior and his family values ​​at revival of the Four Corners program, concluding by announcing the appointment of new judges to federal and family courts.

Next Friday, the Senate’s standing committee on legal and constitutional affairs will deliver its report following a year-long investigation into a proposal to merge the courts.

Porter’s office will not consider whether, after looking at the committee’s report, the bill will be passed before the end of the year. But there is a time to do it.

“There is a need to improve this system for the families that need it, now more than ever the pressure Covid-19 is putting on Australian families.”

.



image source