Tag Archives: Gilgit-Baltistan

We need to save Gilgit-Baltistan from the destruction caused by PM Imran: Bilawal – Pakistan | Instant News

Published in 23 October, 2020 5:49

Bilawal said, the current government made the people unemployed

GILGIT (Dunya News) – Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Friday said that we need to save Gilgit-Baltistan from the devastation caused by Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Speaking to people in the Ganchhe district of Gilgit-Baltistan on Friday, he said that Imran Khan’s every promise turned out to be wrong, adding that we cannot give the PTI-led government a chance, adding that we must save Gilgit-Baltistan from the Prime Minister. .

The PPP chairman said that the prime minister promised to build 5 million houses and that no one was given a job.

He said, “Employees of every institution and people protested, adding that even Lady Health Workers, protested.

Bilawal said that the current government made people unemployed, while the PPP during his tenure raised the salaries of the armed forces. “PPP serves farmers, laborers, and the people of Gilgit-Baltistan,” he said, adding that his party always protects disadvantaged areas.

On Thursday, while addressing a labor convention in the Ghanche GB area, the head of the PPP claimed that his party would form a government in Gilgit-Baltistan.

He’s not a politician who won’t keep his promises. I am Bhutto’s grandson and do not take detours, he added.

“Look at what Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has done to Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. You and I will change the fate of Gilgit-Baltistan by working together. I’m not just here for the election, I still keep the promises I made in 2018.

“You will get freedom from the government in power like you get from the Dogra government. The PPP is the only party that can give you the rights given to the people and protect democracy.

“We are fighting against the elected government and the hybrid system through the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) platform. I encourage people living abroad to visit GB first and then Sindh. We will open universities and campuses across the province. “


image source

The truth and half truth of Moeed Yusuf who was not elected as the advisor to Imran Khan-ANI | Instant News

By Tilak Devasher
New Delhi [India] 19 October (ANI): An interview given by Moeed Yusuf, Prime Minister Imran Khan’s national security adviser and strategic policy planning, provided to an Indian media platform recently, made headlines in Pakistan. In some circles, it was even seen as a much-needed victory against the backdrop of the storm of protest by the Opposition.

What is the real role of Moeed Yusuf? A decision issued by the Chair of the Islamabad High Court in August 2020 stated that non-elected advisers and special assistants to the prime minister cannot exercise executive or administrative powers in carrying out government functions; any executive function performed will be deemed to have been taken illegally, and therefore no longer valid. Most importantly, according to court rulings, special advisers and assistants are not even authorized to speak on behalf of the government.

According to the same assessment, the PM’s advisor has no role in the policy affairs of a ministry. Pakistan has Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Ministers for Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan Affairs, so how do non-elected advisers make policy statements?
For example, Yusuf asserted that no decision had yet been made to make Gilgit Baltistan (GB) a province and GB would be included in the vote on the day the voting took place. Such policy statements are not only illegal and invalid but also raise the question of whether the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of Kashmiri Affairs have been dismissed or so incompetent that they are handing over responsibility in foreign policy and Kashmir affairs to unelected advisers?

Yusuf may have tried to avoid this breach by projecting himself the equivalent of India’s National Security Advisor (NSA). Unfortunately, he didn’t. Pakistan’s last NSA was Lt. Gen. Naseer Janjua (retired) who resigned in June 2018 after Imran Khan’s government came to power.

So, Yusuf doesn’t have the standi locus to make statements like he does to speak on behalf of the Pakistani government. On this basis alone, entire interviews can be discarded and are best viewed as individual views.

This article could end here but it is necessary to expose the untruth and half-truths that Yusuf made with the full knowledge and support of Imran Khan and through him in the army.

For starters, the interviews, which were conducted at the highest levels in Pakistan, pegged the lie that India was sending messages to Pakistan showing a desire to engage in dialogue. After painting India as the applicant, the interview allowed Yusuf to name the Kashmir-centered prerequisites Pakistan considered necessary for initiating dialogue.
It allows a cheap pulse for its domestic audience that Pakistan is not desperate for dialogue but is laying down difficult conditions before talks can take place. Yusuf must have recognized the absurdity of this condition and the logical conclusion is that if the offer of talks is not basically a bluff, then in a convoluted manner it is an indication that Pakistan is seeking talks.
In short, trying to convey the message that Pakistan was not too interested in dialogue with India, he was just the opposite. However, Yusuf’s efforts were in vain when a spokesman for the Indian MEA later denied claims that India was sending any messages for dialogue.

The more nasty board in the interview tries to force equality between Pakistan and India on the issue of terrorism. He tried to do this by linking to India, the individual who carried out specific attacks in Pakistan such as the Army Public Schools in 2014. Although Yusuf thought this would be sensational, it actually failed because it was not supported by any evidence nor was he convinced why the information was not was revealed before.

In Kashmir, Yusuf said that India has scored its own goals with the change of 05 August 2019, staring at the explosion, must save itself from embarrassment and reverse the course. This raises the question that if India is in a swamp, Pakistan should rejoice, then why should Yusuf be concerned?
Obviously, it is because India has handled the situation with maturity, belying Pakistan’s hopes and Yusuf articulates Pakistan’s frustration so that the situation doesn’t explode.

Yusuf’s underlying argument is that India has become a ‘rogue state’ because it never complied with the UN Charter and UN resolutions and now India has officially violated them. Yusuf clearly hasn’t read the UN resolutions and the step-by-step approach they have put in place for holding the vote. Perhaps it would be good for him to reread the resolution carefully and realize that it was Pakistan that did not follow the resolution and violated the UN resolution and not India.

The extraordinary assertion that Yusuf made was that Pakistan did not recognize the instrument of accession because it was signed under pressure. He, like others before him, had completely ruled out a Pak-sponsored invasion of the so-called muggers on 22 October 1947 which created the Kashmir problem in the first place.
Pakistan had directly planned and carried out the invasion despite having a Standing Agreement with the Maharaja. There is documentary evidence to suggest that Jinnah and Liaquat Ali were on board.
The options before the Maharaja were striking – accept the plunder and destruction of his kingdom or ask for help. He chose the last option but according to Yusuf, he made the suspect’s accession instrument !!! What Yusuf implied was that faced with an invasion, the Maharaja had to agree to Pakistan and then the instrument would become valid.

In Kulbhushan Yadav, Yusuf was also very weak. He claims that the two consular accesses granted are unhindered but they are just that. He insisted that India should choose Pakistani lawyers even after it was shown to him that as far back as April 2017, the Lahore High Court Bar Association had said that action would be taken against Pakistani lawyers defending Kulbhushan Jadhav.
Against such setbacks, how can India expect Pakistani lawyers to defend Jadhav? Joseph could not answer it well.

Regarding the Mumbai terror attacks, which realized Pakistan was buying time, Yusuf accused India of deliberately delaying sending witnesses and sharing evidence.
According to him, this was done to continue to accuse Pakistan of terrorism. This is indeed an absurd argument

The escape door that Yusuf uses is to claim a lofty moral ground, that at the instructions of his prime minister, he wants to talk about the future – ‘to talk to you how we can move forward, how can we solve our problems, not to bring up past matters . ‘
In other words, India should sweep Pakistani terrorist activity under the carpet and forget about it. Joseph had to realize that this was not going to happen. The precious lives of Indians have been lost that the country does not want to forget. Pakistan must accept that regardless of its terrorist activity in India there will be no movement forward and India will bring up its past with full satisfaction.

Where Yusuf is perhaps most self-destructive is his rejection of the Uighur genocide. He stated that the Uighurs were not a problem, ‘… I tell you as a responsible official, we know everything we need to know about the Uighurs and everything in China as they do about us. We have no worries, no worries at all. ‘This is not just an outright lie given the growing body of credible evidence, but it will haunt Joseph for a long time.

Defending the boss is admirable, but for Yusuf to claim that Imran Khan is a strategic thinker is ridiculous and humorous. Imran Khan’s track record is none other than being a strategic thinker while statements like that make Yusuf’s credibility too bad.

Overall, the most striking thing about the interview is the series of untruths and half-truths that Yusuf peddled. In the process, however, he uncovers Pakistan’s strategy to try to damage the Indian brand before India takes a seat on the UN Security Council.
(Disclaimer: The author of this opinion article is Tilak Devasher, who is the author of three well-known books on Pakistan and Member of the National Security Advisory Council) (ANI)

Rejection: The views expressed in the above articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of this publisher. Unless otherwise noted, the author writes in his personal capacity. They are not intended and should not be considered to represent the ideas, attitudes or official policies of any agency or agency.


image source

Protests erupted against Pak’s attempt to change the status of GB’s crackdown on -ANI activists | Instant News

Muzaffarabad (PoK) / Karachi (Pakistan) / Hunza (Gilgit Baltistan), 13 October (ANI): People from Gilgit Baltistan hold demonstrations across the region and in major Pakistani cities against Islamabad’s crackdown on civil rights and people’s politics.
Demanding the immediate release of rights activists who have been sentenced on false charges, the protesters have launched a massive resistance movement in the wake of Islamabad’s efforts to change the political status of occupied Gilgit Baltistan.
“We will not surrender until all the activists are released from prison. We are all ready to be arrested. We are waiting for the next steps of the Aseeran-i-Hunza Rihaee Committee. Whenever they call, we will hold back widespread protests across Diamer, Darel to the Khunjerab border. We will hold demonstrations in Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad. If necessary, we will go on strike, “said a leader of the Gilgit Baltistan Youth Alliance, Karachi.
In the city of Muzaffarabad in Pakistani-occupied Kashmir (PoK), a massive protest was organized on Sunday by the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front and the Student Liberation Front against the government’s decision to make Gilgit Baltistan a province.
Political activists say they will sacrifice themselves but will not allow Pakistan to change the status of the region. People from Gilgit Baltistan, who have lived in other Pakistani cities, have also taken to the streets against Islamabad’s arbitrary ruling.
Recently, the Minister for Kashmir Affairs of Pakistan and Gilgit Baltistan, Ali Amin Gandapur, revived the controversial issue of granting provincial status to Gilgit Baltistan.
The sudden announcement of the inclusion of Gilgit-Baltistan as Pakistan’s fifth province and the underlying reasons for the same is much broader and its implications are sure to set the tone for exacerbating tensions, which are already playing out in the east along the Line. Actual Control (LAC) at the India-China border.
Communities in the region have also protested against denial of fundamental rights and policies. They accuse the government of taking arbitrary actions in dealing with people who claim their rights.
They threatened to escalate their protests if Baba Jan and other activists who had been in prison for years were not released immediately.
Gilgit Baltistan, formerly known as the Northern Territory has been governed by the “Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self-Governance 2009”, which forms the electoral framework. Elections have been held in areas under the Order which provide limited autonomy.
People accuse Pakistan of systematically exploiting its resource areas and not sharing profits with them.
Any resistance they say was met with brutal reprisals by the government with activists and leaders being hunted down, arrested and tortured. (ANI)

Rejection: The views expressed in the above articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of this publisher. Unless otherwise noted, the author writes in his personal capacity. They are not intended and should not be considered to represent the ideas, attitudes or official policies of any agency or agency.


image source

Dissidents blame military intervention in politics for various crises sir | Instant News

Entangles the Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan as a “military puppet”, Pakistani dissidents blame the military-dominated hybrid system for the country’s crises. “Pakistan is under martial law without notification,” the Pashtun leader and former Senator Afrasiab Khattak said at the fifth annual South Asia Conference Against Terrorism and Human Rights (SAATH).

SAATH is a pro-democracy group Pakistani was co-founded by former Pakistan’s ambassador to the US, Husain Haqqani, and US-based columnist Mohammad Taqi. SAATH’s annual conferences were previously held in London and Washington but this year attendees met virtually. Khattak said martial law in Pakistan was “most dangerous” because it vulgarized and distorted constitutional institutions. “The current military regime delegitimizes political institutions, to the extent that intelligence services direct members of parliament when to attend sessions and when not to appear to vote.”

Pressuring the Prime Minister of Pakistan for blaming SAATH for weakening the country’s international standing, Haqqani noted, “Pakistan’s international standing is being lost because of its policies that promote extremism and suppress freedom, not because of their activism for human rights.” Several speakers, including Rubina Greenwood of the World Sindhi Congress, Owner of Tahira from Gilgit-Baltistan, Shahzad Irfan of the Seraiki Movement, and Rasool Mohammed The American Pashtun Council stressed that various nations in Pakistan were oppressed and denied their rights.

Irfan highlighted that military intervention in politics strengthened Punjab’s dominance and was a key factor in the oppression of national and religious minorities. Greenwood said that the only way for Pakistan to win the hearts of the Sindhi and Baloch people is to recognize that Pakistan is a multi-national country. He said that “Sindh is a historical entity that cannot be separated, or its identity denied.”

Jabeen called for an end to “73 years of political, constitutional, social, economic, geographic and cultural isolation of Gilgit Baltistan” and “autonomous arrangements.” Meanwhile, Shia rights activist Jaffer Mirza lamented anti-shia violence and blaming the authorities for legitimizing anti-shia politics through legislation, particularly the Tahaffuz-e-Islam (Protection of Islam) Bill.

Former ambassador, Kamran Shafi, also a retired military officer, said, “The higher ranks of the Pakistani Army must realize that a truly elected government must exist to take Pakistan from the threshold where the current regime has taken it.” “All of that COAS, General Bajwa, and what the ISI has to do is step back from politics, and let politics be, ” Shafi said, adding that it was “the only way out of the chaos facing our poor country.”

Based on Taqi, military rule has taken Pakistan from one disaster to another. “The narrative of patriotism has been framed around the army and competing world views of Pakistan and those who do not fit into military parameters ostracized as rebellion, treason and even blasphemy.” Prominent speakers and participants at the conference included female Pashtun activists Gulalai Ismail, an exiled journalist Taha Siddiqi and Tahir Gora |, and human rights defending Marvi Sirmed.

In its 73 year history of independence, Pakistan has been largely ruled by its military rulers such as Iskander Mirza, Ayub Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, and Pervez Musharraf. (ANI)


image source

Pakistan’s opposition party is openly opposed to a strong military | Instant News

Karachi: For the first time, Pakistan’s two main Opposition parties have publicly opposed the country’s powerful military, accusing it of rigging the 2018 elections that brought Imran KhanThe Pakistani Tehreek-e-Insaaf party comes to power.

In the past, political leaders have only indirectly pointed to the involvement of the military in the country’s political affairs but this is the first time the leaders of the two main Opposition parties – the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) openly criticized the military.

Former prime minister and supremo PML-N Sharif, who has been in London since November last year and is facing multiple corruption cases, opened fire first at the prime meeting of the Pakistan Democratic Movement, an alliance formed by Opposition parties last month to overthrow. Prime Minister Khan.

Sharif has accused the military of rigging the 2018 elections to bring Prime Minister Khan to power.

He said meddling in politics in equal measure was treason under the country’s Constitution.

His allegations sparked outrage from Khan, who said Sharif was “playing a very dangerous game” by humiliating the military and intelligence services. He dismissed the allegations of fraudulent elections as baseless.

Sharif served as prime minister of Pakistan three times, first being removed by a president in 1993, then by the military ruler Pervez Musharraf in 1999. A court in 2017 removed him from power over allegations of corruption. Khan, a former cricketer, came to power in 2018.

After Sharif, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Friday accused the military of rigging the 2018 elections.

Bilawal warned of interference in the upcoming legislative assembly elections in Gilgit-Baltistan will elicit a strong backlash from his party, including the Islamabad siege and sit-ins on the city.

“Such things were never witnessed even in the dictatorships of General Zia and General Musharraf,” Bilawal was quoted as saying by the Dawn newspaper.

“I was wondering how you deployed one soldier inside and another outside the polling station. It was very strange. Even if you (the military) did something wrong or not, you will be blamed. This cannot happen,” he said.

He said, “PPP will not allow anyone to steal the mandate of the people in the upcoming elections in Gilgit-Baltistan.”

Pakistan has announced that elections for the once postponed Gilgit-Baltistan legislative assembly will be held on November 15, amid strong objections by India to Islamabad’s move to change the status of the military-held territory.

India also clearly conveyed to Pakistan that the entire Union of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, including the Gilgit and Baltistan regions, is an integral part of the country. Pakistan’s top military officials have recently advised political parties to stop dragging them into politics and making baseless accusations against them.

Prime Minister Khan on Friday said the real problem of the Opposition with the military is that they remain out of control Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) is unlike other institutions once the agency finds out about their corruption.

On September 20, leaders of the 11 major Opposition parties formed the Democratic Movement of Pakistan (PDM) to launch a three-phase anti-government movement under an “action plan” starting with public gatherings across the country, protest demonstrations, and demonstrations before the “run.” long fateful marching “towards Islamabad in January 2021.

Opposition parties will hold their first joint rally against the government led by Imran Khan on October 16 in the city of Gujranwala in Punjab province, demanding to topple the resignation of the “elected” prime minister and end the military’s strong role in the country’s politics. .

Opposition leaders have announced that they will use all political and democratic options, including a motion of no confidence and a mass resignation of Parliament to seek “the resignation of the elected prime minister and end the established role in politics.


image source