Tag Archives: external_partner

Now Chrome Can Block Ads That Release Power From Your CPU | Instant News

Chrome browser user take heart: Google The developer launched a feature that eliminates abusive advertising that secretly releases your CPU resources, bandwidth, and electricity.


This story originally appeared on Ars Technica, a trusted source for technology news, technology policy analysis, reviews, and more. Ars is owned by WIRED’s parent company, Condé Nast.

This step is done in response to a swarm of sites and advertisements first considered in 2017 who secretly use a visitor’s computer to mine bitcoin and other cryptocurrency. When a site or ad displays content, the embedded code performs intensive resource calculations and deposits the mined currency in the developer-defined wallet. To hide fraud, this code is often very obscured. The only signs that something is wrong is a rotating fan, a drained battery, and for those who are watching, an increase in network resource consumption.

In a The post was published on Thursday, Chrome Project Manager Marshall Vale said that while the percentage of crude advertisements is very low – somewhere around 0.3 percent – they are responsible for 28 percent of CPU usage and 27 percent of network data.

“We recently discovered that a small percentage of advertisements use disproportionate device resources, such as batteries and network data, without the user knowing,” Vale wrote. “These advertisements (such as those that mine cryptocurrency, are poorly programmed, or not optimized for network use) can deplete battery life, saturate tense networks, and cost money.”

To limit practices, Chrome limits the resources that display ads can use before users interact with them. If the limit is reached, the ad frame will navigate to an error page telling the user that too much resources are being used.

To arrive at the ad deactivation threshold, Chrome developers measure a large sample of ads that Chrome users encounter. Ads that use more CPU resources or network data than 99.9 percent of all ads will be blocked. That means 4 megabytes of network data or 15 seconds of CPU usage in a period of 30 seconds or 60 seconds of total CPU usage.

Chrome developers plan to experiment with limits over the next few months and add them to a stable browser version at the end of August. The purpose of the delayed launch is to give ad makers and providers the time to put limits on their coding. Chrome users who want to activate the feature faster can activate the flag in chrome: // flags / # enable-heavy-ad-intervention.

Firefox last year added a mechanism to block cryptojacking. It works by blocking known cryptojacking domains. This protection is useful, but the whack-a-mole approach is problematic because the domain is trivial to change. Some antivirus providers have provided a means for users to get rid of advertisements involved in so-called cryptojacking or similar types of abuse. Now, Chrome users have the original way to do the same thing.

This story originally appeared on Ars Technica.

More CABLE Stories


image source

Fanless Games Can Help Increase Field Level | Instant News

Soccer fans have always convinced that the referees were biased towards their team, and for the time being, they were actually right. In the years after the Second World War, teams in England were significantly more likely to lose when playing away, because most – it was expected – was due to the influence of boisterous home support on officials’ decision making.

English cable

This story originally appeared on WIRED UK.

This home advantage still exists in various sports – around 60 percent in football and baseball, and around 70 percent in basketball. But according to Alan Nevill, a professor of sports at Wolverhampton University, the effect has diminished over the years. That was as high as the game’s added goal in the post-war years, but now stands at around half.

That is still enough to potentially play an important role in the remainder of the Premier League season, which can be continued behind closed doors under plans being discussed by division clubs. Playing games without a crowd seems almost certain to go ahead, and there are proposals to use neutral venues to minimize the risk of spread corona virus Furthermore. It is even said that the whole of next season can be played without supporters, with restrictions on mass gatherings not being lifted for some time.

Some clubs and fans argue that proposals to play without fans risk threatening the integrity of the competition, which is usually balanced by teams that play each other at home and go away during the season. But sports science research shows that playing behind closed doors can help to equalize, by reducing refereeing bias, and helping players perform their best.

“In my research, we found that home profits still exist, even if there are no crowds,” said Niels van de Ven, a professor at Tilburg University. In 2011, he was analyzed game between teams that share stadiums – like Inter and AC Milan – to control the impact of physical regulation. “In matches where both teams are equally familiar with the stadium (they share it) there is no home advantage,” he said. “Overall, this seems to indicate that familiarity with the stadium (field specific, but also the ease of your experienced routine) is more important for home advantage than the crowd.”

However, more recent research on a wider set of games has found the opposite effect. In 2014, researchers Michela Ponzo and Vincenza Scoppo was found that even when teams share the stadium, “home” teams score 0.45 more goals than visitors, and about 13 percent are more likely to win.

Harvard researchers look at Premier League matches have been found that the home team scored 0.1 extra goals on average for every 10,000 extra fans present. This, according to them, is largely due to the influence of the audience on the referee, who is more likely to give a red card to the away team, and a penalty to the host. “It’s hard to say, and it’s almost impossible to prove, but based on my research, I would say that more than half of the home’s profits come from the crowd and the possibility of the crowd influencing the referees,” Nevill said.

His own research has shown the effect of crowd noise on officials. In 2002, he conducted a study in which 40 eligible referees were asked to rate records of various tackles, both with and without background noise. He found that background noise made the referee more uncertain, and was less likely to infringe on the home team. (He believes that VAR reviews should always be played back without sound to minimize the source of this interference.)

So, the lack of crowd can actually lead to a fairer outcome for the team that will play against the teams for a bigger reason – although obviously not all parties will get the same benefits, such as Brighton CEO and Hove Albion who are threatened with degradation, who played at the Amex Stadium, was quick to show recently. “Five of our nine remaining matches will be played at Amex – all five matches are very difficult but four against some of the biggest clubs in European football,” Paul Barber the word. “The disadvantages of those of us who don’t play the top league teams in our home stadiums and in a familiar environment, even with 27,000 Albion fans very unlikely to be present at Amex, are very clear.”


image source