Tag Archives: events

COVID-19 IN BC on transit issues of air travel, Bravo, British Columbia | Instant News

In accordance with the new figures in recent weeks the number of new cases confirmed today (16 July) has remained above 20.

Before today, B. S. COVID-19 update, B. C. provincial health Advisor Dr. Bonnie Henry published the results of a study which confirmed that the province was effective in reducing the spread of the virus.

Meanwhile, the B. C. coroners service has released their illicit drug report for June. As in may, the province recorded a record number of deaths of 175 people were killed in June.

Dr. Henry said that about 80 percent of men aged 19 to 49; two-thirds died in their own home, often alone; and, in most cases, their relatives do not know about their drug.

“This is a tragedy for all of us,” said Dr. Henry deaths and the ongoing crisis that other public health emergencies occur in the province, in addition to the pandemic.

More coverage of this topic will appear soon Georgia Straight article.

Dr. Henry announced today that there are 21 new COVID-19 cases (18 people who tested positive and three EPI-the episode).

Provincial cumulative total of 3,170 cases were confirmed during a pandemic, including 1,028 cases in Vancouver coastal health; 1,667 in Fraser health; 136 Island city health; 223 in interior health; 65 in the Northern health; and 51 people who live outside of Canada.

There are 192 active cases, including 15 patients in the hospital (three of them in intensive care).

Without any new outbreaks of health care remain the three active outbreaks in two long-term institutions and in acute care. Flash health participating 655 cases, including 400 residents and 255 employees.

There are no new outbreaks of community.

Dr. Henry said that there are now 27 cases related to the incidents of exposure of Kelowna, which took place from 25 June to 6 July. In those cases, 18 cases of domestic health care, while nine of the Vancouver coastal health and the regions of Fraser health.

In addition, there are now four cases is associated with active flash community on crazy cherry farm in Oliver.

Once again, the good news is that there are no new deaths. The total number of deaths remains at 189 deaths.

A total of 2,789 people have already recovered.

Dr. Danuta Skowronski
S. B. centre for control and prevention of diseases

This morning, Dr. Henry presented the results of research antibodies, held in the province, which began in January and February.

This research was conducted jointly with S. B. Centre for disease control (bccdc site), BLC, and Lifelabs, and participates serology tests.

Unlike tests used to determine if the person is currently infected COVID-19, serological tests are used for people who have been infected in the past, have since recovered, and had developed the antibodies (produced by the immune system in response to the virus).

Dr. Henry explained that it takes two to six weeks for people to develop antibodies after infection.

“The reality is that they [antibody tests] not reliable, and therefore, you should wait at least a month after the bulk of infections to have a good understanding of what happened in your community,” she said.

She said that the report is the first of its kind issued in Canada, and that such information is difficult to obtain.

The results, she explained, will help them understand the impact of the virus on British Columbia, informing them how many people could be infected in the past, especially in March when hundreds of British Columbia residents returning from abroad, the tests were not available in all areas and criteria COVID-19 test was narrowed to high-risk groups.

She said that they have collected 1000 samples in labs across the plain, which is the most “high-risk area in the province” and in most cases, and conducted testing in two different time periods (March-may), to take “snapshots” of the virus.

Although this study does not account for long-term care facility, she said that the results cover 10 age groups.

Dr. Henry said that the results show that less than one percent of people estimated to have been infected in B. C. (She said that similar studies in other countries showed 11% in Spain and 14% in new York, during certain time periods.)

Accordingly, Dr. Danuta Skowronski on the bccdc website said that less than one in 100 residents in the lower mainland was infected during the first wave, and these results reinforce previous findings of the observation. She said that’s why the community rates of infection elsewhere in the province will be even lower.

Thus, Dr. Henry said that about eight times more people than those who are likely positive result was a virus in the province.

Doctor of medical Sciences the doctor said that the results that it does not expect to be so low, was “pleasant, happy surprise” and that we “did better than we expected.”

“A big “Bravo” to British Columbia,” she said. “They mean success in the containment of SARS-cov-2 [the virus that causes COVID-19] in our communities, whereas in other areas, as you know, was much more substantial transmission of the virus.”

Although it welcomes the efforts that everyone has contributed, she added that in British Columbia we need to continue precautions because the virus is still present.

“The downside of this is that we cannot rest on our laurels,” she said. “We can’t assume that we are all clear, because it also means that there is still significant residual susceptibility of the population.”

While Dr. Henry says that instead to do further random serological testing in the General population, she said that they are looking for how to do a more targeted test to determine who was “most affected by the virus over the last few months,”such as specific occupations, ethnic groups, socioeconomic groups or geographic groups according to the results of the provincial online survey results.

Dr. Henry explained that researchers still do not know, but if a person becomes immune to the coronavirus if they have antibodies and how long, if a person has antibodies, which is still being studied.

Minister S. B. Health Adrian Dix
British Columbia

As previously reported, today, more than four flights in BC was confirmed how do they relate to COVID-19 cases.

Dr. Henry has expanded on what she said earlier about the lack of useful information provided by the health care team from airlines about passengers.

She said that the Manifesto flight information (documents, passenger lists) have long lacked the information that will help you track and communicate with people who might have contact with the virus.

To help, she explained, if the airline took the names of passengers, phone numbers, and addresses.

“The address is very important because it helps us understand where we need to find these people, ‘ she said, and if we can do that facilitates our ability to find people quickly and to stop the chain of transmission, and this in turn makes air travel safer.”

She said that the airlines could implement a system, such as food products and establishments, beverages doing, by appointment contact information of all guests.

Meanwhile, she was asked about whether or not to wear a mask should be applied on the way.

“I think that all transit should be in the mask—all who can,” she began, before explaining that compliance with the wearing of masks is a problem, as there was “the sad events associated with people, making it a problem.”

She added that it can be difficult to distinguish between who is and is not able to wear the mask for various reasons.

However, to dispel any misunderstanding or misinformation about the masks, she explained that the masks are safe to wear.

“They will not cause you to become hypoxic [a condition caused by deprivation of oxygen]; they do not increase the risk of saving a virus or bacteria or other things; they do not aggravate asthma or other lung diseases,” said she.

She added that the mask can take some time to get used to and comfortable wearing.



image source

Canada’s largest reading program goes virtual | Instant News


image source

News Group The San Diego Community | Instant News

Published – 06/27/20 – 03:13 PM | 267 views | 0 | 5 5 recommendations | a letter to a friend | print

Dr. Alessandro Sette and Dr. Daniela Weiskopf, La JOLLA Institute of immunology.

Dr. Alessandro Sette and Dr. Daniela Weiskopf, La JOLLA Institute of immunology.


A new study by scientists from the Institute of La JOLLA immunology (LJI), and the medical center of Erasmus University (Erasmus) shows that even the most ill COVID-19 patients to produce T cells that help to fight the virus. The study offers new evidence that COVID-19 vaccine is necessary to cause T-cells to work together with the antibodies.

A study published June 26 in science Immunology, also shows that both Dutch and American patients have the same reaction to the virus. “This is the key to understanding how the immune system fights the virus,” says Professor LJI Alessandro Sette, Dr. Biol. Ekon. Sciences, who Co-led the study with Erasmus virologist Rory de Vries, Ph. D. “required vaccine approaches should be based on observations with different conditions, to ensure that the results are generally applicable.”

For the study, the researchers tracked ten COVID-19 patients with the most severe symptoms of the disease. All ten of them were hospitalized in the ICU of the Medical center of Erasmus University in the Netherlands, and put on the fans as part of their service. Two of the patients eventually died from the disease. An in-depth look at their immune system showed that all ten patients produced T-cells that target SARS-cov-2 virus. These T-cells work together with antibodies to try to clear the virus and stop the infection.

These findings are in line with the results of recent studies of cells from Sette, Professor LJI Shane crotty, Ph. D., LJI and colleagues, which showed a robust T cell response in patients with moderate cases COVID-19. In both studies, T cells in these patients deliberate emphasis of the spike protein in SARS-cov-2. The virus uses the spike protein to enter host cells, many vaccine efforts in the world aimed at getting the immune system to recognize and attack the protein. A new study offers new evidence that the spike protein is a promising target and confirms that the immune system can also mount a strong response to more virus.

“This is good news for those who make vaccines, using spike and it also offers new opportunities for potential increase potency of the vaccine,” says Daniela Weiskopf, Ph. D., research associate Professor at LJI and the first author of the new study.

Cooperation between scientists in La JOLLA and the Netherlands are also part of the overall picture and highlights the close cooperation of the philosophy adopted by the group LJI. Sette is a world leader in understanding what specific pieces (or antigens), the immune system recognizes when he is facing new germs. Work in the laboratory of Sette in the definition of epitope sets that allow you to measure SARS-cov-2 T-cell responses is a key element of the study.

In fact, LJI has become the center COVID-19 T cell research, and Sette sent reagents for more than 60 laboratories around the world. “The study is also very important because it shows how the science has no borders,” says Sette. “To truly understand a global pandemic, our approach must be global, and we need to study immune responses in people with different genetic backgrounds, living in different environments.”

Despite the cell paper, followed residents of San Diego, the new document follows the Dutch patients And T-cell responses were consistent in both populations. “This study is important because it shows that the immune response in patients thousands of kilometers away from each other,” says Weiskopf. “The same observation was heavily played on different continents and different research.”

In a study titled “phenotype and Kinetics of SARS-cov-2-specific T-cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome” was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreements No. 874735) National institutes of health (contract # 75N9301900065.)

Additional studies include Katherine C. Schmitz, Mathis P. Raadsen, Alba Grifoni, Nisreen A. M. Okba, Henrik Endeman, P. S. Johannes van den Akker, Richard Molenkamp, Marion P. G. Koopmans, Eric C. M. van Gorp, Bart L. Haagmans and Rik L. de Swart.


image source

The study of death resulted by employees of BLC reveals the closely linked behavior | Instant News

A joint study conducted under the guidance of UBC identified the behavioral and social characteristics that are most closely associated with human death.

Researchers from five universities studied 57 factors for the article that was published June 22 in The proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The three elements of the nearly five dozen studied Smoking, divorce, and alcohol consumption. Data analyzed for the study came from information received during 16 years (1992 to 2008) from 13,611 adults who participated in the survey of the American health and retirement, from age 50 to 104.

Those participants who died within six years after the survey (2008 and 2014) have analyzed their data to determine which of the 57 factors apply.

Because life expectancy in the US has remained at the same level during the last three decades compared to other industrialized countries, the study attempts to find out what factors contributing to death (except medical and biological reasons, which are always such top leaves) were the most common. Behavioral, social, psychological and economic characteristics became the criteria of the study.

(Life expectancy in Canada is constantly increasing over the past three decades, according Statistics Canada.)

Top 10 factors closely associated with death in the study, are:

  1. Current smoker
  2. History of divorce
  3. History of alcohol abuse
  4. Recent financial difficulties
  5. History of unemployment
  6. Previous history of the smoker
  7. Lower life satisfaction
  8. Never married
  9. History of grocery coupons
  10. Negative affectivity

22 Jun The release of UVTS, Eli Puterman, a leading author of the study and associate Professor in the UBC school of kinesiology—said that some of the more obscure categories involved in the analysis can provide the research tools for the development of initiatives to solve the problems of life expectancy.

Eli Puterman

“Smoking is understood as one of the most important causes of mortality for 40 years, if not more,” Puterman said, “but by identifying the factor as negative affect is the idea that you tend to see and feel more of the negative things in his life, we see that we may need to begin in relation to this measure.

“We can change it and affect the mortality rate? Similarly, we can target interventions for the unemployed and those with financial difficulties, to reduce their risk?”

Puterman said: ““If we are going to invest money and efforts in interventions or policy changes in these areas would provide the greatest return on that investment.”

The researcher was directed by the staff of the UBC kinesiology masters student hives Benjamin.

Puterman said that the lifespan of the research methodology was clearly significant in comparison with the approach of “snapshot” that can offer insight only a brief period in a person’s life.

“This shows that the life expectancy approach is needed to really understand the health status and mortality. For example, instead of just asking whether people are unemployed, we looked at their history of unemployment for 16 years. If they were unemployed at any moment, was that a predictor of mortality?

“It’s more than just a single snapshot in the lives of people where something could be missed because it will not happen. Our approach provides a look in potential long-term consequences through the lifespan of the lens.”

The American researchers involved in the study came from the University of California San Francisco, University of Pennsylvania, Stanford University and Johns Hopkins University.



image source