Tag Archives: Military and Defense Issues

Nuclear Free and Free Pacific Day 2021 | Instant News


Today, March 1, is Nuclear Free and Free Pacific Day – the 67th anniversary of the ‘Bravo’ nuclear bomb blast by the United States near the surface of Bikini Atoll, in the Marshall Islands, which blew up a crater more than 200 feet deep and one mile.

The radioactive fallout particles from the explosion landed on Rongelap Island (100 miles away) to a depth of one and a half inches in some places, and radioactive fog appeared on Utirik (300 miles away). The US Navy did not dispatch ships to evacuate the residents of Rongelap and Utirik until three days after the explosion. The fallout from this one nuclear weapon explosion was spread over more than 7,000 square miles, and its tracks were detected across the Pacific, in India, Japan, the United States, and Europe. Marshallese, and other Pacific people were the targets of more than 300 full-scale nuclear bomb blasts in the Pacific – carried out by Britain, France and the US – were used as guinea pigs in lewd experiments to ‘advance’ the frenetic pursuit of nuclear weapons supremacy.

Nuclear Free and Free Pacific Day is a day to remember that the arrogant colonial mindset that allows, indeed encourages, this horror continues to this day – the Pacific is not nuclear free or independent yet.

Much of the Pacific remains under foreign control, from military or illegal occupation to reliance on colonizing states for international representation, including ‘American’ Samoa, Cook Islands, French-Occupied Polynesia, Guam, Hawai’i, Kanaky, Niue, Norfolk Island , Maria Utara, Pitcairn Island, Rapa Nui, Tokelau, Uvea mo Futuna, and West Papua. These voices of Pacific peoples, along with voices of ngā hapū o Aotearoa and indigenous Australians, are not heard live at the UN General Assembly and other international forums where so many decisions on crucial issues affecting our region are made – not just nuclear ones. weapons and other disarmament priorities, but also on social and economic justice, human rights, protection of natural resources and the environment, the COVID-19 pandemic, climate justice and demilitarization.

The Pacific is one of the regions that is, and will continue to be, the most impacted by climate change and extreme weather events affecting lowland islands and Pacific peoples who depend on natural resources for food, clothing and shelter, and on adequate water resources. vulnerable to salinization due to rising sea levels and high seas. However, most fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions do not come from Pacific island countries.

The Pacific is also one of the most militarized regions in the world – but only four Pacific island nations have armed forces. The majority of militarization in the Pacific comes from outside the region – military bases, military training and military occupation by the armed forces of Indonesia, France and the United States, in particular, along with Australia, Britain, China, New Zealand, Russia and others.

Nuclear Free and Free Pacific Day is a day to think about the many faces of colonialism – physical, cultural, spiritual, economic, nuclear, military – past and present; ongoing issues of independence, self-determination and sovereignty here in Aotearoa New Zealand and other colonized and occupied countries in the Pacific; and the ability of Pacific peoples to stop further nuclearization, militarization and economic exploitation of our region.

It is a day to recognize and remember those who have suffered and died in the struggle for freedom around the Pacific; those who opposed colonialism in its various forms and paid for their opposition with their health and life; and those who have suffered and died as a result of nations’ use of the Pacific by nuclear weapons for nuclear experiments, uranium mining, nuclear bomb explosions, and nuclear waste disposal.

It is a day to celebrate the courage, strength and resilience of Pacific indigenous peoples who have maintained and reclaimed control over their lives, languages ​​and lands to ensure that the ways of life and existence passed down from their ancestors are passed on to the future. generation.

This is a day to pledge your support to continue the struggle for a nuclear free and independent Pacific, as the theme of the 8th Conference on the Free and Free Nuclear Pacific says: “No te parau tia, no te parau mau, no te tiamaraa, e tu, e tu – For justice, for righteousness and for freedom, get up, stand up! “

© Scoop Media

.



image source

Another New Zealand Middle East Military Deal Fails in Prime Minister’s ‘Sniffing Test’ | Instant News


The Palestinian Solidarity Network Aotearoa said the Prime Minister should implement the ‘Middle East sniff test’ again. This time for the New Zealand government’s military dealings with Israel.

It follows that Air New Zealand is repairing equipment for the Saudi Arabian navy, while Saudi Arabia attacks civilians in Yemen, triggering a severe humanitarian crisis.

PSNA chairman John Minto said the Prime Minister should sniff out the purchase of New Zealand Defense Force military equipment from Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems Limited.

“The Elbit system acts illegally under international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. ‘

“This is too much for the New Zealand Superfund, which withdrew investment from Elbit Systems in 2012.”

The Superfund found Elbit was helping build Israel’s so-called “security wall” inside the Israeli-occupied West Bank. In 2003, the International Court of Justice declared the wall illegal under international law.

John Minto said the Elbit System offers its weapons “battle tested” in Palestine.

“However, despite the stance taken by Superfund, and the ACC as well, the Ministry of Defense ignored the requirements of New Zealand and international law, not to say basic morality, and continued to purchase military equipment from the Elbit System.”

“Previous Defense Minister Ron Mark ignored international law and the brutal persecution of the Palestinian people.”

“The purchase continues,” said John Minto. There is blood on this apparatus.

“The PM must follow his nose and resolve this issue quickly – the office of the new Minister of Defense has not responded to four PSNA communications on the matter since last year’s election.”

“New Zealand’s defense and foreign policy must have an ethical and moral basis in line with international law, United Nations resolutions, and in particular New Zealand’s obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention.”

© Scoop Media

.



image source

The Best Way to Defend New Zealand From Nuclear War and Climate Change | Instant News


We often hear from Government and Media spokespersons about the need to support an “international rules-based order” (IRBO). The question that needs to be asked, however, is what are the ‘rules’ that underlie this order – which the US, UK, Australia, New Zealand and other nations in Washington’s orbit are so incessantly promoting? New Zealand’s sustainability may depend on the successful rearrangement of the rules governing Global Politics, so such an objective should be a priority on our Government’s foreign affairs agenda in these terms.

The Dig recently featured a most timely article by Robert Patman on the foreign policy challenges facing the New Zealand Government. Patman recommends that New Zealand add its diplomatic voice to countries wishing to revise the status quo as exemplified by
international rule-based rules (IRBO) where the spokesperson who governs the West, including New Zealand is very fond of claiming their allegiance.

The fairness of the ‘rules’ on which IRBO is based, and for that matter, how ‘orderly’ it is, is the subject of intense debate for many, especially those in the Global South and countries that are not on the side of the US. . The frank debate about – who writes, who benefits, and who prevents changes – these rules are long overdue.

Such dialogue can benefit our entire Civilization, and indeed our global biodiversity system. This could lead to greater peace-building, less inequality, and more collaboration to solve the biggest problems we face – Climate Change and Global War. Reorganizing this system may seek to build a more multilateral, undamaged, global system of government based on the free consent of all countries. This will likely be characterized by a more proportionate share of power and wealth, and a more equitable law enforcement agency. This will enable the exploitation of a large amount of potential and ingenuity in the underdeveloped world, and actually create for the first time, an International Community of nations founded on respect and equality.

International Rules-Based Orders

Rocket Lab’s personal launch site: Launch Complex 1 in Māhia, New Zealand. Source Rocket Lab.

“Our defense engagement with the United States strengthens NZ’s ability to contribute to an international rules-based order and international security and to protect and promote New Zealand’s interests.”

Ron Mark, then Minister of Defense of New Zealand,

The quote above is taken from a recent email from Ron Mark, NZ Defense Minister, in response to an NZ peace activist’s question about a military satellite launched from NZ territory by US-owned company Rocket Lab Ltd. His reasons for supporting ‘rules-based-international-order’ are regularly featured in the New Zealand Defense White Paper. In this September issue NZ International Reviews, The Secretary of Defense, Ron Mark, in an article looking back at his achievements in office, mentioned New Zealand’s support for this ‘rule-based-international-order’ no less than six times.

Hon. Ron Mark (Left) with Former Deputy PM, Hon. Winston Peters.

Perhaps the question that needs to be asked is what ‘rules’ are the basis of New Zealand’s defense policy and which the US, UK, Australia and other countries in Washington’s orbit are so aggressively promoting? As every follower of international relations since WWII will see, these rules suit states that have more power to regulate them than they do not. “Britain rules the waves and England rules the rules!”

To the detriment of all humanity, they have allowed the worst offenders to steal imagined short-term economic gains by unilaterally tearing up the Paris agreement on climate change. Likewise, the JCPOA, which was designed to ensure that Iran would not develop nuclear weapons and instead, that its population would avoid crippling economic sanctions, was unilaterally dumped by the ‘leaders’ of our rules-based order. Under the current set of rules, torture, murder, subversion of governments of other countries, incitement of enmity and reckless rebellion through deliberate false flags and misleading public opinion can, and have all been carried out with impunity.

These rules have allowed for the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Serbia, Libya, Israeli snipers covering the knees of hundreds of Palestinian protesters and the displacement of millions of refugees. This system allowed 7.5 million tonnes of bombs to be dropped on Laotian Vietnamese and Cambodians, and continued to allow the terrorization of countless long-range populations and the sudden death of unseen drones. They allow the manipulation of the global monetary system to impose economic sanctions that effectively damage the livelihoods, health and happiness of a large part of the global population.

Global disruption collapsed online by Ingram Pinn

This October, the US imposed new banking sanctions on Covid-19-hit Iran that would severely limit its ability to provide medical assistance to its population. Among many other things, rules-based systems accept the deliberate subversion and sabotage of human efforts to build effective multinational institutions such as the WHO, OPCW, and ICC.

Web search for ‘treaties not signed or not ratified by the United States’ provides a list of international treaties the leaders of our ‘natural allies’, have withdrawn from, refused to ratify, or have ratified and then withdrew unilaterally.

This agreement represents the ‘rules’ on which the global system is based and which NZ claims to maintain.

How can New Zealand keep a flat face? In order to preserve the ‘international rules-based order,’ which he claims to be his national security, at the same time, he trains, cooperates with, and provides comfort to publicly displayed consent to his agitators. numerous, repugnant (and by what means, is there a universal and enforceable criminal act of the rule of law)?

If New Zealand’s national security is truly reliant on participating in this appalling misbehavior, at least New Zealanders should avoid the hypocrisy of our government by calling it ‘rules by the rules.’ The shovel should be called a shovel. Let us admit the present, so-called ‘order based on the rules,’ for what it is: anarchist playground where the strongest and least afraid of using force, decide the rules that the less powerful nations must obey. Such a system bears a closer resemblance to rule in forests than to rule of international law.

The New Zealand government must stop pretending. They need to publicly acknowledge that New Zealand prefers to accept what may be true, or to take effective action to support the rule of international law. To do so would require refusing to participate in the current ‘rules by the rules’ with inherent aggressiveness, which is well exemplified by the obscene tonnage of bombs dropped on defenseless countries and the thousands of children who have experienced drone trauma in developing countries. .

Now, New Zealand is lining up to support this aggressive alliance in its conflict with China, one of NZ’s two main trading partners. Despite the deliberate distortion in mainstream Western (or more accurately ‘corporate’) media, China remains a staunch supporter of international law and institutions, and has not dropped bombs on anyone.

Robert Patman is fully justified in advocating for New Zealand to seriously consider joining the Non-Aligned Nation Movement, or such a solution. The NAM was no longer a force in its heyday, and doing so would involve leadership to make it a significant force in global politics that the world craved. There are other organizations, such as the G77, which can also be considered as possible vehicles for New Zealand diplomatic initiatives. In this new era of connectedness that Patman describes so well, such a move can only be in New Zealand’s best national interest.

NZ adopting such an autonomous neutrality or non-alignment policy would involve removing public engagement from much of Washington’s rule-based order. From such a position, rather than comforting Washington and its satellites by offering at least tacit approval of their hostility, New Zealand can then conclusively support two of the world’s greatest and most pressing ‘needs’. This is the first, peaceful reconciliation and coexistence between the ‘eastern’ and ‘western’ blocs and second, the empowerment of the United Nations to enable it to ensure that the international community functions under a fair and effective rules-based international order.

No convincing argument can be made that the US and its allies are not an aggressive force that can harm those who refuse to submit to selfish ‘rules’. It is much easier to find evidence that among those who accept Western aggression, China and Russia, despite claims of the Western media’s highly effective PR machines, will be willing to conform to an international rules-based system. Such a system must be governed through an undamaged multilateral institution where the rules are drawn up multilaterally and with a much greater degree of consensus than seems achievable under the current UN constitution where the winners of World War II are still unjustifiable. holds such disproportionate power.

Given that New Zealand’s survival may depend on the successful outcome of such an endeavor, such a goal would be commensurate with New Zealand’s full and enthusiastic support. The most recent issue of The New Zealand International Review contains an article on how Lichtenstein (population 38,000) was instrumental in ensuring that waging aggressive warfare is universally viewed as a crime against humanity.

With a will, even the smallest country can achieve great victories for mankind.

Read More or Comment on The Dig

All Content on The Dig is published under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

See the License Deed | See Code of Law

Images on The Dig may be subject to Copyright requirements and must be cleaned for commercial use.

© Scoop Media

.



image source

Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty: Pacific Island States Play Important Role | Instant News


Last Friday, October 23, the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons reached its 50th ratification at the United Nations. The treaty will enter into force 90 days later, on January 22, 2021. For the first time, it will create a global norm that explicitly prohibits nuclear weapons under international law.

Pacific Island nations have played a vital role in achieving this historic moment. Pacific nations make up ten of the fifty total ratifications. Fiji, Kiribati, New Zealand, Palau, Samoa, Tuvalu and Vanuatu were among the first countries to sign the Treaty when it first opened for signature in September 2017. The Cook Islands and Niue also later merged. And Nauru is one of three countries that deposited their instruments of ratification at a signing ceremony in New York last Friday to push the Treaty over the edge.

This fits with the Pacific’s strong history of opposing nuclear weapons. The region has experienced a devastating impact: more than 315 nuclear tests have been carried out in the Pacific, including in Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Australia and French Polynesia, leaving a legacy of widespread environmental damage and health complications.

On August 29 this year, on the International Day Against Nuclear Test, Tuvalu delivered a statement to the United Nations on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum, identifying the use and testing of nuclear weapons as one of the most serious threats to the nation’s community. and future generations: “Therefore, our collective global goal must be to strive for a world free from nuclear weapons, and other weapons of mass destruction.”

The International Committee of the Red Cross, along with other components of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, have long advocated the elimination of nuclear weapons. We are proud to have contributed to this important step forward, and sincerely commend all governments that have joined the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty. “While this is a victory for the Pacific region and humanity, the ban on nuclear weapons is not an end in itself. We must continue our efforts and make a world without nuclear weapons, ”said Vincent Ochilet, Head of the ICRC Regional Delegation in the Pacific.

© Scoop Media

.



image source

New Zealand Increases Preparations to Join US War Against China | Instant News


By Tom Peters, Socialist Equality Group
July 11, 2020, original url: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/07/11/nzml-j11.html

The New Zealand Labor Party leadership, like its neighbor in Australia, increased military spending and recruitment as part of US-led preparations for the war against China, which has accelerated in response to the global economic crisis triggered by COVID-19. pandemic.

The US ruling class is determined that the impetus of war will be a means to reverse its economic decline and divert working class opposition to an unprecedented level of social inequality. The Trump administration, which is supported by Democrats, sees China as a major obstacle to US hegemony, and has asked its allies for support in increasing military power.

Ministers from Five Eyes countries – top-level intelligence sharing network that includes New Zealand, Australia, the US, Britain and Canada – issued a joint statement on June 24 pledging to “advance defense and security cooperation” to maintain “global orders the more challenged. “

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s government, a coalition between the Labor Party, the Green Party and the right-wing New Zealand National Party, is committed to spending $ 20 billion on military upgrades.

This money was transferred to the military during the worst economic and social crisis since the Great Depression and at the expense of the working class. Unemployment is expected to exceed 10 percent and nothing is done to stop hundreds of thousands of people from falling into poverty. The health care system lacks resources, making this country very vulnerable in the event of an outbreak of COVID-19.

On June 26, the New Zealand Navy received a new fleet tanker, Aotearoa, which was built with a $ 500 million goal by South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries. Aotearoa is the largest ship that has served in the Navy and can operate in the Pacific and Antarctica.

On July 8, Defense Minister Ron Mark, a member of NZ First, announced the purchase of 43 armored vehicles specifically designed for the army. Stuff noted that the Bushmaster vehicle was already being used by the elite Special Air Service (SAS) and other Five Eyes members.

The number of regular troops in the New Zealand army will increase from 4,500 to 6,000 by 2030. The Defense Force has reported a 21 percent increase in applications to register between March and May, compared to the same period last year, driven by heavy work. disadvantage among young people.

Significantly, Mark praised the $ 270 billion military expenditure program announced by the Australian government this month that included new long-range missiles. Prime Minister Scott Morrison has explained that this aims to prepare for war against China.

Morrison told the media that tensions between the US and China meant the world was in a dangerous period comparable to the 1930s and 1940s, namely the Second World War. He stressed that “all our defense forces and defense strategies are built on an alliance … with the United States.”

Defense Minister Mark New Zealand’s solidarity with this strategy, said Stuff: “What is good for Australia and Australia’s defense is ultimately good for New Zealand.” Canberra, he said, had shown “a clear commitment … to defend not only his own interests, but also for our Pacific partners, and the full realization of the challenges we all face.”

Mark added that he was “very pleased that the door was wide open for New Zealand’s defense industry players to tender” for an Australian military contract.

Mark and Morrison’s statement reveals the New Zealand government’s fake “humanitarian” fraud for military spending, including claims by the Green Party that new warships, aircraft and other military hardware are needed to provide assistance in disasters related to climate change.

In reality, the ruling elite of New Zealand is preparing to join what will become a catastrophic war involving nuclear armed forces. This has strengthened alliances with US imperialism, including by joining wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, in return for Washington supporting New Zealand’s neo-colonial activities in the South Pacific.

In 2018, the Ardern government supported the US in labeling China and Russia the biggest “threat” to global stability. It also calls on Washington to send more military troops to the Pacific, to push back against China’s economic and diplomatic presence.

Parts of the media and academics, including supporters of the Labor Party and NZ First, have spent years trying to create a climate of war by igniting anti-Chinese sentiment.

These efforts have been intensified in recent weeks, with new attacks on opposition born in China, Member of the National Party Jian Jian. Under intense pressure, Yang announced on Friday that he would retire from politics after the September election, having previously said he would stand up.

Jamil Anderlini, editor of the Financial Times Asia, confirmed to TVNZ on June 28 that Yang was part of “the expansion of Chinese power into New Zealand.” This claim echoes the claims made by pro-US academics Anne-Marie Brady, without proof, that Yang is an agent of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The fascist group, Action Zealandia, also attacked Yang and accused the National Party of treason.

The key role in this campaign is played by the Daily Blog, which is supported by Unite and other unions. The blog organized a petition calling for Yang to be removed from parliament because, decades ago, he taught English at the Chinese military intelligence training academy.

Editor Martyn Bradbury wrote on July 7 that the National Party was “a front for Chinese business interests” and dangerous for “national security.” Referring to party leader Todd Muller as “Beijing Muller,” Bradbury rejected his statement that Yang left the CCP 26 years ago and was a loyal New Zealand citizen.

The Daily Blog, which reflects the bureaucratic unions of trade unionism, advocated New Zealand to become a “bulwark” with a large military and immigration ban.

The National Party represented parts of the bourgeoisie that supported the alliance with Washington but remained uneasy about the economic impact of alienating China, New Zealand’s largest trading partner. On the other hand, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters, leader of NZ First and also foreign minister, called on New Zealand to reduce “dependence” on trade with China.

Peters announced on July 9 that New Zealand would join other Five Eyes countries in “reviewing” its involvement with Hong Kong after Beijing implemented a repressive “national security” law.

The NZ First Bloc, which has a long history of promoting anti-Asian xenophobia, with the Labor Party, the Green Party and trade unions, is based on the support of all these organizations for New Zealand imperialism. The wealth of the bourgeois layers and the upper middle class they represent depends, on the final analysis, on military alliances and financial ties with the US and Australia.

© Scoop Media

.



image source