Tag Archives: NZ

Above trio: Utes a ton of New Zealand for 2020 – News | Instant News


That tends to party or starve in the utes – they are mostly models with a long life cycle, but their popularity and intense competition also means we sometimes see angry new-model activities. There are three important trios of a new ton launched in New Zealand for 2020: an entirely new incarnation of one of the most controversial utes on the market, a closely related reboot for grassroots favorites and a greatly enhanced version of the icon.

Mazda BT-50

With the previous BT-50, Mazda made the most of the fact that it uses passenger car styling cues.

That is a controversial view to say the least, with a very smiling grille and horizontal tail lights that cross into the tailgate – unique in the ute segment.

Mazda has done the same thing again with the BT-50 which is all new, but this time around the cue the passenger car seems to sit rather gracefully on the double cabin platform (and more traditional tail lights). This is clearly part of the same family as the CX-8 and CX-9 SUVs, but it also looks classy in its own way.

The interior is definitely one of the most luxurious in the ute segment, with a nine-inch touch screen and glossy trim inserts.

Power will come from 3.0-liter turbo-diesel which produces 140kW / 450Nm. It’s up to the best segment for towing (3.5 tons) and one ton load.

Sophisticated driver assistance features quickly reach a ton of roads. Like Hilux, the BT-50 will have features such as adaptive cruise control, autonomous braking, and lane-keep assistance.

BT-50 is scheduled to launch later this year.

To see all Mazda BT-50 models currently listed on DRIVEN, click here

Isuzu D-Max

The biggest change for the BT-50 is that it is no longer built on the Ford Ranger platform – now “supplied by Isuzu Motor Limited on an OEM basis”, in Mazda’s own words.

That means there is also The all-new Isuzu D-Max is on its way. This is the model we know the least today; but the formidable new look of the model was revealed late last year, with top models looking ready to wear stylish bash plates and large wheel arch extensions.

The interior is different from the BT-50 – but has taken similar steps in quality and technology, also with a nine-inch infotainment screen. While D-Max will be looking to maintain its status as a workhorse, there are a number of trim and car-like interior proof colors.

To see all the Isuzu D-Max models currently listed on DRIVEN, click here

Toyota Hilux

Ford Ranger has been NZ’s number one ute for six years now. But does the Blue Oval truck achieve the same status icons as the green Toyota Hilux? Don’t hesitate to argue among yourself.

That big news for Hilux at the end of the year will be a power bump to 150kW / 500Nm for the 2.8 liter turbo-diesel engine, up 15 and 11 percent respectively. There are more interesting capabilities as well: the 4WD automatic transmission model can now match the 3.5 tons rating of the manual gearbox version.

There are styling changes inside and out. Toyota NZ is slowly launching mobile projections on the updated model, so Hilux will join the Corolla and C-HR (not to mention Lexus RX) in offering Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

On the exterior, Hilux moves a little closer to the RAV4 and Land Cruiser models that look new with a much larger grille and new design lights that increasingly emphasize the width of the vehicle.

We also know that there will be a launch edition developed in New Zealand with a number of enhancements, including an improved suspension. There are no exact details yet, but this will be the closest thing to Hilux’s rival Ranger Raptor.

Furthermore, it is likely that there will be a genuine Hilux GR – but that will be a different matter and certainly not this year.

To see all Toyota Hilux models currently listed on DRIVEN, click here

.



image source

The ins and outs of the New Zealand WoF process – Suggestions | Instant News


When it’s time to get your annual Fitness Order (WoF), it’s perfectly normal to feel a little hesitant or anxious and think “what did the vehicle inspector find?”

However, the problem is that WF inspections are designed to ensure vehicle safety, and all inspectors must follow a strict set of rules.

Around 40 percent of New Zealand cars failed WoF inspections in the first instance, with most of them being defective due to lights and wipers. Some of the problems you can fix yourself before the test, while others can often be handled at your scheduled vehicle service before your annual WoF inspection.

What does a Fitness Warrants inspection cover?

Inspection is a public safety check. The aspects examined are specified in the NZTA vehicle inspection requirements (VIRM) manual and include:

  • Tire condition (including tread depth)
  • Brake operation
  • Structural conditions (rust not allowed in certain areas)
  • Lamp
  • Glass (is your car’s windshield safe?)
  • Car windshield washer and wiper
  • Door (does the door open and close safely?)
  • Seat belts (must not be damaged or too faded; buckles must work properly)
  • Airbags (if installed)
  • Speedometer (must work)
  • Steering and suspension (must be safe and secure)
  • Muffler (no leakage and no exhaust fumes or harder than the original exhaust system)
  • Fuel system (no leakage)
  • If you have modified a car, motorcycle, van, or other light vehicle, you might need a low volume vehicle certificate (mod cert)

What a Warrant of Fitness does not cover

WoF doesn’t dig deep into vehicle conditions. For example, it does not check items such as engines, couplings, gearboxes and differential conditions, lubricant levels, thickness of brake pads or life expectancy (unless they are seen below safe limits), paint and rust conditions in non-structural areas.

Being prepared

AA Members are entitled to two AA 10-Point Inspections on their vehicles each year, which are the basic health checks carried out by automotive technicians. It is ideal to get a check in between or even before your next WoF to make sure your vehicle stays safe on the road.

WoF inspection during Covid-19 level 2 warning

During alert level 2, it is still a requirement that vehicles must be safe to operate on public roads. At the very least, vehicle owners need to inspect their vehicles themselves.

To help smooth the transition back to compliance, WoF that expires on or after January 1, 2020 are temporarily extended to October 2020. If your WoW has expired, we recommend updating it as soon as possible.

With AA, you can be sure of getting reliable WoF inspections from the experts. AA will provide an independent assessment of the safety of your car.

AA Auto Centers, AA Vehicle Testing Stations and AA Vehicle Inspection sites are all open for WoF inspection during warning level 2. Agreement is not required at drive-through Vehicle Testing Stations and at most AA Vehicle Inspection sites. You may need to pre-order on the AA Auto Center website.

To ensure a safe social distance, the Testing Station will have an SMS-based queuing system.

.



image source

Spark of New Zealand to manage part of the country’s 5G allocation | Instant News


FILE PHOTOS: Billboards showing the 5G logo at the International Airport in Zaventem, Belgium 4 May 2020. Photos taken 4 May 2020. REUTERS / Yves Herman

(Reuters) – Spark New Zealand Ltd said it will manage part of the 5G spectrum allocation in the country as he prepares to launch mobile technology over the next year.

Telecommunications and digital service providers Kiwi said management rights would be offered for 60 megahertz (MHz) of the 3.5 gigahertz (GHz) spectrum in 5G cellphone technology in a statement on the New Zealand Stock Exchange.

That happened when Spark last year canceled plans to exclusively rely on Huawei China [HWT.UL] for the launch of 5G services in New Zealand amid concerns over national security.

Chief Executive Jolie Hodson said government allocations allow significant investment in 5G over the coming year and touted the importance of New Zealand’s response to and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. 5G cellular technology promises faster and better connectivity.

“Our recovery from COVID-19 is a long game … and in a world where physical distance will remain critical for some time, technology that connects people actually has a fundamental role to play in our economic recovery,” he said.

Spark last year canceled plans to rely exclusively on Huawei to launch a 5G cellular service with Chinese companies under international supervision amid accusations that its equipment could be used for espionage. Huawei has repeatedly denied the allegations.

The Kiwi company is still making Huawei part of the list of equipment suppliers chosen by three companies that include Nokia and Samsung Electronics.

Spark plans to launch 5G services at a number of major centers over the next year and said they want to work with the government to speed up the timeline for the long-term spectrum auction currently scheduled for November 2022.

Reporting by Shashwat Awasthi in Bengaluru; Editing by Ana Nicolaci da Costa

.



image source

Some indicators increased when New Zealand came out of locking | Instant News


New Zealanders move more in major centers and use more fuel and electricity while weekly exports hold out as the country abandons level 4 COVID-19 locking, Stats NZ said today.

COVID-19 data portal, our new webpage, includes about 40 near-real-time economic indicators from various sources to show the impact of COVID-19.

Web pages are updated frequently and in some cases every day. This shows some indicators of how New Zealand fared a week after moving to level 3 at 11:59 pm on Monday 27 April. The country is in lockdown level 4 alert for almost five weeks, from Thursday March 26.

“In the first week returning to level 3, more businesses can be opened, such as takeaways, and construction work can start again,” Indicator Aotearoa, New Zealand’s senior manager Aaron Beck said.

“We are starting to see early signs of more activity in a number of indicators, but it will take time to see how the broader economy is changing because of COVID-19,” Beck said. “Data portals are a simple way to see various data in one practical place.”

Traffic moves from low gear

It is estimated that the amount of weekly traffic in the main centers drops sharply after level 4 begins, down about 75 percent for light vehicles and about the same for heavy vehicles. The traffic count is now partially recovering.

In the past week, Auckland’s heavy vehicle traffic has more than doubled the low levels experienced during level 4 lockdown but still remains around a quarter below the level seen before locking.

In the past week, Auckland’s light vehicle traffic was about twice the low level experienced during level 4 lockdown but remained around half the level seen before locking.

The pictures are similar in other major centers in Wellington, Christchurch, Hamilton and Dunedin.

Graph showing Auckland weekly traffic - sites selected 5 days on average (excluding weekends) light vehicles. Data is available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/covid-19-data-portal.

Excited

Retail fuel supply also fell by around 75 percent after New Zealand moved to locking level 4 (based on Z Energy data).

In the week to May 3, after moving to level 3, retail fuel supply increased by about half, compared to the week ending April 26. The volume of fuel supply remains down at the level seen before locking.

Graph showing Z Energy's weekly fuel supply volume - retail. Data is available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/covid-19-data-portal.

Power demand increases

Electricity demand rose more than 20 percent from around 90 gigawatts hours before moving to alert level 3 to more than 110 gigawatts hours on May 6, increasing for several days – even before the cold front hit New Zealand.

This is similar to about 110 gigawatts hours a day before moving to level 4 on March 26.

Grid demand is influenced by weather and economic activity, for example, there is usually more demand when the weather is cooler and less demand in mild winters.

Graph showing daily electricity demand. Data is available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/covid-19-data-portal.

Broadband demand is soaring in lockdown

Daily broadband usage increased rapidly after locking level 4 began at 11:59 pm on March 25, as many people started working from home and students increased their use of the internet for online learning and entertainment.

Broadband usage is around 18 million gigabytes a day a week before level 4 lockdown ends (based on Chorus data). It declined slightly on the day the country moved to level 3.

On May 6, it returned to nearly 17 gigabytes, still well above 13-15 million gigabytes before the lockout began.

Chart showing daily Chorus broadband usage. Data is available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/covid-19-data-portal.

Export trade survives

Compared to the same period in 2019, New Zealand’s total exports from 1 February to the end of April 2020 approached the level seen in the same period last year.

The total temporary value of exports to all countries from 1 February to 29 April 2020 is around $ 15 billion, about $ 787 million lower than for the same period in 2019.

Graph showing the value of goods exports (cumulative) - temporary. Data is available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/covid-19-data-portal.

These graphs have been prepared to help inform government agencies when the COVID-19 outbreak developed throughout the world. NZ Stats now makes this data publicly available.

“Web pages can be expanded in the future, with additional economic, social and health indicators,” Beck said.

/ NZ Stats Public Release. See fully here.

.



image source

Scott Morrison said Australia did better on COVID-19 than New Zealand even though the key was less extreme. Is he right | Instant News


Claim

Australia and New Zealand remain among a small group of countries that have so far managed to conquer the deadly coronavirus pandemic.

But Prime Minister Scott Morrison wants to emphasize that Australia is not fully locked in with its trans-Tasman neighbor.

In a April 16 media conference, he said New Zealand has imposed an “even more extreme locked state” than Australia, but was less successful at suppressing the virus after taking into account population size.

“New Zealand decided to go further, but I noticed that the results we obtained were actually based on per capita actually better than what happened in New Zealand,” Morrison said.

Is it true that Australia has achieved better per capita results, even though New Zealand “decided to go further” with its economic and social lockup? RMIT ABC Fact Check investigates.

Decision

Mr. Morrison’s claim is a fair call.

His suggestion that Australia achieves “better” results on a per capita basis than New Zealand can be approached from several angles, including the total confirmed cases per capita, new daily cases per capita, the total number of deaths per capita, or the number of daily deaths per capita.

Australia has not achieved better results than New Zealand in terms of total (cumulative) cases per capita.

Australia also has not achieved better results on the total number of confirmed deaths per capita.

However, after each country was locked, Australia recorded a lower number of new daily cases per capita, using a three-day rolling average to overcome volatility.

Australia also recorded fewer per capita daily deaths, again using a three-day rolling average.

These steps capture the picture after the lock is in place, and better reflect Mr. Morrison’s claim about “the results we have”.

However, the difference between the two countries is very small.

Is Australia handling the COVID-19 crisis better than New Zealand?(AAP: Bianca De Marchi)

In addition, the conditions faced by Australia and New Zealand are not identical.

During the week when the two countries increased their respective lockouts (March 23-March 29), New Zealand experienced a very rapid acceleration of the spread of the virus, with the number of cases per capita jumping 371 percent, compared with 122 per cent increase in Australia.

New Zealand is also testing at a higher level, increasing the likelihood that more cases will be identified, and potentially giving the wrong impression that eradication efforts are more successful in Australia.

As noted by experts, it is still too early to make definitive judgments.

Assess claims

In filing the April 16 claim, Morrison attributed the results to the locking measures implemented in both countries.

And he talks about “the results we get”, showing a focus on results just before he makes a claim.

To test Mr Morrison’s claims, Fact Check uses data from Monday, March 30, through and including April 15, as a basis for comparison.

This represents the period immediately following the lockout that took effect in both countries, until the full day of the latest data available at the time Mr Morrison made his claim.

As noted, there are a number of ways to assess whether Australia has achieved “better” results than New Zealand on a per capita basis, including total confirmed cases, total confirmed deaths, new daily cases and new daily deaths.

But using the total number of confirmed cases or deaths as a basis for comparison does not tell us much about a country’s performance after the locking steps have been introduced.

For example, a country may have experienced a large number of cases and deaths from an early age, inflating the total, but then have taken steps to successfully suppress the virus.

Therefore Fact Examination places greater numbers on the numbers that indicate new daily cases or new daily deaths, than cumulative figures.

Because per capita numbers tend to be small and difficult to interpret, Fact Check has stated numbers as numbers per million people, in line with common practice.

Fact Examination relies on statistics compiled by organizations based at Oxford University Our World in Data, which in turn depends on data from European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), an agency established by the European Union in 2004 to track and monitor infectious diseases.

As the Facts Check previously showed, comparing statistics on coronavirus can be a problem, especially because different countries use different methodologies to record and report.

Question about time

It is difficult to be precise about the respective locking times in Australia and New Zealand, when a phased approach is applied.

However, the week that starts on Monday, March 23 is very important. During this week, the two countries dramatically improved locking rules to control the virus.

At noon on Monday, restrictions announced by Mr. Morrison The previous day took effect affecting businesses such as hotels, clubs, restaurants, entertainment venues, cinemas and casinos.

On Tuesday, Mr. Morrison announced prohibit all Australians from traveling abroad and expand the list of places that are prohibited from entering nail salons, fitness centers, swimming pools, museums and places of worship, among others.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to search, up and down arrows for volume.

Scott Morrison announced new quarantine measures for international travelers

On Friday, he announced that travelers arriving in Australia will be required to conduct compulsory 14 days of isolation at designated facilities.

Meanwhile on March 23 The Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, announced a series of actions that will be introduced in two stages for a week.

The first stage, called Level 3 Alert, including non-essential business closures and total bans on events and meetings. More formidable Level 4 Alert involves the closure of all schools and public places.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to search, up and down arrows for volume.

Jacinda Ardern warned tens of thousands would die if they didn’t act

During that critical week, the number of confirmed cases per million was recorded in New Zealand increased from 21 on Monday, to 99 the following Sunday – a 371 percent increase.

In Australia the acceleration was not that dramatic, with the number of confirmed cases per million increasing from 67 to 149, an increase of 122 percent.

Brian Cox, an epidemiologist from the University of Otago, said it was difficult to compare the two countries because the conditions they faced were not identical.

Associate Professor Cox likened the situation facing New Zealand to Italy, appointing several clusters related to returning travelers, a conference in Queenstown, two marriages with foreign guests, and visiting cruise ships.

“This is similar to the cause of a rapid increase in infection rates in Italy,” Associate Professor Cox told Fact Check.

“The available facilities will not be able to handle it and this cluster-based epidemic control will be completely gone.”

Locked ‘more extreme’?

Morrison noted in his press conference that the actions taken by the two countries “largely reflect one another”.

However, he also said New Zealand “decided to go further” by forcing an “even more extreme lockdown” situation.

Since Mr. Morrison’s media conference, both Australia and New Zealand has begun to reduce some of the restrictions.

In Australia, locking rules and social distance are less prescriptive, with more room for interpretation. The rules also vary, sometimes greatly, between jurisdictions.

The following table summarizes the main steps that took effect in Australia and New Zealand when Morrison filed a claim on April 16.

National measures (at stage 4 restriction in NZ) Australia New Zealand
Travel

International arrivals are quarantined for 14 days in the city of arrival.

International travel is prohibited (exceptions are limited).

Only Australian citizens, residents and close family members can travel to Australia.

No foreigners can enter NZ.

Returning residents must be quarantined upon arrival.

Business

Most non-essential venues were closed, including pubs, fitness centers, cinemas, casinos, and places of worship.

Restaurants and cafes are permitted to offer takeaway / home delivery.

Hair stylists are permitted to operate on a limited basis.

Heavy restrictions on business that is not important.

Important businesses that are left open include hospitals, supermarkets, pharmacies, utilities.

There is no takeaway or coffee but some prepared foods such as meat pies are allowed at gas stations.

School / child care The federal government’s advice is that schools are safe, low-risk environments, but it is up to the state to decide whether to remain open and if so whether only for children of important workers. University closed. The government subsidizes child care. All schools, early childhood centers, universities are closed. Government funded child care workers provide some home care for children under 14 from important workers.
Work Work from home if possible. Working from home is mandatory, unless it’s impossible. Only important workers are allowed to leave their homes.
Sports

Varies from country to country. In general, you can exercise with a household member or one other household member.

Exercising in public spaces such as parks is permitted, at a distance of 1.5 meters from the others.

Not allowed to exercise with other household members.

Sports are permitted in outdoor places near the house; a distance of two physical meters must be maintained.

Leaving home

People should not leave their homes except for important reasons. Important reasons include shopping for food, exercising outdoors, going out for medical needs, providing care or support to someone else in a place other than your home, and going to work or studying if you can’t do it from home.

Stay at home aside from important personal movements.

Public transportation Operate with physical distance measures in place and increase cleaning. Can be used by people who work in important services or by people who get medical assistance or important supplies.
Social distance People must maintain a distance of 1.5 meters from each other if they are in contact with members outside their household. Keep a distance of 2 meters from people at all times except household members.
Wedding No more than five people attended, including the bride and groom. Not allowed.
Funeral Funerals are limited to 10 people. The 4 square meter rule and social distance must be observed.

Not allowed.

People from the same household isolation group as the deceased can go to a funeral home and grave with the deceased. Social distance must be considered.

Source: government document on April 16.

As the table shows, many of the actions taken by the two countries are similar, although New Zealand, as noted by Morrison, is tougher in its approach.

In New Zealand, for example, all but the most important retail businesses were forced to close, while in Australia many stores were allowed to remain open, albeit on a limited basis.

New Zealanders are also only allowed to live in their “local area” when leaving home – that is, they can only visit nearby places for important services or local training.

In Australia, domestic travel should be avoided but some states have exceptions to restrictions, such as visiting other properties you own or compassionate land.

In Australia, restaurants and cafes are allowed to take home, while in New Zealand they are forced to close.

Weddings and funerals are also completely prohibited in New Zealand (with some exceptions limited to close relatives), while in Australia they are allowed to take place with severe restrictions that limit the number of people present.

Although it is clear that New Zealand goes further than Australia by locking it up, it is less clear the question of whether Australia is more successful at suppressing the virus.

Total cases per capita

Total, cumulative cases detected were higher in terms of per capita in Australia than New Zealand.

On April 15, the day before Mr Morrison gave his press conference, Australia had recorded 252 cases per million people, compared to 224 in New Zealand.

Australia records an average of 37 more cases per million than New Zealand between March 30 and April 15.

Daily case per capita

The impact of oppression measures can also be assessed by examining the number of new cases recorded every day. This is more relevant to Mr. Morrison’s claim.

To overcome daily volatility, Fact Check smoothes numbers using a three-day rolling average.

Over the three days to April 15, Australia recorded a daily average of 1.7 confirmed cases per million, compared with 2.0 cases per million in New Zealand.

From 30 March to 15 April, Australia recorded an average of 6.0 new daily cases per million, compared to 7.3 new daily cases per million across Tasman.

Death per capita

Another way to assess the relative performance of Australia and New Zealand is to look at confirmed per capita deaths.

As the graph shows, Australia’s total per capita deaths have not achieved better results than New Zealand.

As of April 15, Australia had recorded 2.4 deaths per million, compared with 1.9 deaths per million in New Zealand.

What about the number of daily deaths?

As with the number of cases confirmed every day, this action provides a faster snapshot, and reflects the results since locking.

The following table shows the number of confirmed daily per capita deaths, again smoothed using a three-day rolling average.

As the graph shows, New Zealand’s average daily mortality rate surpasses Australia during the second week of April.

Over the three days to April 15, Australia recorded a daily average of 0.05 deaths per million people, compared with 0.35 in New Zealand.

Peter Collignon, an infectious disease expert and microbiologist at the Australian National University Medical School, said it was too early to use death as a basis for comparison, especially because it usually takes some time for someone to die from a virus.

“The problem with using death is that it’s still too early to say,” Professor Collignon told Fact Check.

“The best step is within a few months when they look at death in winter and compare how it exceeds normal winter.”

What about testing levels?

Proportionally, New Zealand in general testing more than Australia.

On April 15, New Zealand tested about four times the rate of Australia, with 0.8 tests per 1000 people, compared with about 0.2 in Australia.

This raises the possibility that higher testing can result in a higher number of confirmed cases, potentially giving the wrong impression that eradication efforts are more successful in Australia.

Another way to illustrate this is by checking the number of tests needed to find one positive case of COVID-19.

On April 15, for example, New Zealand conducted 65 tests for each confirmed positive case.

In Australia, this number is lower, with 59 tests conducted for each positive case detected.

In other words, New Zealand has tested more, but found fewer positive cases.

Professor Collignon said it was difficult to be definitive about testing because it depends on the methodology used, including the criteria applied to determine the suitability of testing.

More than experts

Professor Collignon said Australia and New Zealand both achieved “very similar” results in suppressing the virus.

“One is better than the other depending on how you look,” he said.

“But I think that is important because it means that Australia may have achieved the same results in controlling infections as New Zealand, only in Australia with fewer locking measures and less economic and social impact – but there are still very significant restrictions.”

Professor Collignon said if you take the impact of an outgoing cruise ship, which accounts for about a third of Australia’s cases, then Australia is clearly more successful at suppressing the virus than New Zealand.

Siouxsie Wiles, an infectious disease expert from the University of Auckland, said the numbers in New Zealand and Australia were so low that comparisons like Mr Morrison were not very meaningful.

“Everything is in the noise,” said Associate Professor Wiles.

“This is a long match and we have to wait and see how it goes all year instead of making bold claims about who is responding in the ‘best’ way at the moment.”

Associate Professor Cox said he believed New Zealand was now in a good position to get rid of the virus following the locking steps that were put in place.

“This locking is very important for controlling this disease in New Zealand and we are even in a good position to eliminate it,” said Associate Professor Cox.

Main researcher: Josh Gordon, economics and finance editor, with Caitlin Cassidy

[email protected]

Source

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to search, up and down arrows for volume.

The former crew revealed the coronavirus story above Princess Ruby

.



image source

Match Preview – New Zealand vs Pakistan, RetroLive 2019/20 2020, 1st SF, Benson & Hedges World Cup | Instant News


For the latest in our #RetroLive series, we retreated to March 1992 once again, this time for the first World Cup semi-final that year. Pakistan and New Zealand both have qualifications, taking contrasting routes to KO. The winner of this match will believe that fate is on their side in the final …

Large picture

Destiny called Eden Park tomorrow. The real fairytale is probably what will be revealed in Sydney in two nights, where South Africa – long absent – is still on the right track to return to the international scene with the most extraordinary achievements imaginable. But tell fans of New Zealand or Pakistan, the fighters as the first World Cup semifinals will take place in Auckland – two countries that will have reason to believe that their names are on the trophy if they can reach Melbourne for the main event next week.

The less ambitious one might suggest that New Zealand has won the heart and mind aspect of this World Cup. Their tactics have been victorious – the tactics of opening bowling are no exception Patel’s Pack – while their captain Martin Crowe has been named the Champion Player of the tournament. The prize, a new car, will shine through the sidelines in Eden Park, an inviting target for one of the six more passionate batsmen on display.

And then, of course, there is the bragging rights that New Zealand has secured over their closest and dearest rivals. Australia may be the main host of this World Cup – holding 25 matches to 14 – but they have been eliminated from the main event, their calm never recovered from the defeat Crowe himself gave them at tournament opener in this same land in February.

Crowe’s 100 originals did not come out in the contest which contributed greatly to the current count of 365 runs in eight innings, and were given a score of 13 without compromise for 2 which had included the dismissal of John Wright to the tournament’s first legal submission. And now they have the chance to really rub it into their trans-Tasman friends – another win in front of their host fans, and from New Zealand will go to the MCG with the prospect of lifting the World Cup on Australian soil, and removing defending champions in the most painful way imaginable.

However, of all the teams that New Zealand wants to face at this critical stage of the tournament, the revived Pakistan will be at the bottom of anyone’s list.

After registering victories alone in the first five matches of the tournament, Pakistan needed victory on their own terms in Christchurch, and assistance from Australia in their own struggle to survive against the West Indies. The final match starts a few hours later in Melbourne with both teams knowing that the semi-final slots are still in their grasp, although the Aussies will only qualify if Pakistan slips. Their fate was completely sealed after 45 minutes of their turn, and only the West Indies were to blame failed to hunt a decent target of 212.

What, how to make out of the way Pakistan’s important victory over New Zealand? On the one hand, the Kiwi’s unbeaten end to the match is right, because it guarantees their semi-final at home when they might face the Aussies in Sydney. On the other hand, their tactics and techniques appear to be exposed thoroughly by cornered Imran Khan tigers – at least Wasim Akram, who was crushed with new and old balls, and Mushtaq Ahmed, who blabbered about their full ten allocations in one round in the innings. first. number 2 for 18. If Crowe’s men hide their hands to be rolled for 166 people, they are great cliffs.

Because something is happening in the Pakistan camp now. Imran’s call for their vital victory over Australia has become the cornerstone of the revival campaign, and confidence in their successive victories over Australia, Sri Lanka and New Zealand has become something to behold. Javed Miandad, rarely far from any other squabbling with his captain, has doubled to produce an extraordinary body of work – 322 running at 53.66, with only a solitary score below 30 (in the midst of a critical flight against England in Adelaide). In victory, defeat and destruction, he has given an undeniable class that first makes Pakistan’s hopes flicker and, finally, gives substance to the suspicion that they are changing the tournament their way.

One thing’s for sure. Whoever wins this one will carry the unshakeable belief that, this year, it should be.

Form guide

New Zealand LWWWW (last five games completed, most recent first)

Pakistan WWWLW

In the spotlight

Captain Crowe is the conductor of the Kiwi orchestra, but nothing symbolizes the success of the weaving of his squads better than the allrounder allsort Chris Harris, whose bowling style can’t be explained. Is he a sailor? Not really, a shaken inswinger. Is he a spinner? Well, her wrists roll up every child in a strangely odd way, but it says it’s an injustice to the breed. But does he suck life and momentum out of the middle overs, devouring his spells with calculated simplicity, rushing the batsmen at just the speed he gets through his overs? Certainly. To date, he has put up 15 wickets at 22.93 in the tournament, more than any other bowler, even though he left without goal for the first time in a Pakistan group match. Do they have his size, or does he have a hidden ruse to bear? One thing is certain: Harris is the heart of New Zealand’s fast attack – Dibbly, Dobbly and Wobbly to their friends – and they will need it to provide control.

If fate really plays a role for Pakistan, then how important will a part play Imran Khan played? The captain came to the top of his fifth World Cup campaign – only Miandad could match him there – and he became increasingly talented for his easily influenced youth team. The greatness of his leonine steps and the steps of shipping cartwheeling remain intact in the 40th year, although the shoulders of all accounts depend on a thread, even if you suspect he won’t need it any longer. But as a hitter Imran seems to play the most important role on this side. He has crawled the order with every passing match – from 6 in defeats to India, to 4 and 5 against South Africa and Australia, and finally to 3 against Sri Lanka, where his response to Aamir Sohail’s initial loss was to erect a brick wall with 22 of 69 balls, and trust his talented teammates to release his anxiety. This is a counter-intuitive approach to take, but in taking the risk of stopping on the one hand, he gives his young tiger a license to roar on the other. Can it pay off at the end of the sharpest tournament? We can only wait and see.

Team News

Wright’s return to fitness after his mid-series injury problems means the possibility of a major change in order over New Zealand, with Rod Latham likely to find a way after a series of low scores – especially since Mark Greatbatch has been a revelation with 296 rounds at 49.33 since getting his chance against South Africa. Wright, meanwhile, had scored 0, 57 and 1 – twice bent at his feet in the single-digit match – but his experience of the big match certainly benefited him.

New Zealand (maybe): 1 John Wright, 2 Mark Greatbatch, 3 Andrew Jones, 4 Martin Crowe (captain), 5 Ken Rutherford, 6 Chris Harris, 7 Ian Smith (wk), 8 Dipak Patel, 9 Gavin Larsen, 10 Willie Watson, 11 Danny Morrison.

There is no big responsibility in Pakistan to make changes to the winning lineup so well in Christchurch this week, although given the knot tied by Mushtaq in the Kiwi batsmen, the inclusion of a second speculator in Sikander Raza is a different possibility, especially given the extraordinary angle of Eden Park is outfield and needs to support bowling with additional front-line options. Ijaz Ahmed is most likely the man who made his way. He played alone in Christchurch, where Sohail’s left arm rattled through ten cheap overs.

Pakistan (maybe): 1 Aamer Sohail, 2 Rameez Raja, 3 Imran Khan (captain), 4 Javed Miandad, 5 Inzamam-ul-Haq, 6 Saleem Malik, 7 Wasim Akram, 8 Moin Khan (wk), 9 Sikander Raza, 10 Mushtaq Ahmed, 11 Aaqib Javed

Pitch and conditions

There are different rumors that a heavy thunderstorm will be heading for Auckland tomorrow, with the prospect of a second round match right in the line of fire. And if that’s the case, then the captain who wins the throw won’t hesitate to hit first. The strangeness of the tournament rain rules is such that, even after being refused to 74 in Adelaide by England, Pakistan was given the chance to fight to win the match, thanks to a recalculation that ignored the bowling side’s cheapest overs. Whatever happens, hopefully this semifinal isn’t remembered for the funny end result …

Statistics and trifles

  • With only four teams left in the tournament, Martin Crowe is still on track to finish as a leading World Cup run-scorer. He has 365 of eight innings to date, three fewer than Australian David Boon, whose race runs, but 34 embarrassed Peter Kirsten from South Africa, who can still add to his 399 counts against England tomorrow.

  • Miandad, with 322 running at 53.66 in seven matches so far, has also been running, despite losing his team’s defeats to South Africa, such as Sohail (308) and Rameez Raja (297).

  • Pakistan have won 12 of their 24 ODIs against New Zealand, and lost 11 with one without results. In three previous World Cup meetings, they won 2 and lost 1.

.



image source

Is New Zealand really doing better than Australia in controlling coronavirus? | Instant News


Updated

April 27 2020 6:56:44

Australia and New Zealand are famous for their friendly rivalry, but when deciding which one is better in containing COVID-19, the answer doesn’t seem to be much difference.

Important points:

  • New Zealand’s strategy is to eliminate coronavirus by hard locking, including extensive closure
  • Australia’s strategy is to suppress the virus with partial locking
  • Both countries have been quite successful, with low numbers of infections and deaths

Starting tomorrow, New Zealand will facilitate its hard locking which has restricted most of the population inside the house to a household “bubble” with limited contact with the outside world.

“We have stopped the tide of destruction,” said New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

But does New Zealand really have to try hard?

Locking New Zealand ‘not yet effective’

Both Australia and New Zealand sacrifice parts of their economy for the health of their nation but take a different path.

New Zealand chose a strategy to eliminate the corona virus altogether, ordering the closure of schools, shops, cafes and restaurants widely. Initially, it lasted for at least four weeks.

Australia decided to play a longer game for six months, with its suppression strategy becoming clearer from time to time. Australians are given more freedom than New Zealanders and can still travel socially far to Bunnings or chase a partner to drink coffee and exercise in the park.

Some experts such as Peter Collignon, who advised the Federal Government on infection control, doubted New Zealand’s elimination strategy could be achieved.

“Total lockdown like New Zealand has not been more effective than what Australia has done so far,” he told 7.30.

“I think it is very unlikely we would get rid of this virus without a safe and effective vaccine.”

If the measure of success for New Zealand is the elimination of COVID-19 within four weeks, that has not yet happened.

But New Zealand has reached an enviable downward curve, such as Australia, with the number of confirmed cases and deaths low compared to damage abroad.

Australia has 6,711 cases and 83 deaths. New Zealand has 1,121 cases and 18 deaths.

While Australia’s 25 million population is five times that of New Zealand’s population, official data shows the current overall national case rate in the two countries is similar: Australia is in a slightly better position with around 26 cases per 100,000 people compared to New Zealand’s 30 cases per 100,000 people.

The latest data from the country most affected, the United States, shows several areas there with more than 915 cases per 100,000, according to the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

“Both Australia and New Zealand are success stories,” Professor Collignon said.

New Zealand instructions ‘easy to understand’

Two prime ministers, Scott Morrison and Ms. Ardern, brought their own different leadership and communication styles.

Both announced their restrictions the same week on March 23.

But while Australia’s initial response was marked by late-night media conferences and different messages from states and territories, New Zealand clearly defines its strategy with multilevel warning system a few days before.

The concept is similar to the Australian forest fire warning system with four different levels, from Level 4 Lockdown to Level 1 Prep.

Epidemiologist Tony Blakely said New Zealand was decisive from the start.

Your question about coronavirus answers:

Professor Blakely is an honorary deputy director at the University of Otago and is currently based at the University of Melbourne.

“The New Zealand government very much said, ‘Yes, we are going to Stage 4, as it seems,'” he said.

“Australia hasn’t cut very clearly and a little more, ‘Let’s get into position, grasp, and re-evaluate.'”

For New Zealand, Anita Affleck, who lives in the city of New Plymouth on the North Island, clear instructions provide peace of mind for her family.

“It is very easy to understand and not much decision making is needed,” he said.

While there are ongoing reports from several Australians who break the rules here, Professor Collignon says the whole community has complied.

“Nobody really rebelled on the streets about closing all our pubs, clubs and churches,” said Professor Collignon. “They understand”.

What experts say about coronavirus:

The Ruby Princess Factor

One significant blight on Australian results that should be exemplary is cruise ships.

Despite the announcement of a national ban in mid-March, cruise ships continue to arrive in Australia, leading to an increase in the number of confirmed cases.

The effects of the Princess Ruby disaster, which were docked in Australia and New Zealand, are clearly seen in the picture: more than 600 cases in Australia, and 22 cases in New Zealand, have been linked to cruise ships.

“If we don’t have a cruise,” said Professor Collignon, “our curves will look much better, faster.”

Straight ahead

Large outdoor life seems to be on the horizon for both countries.

After five weeks of locking in, New Zealand will subside from Level 4 restrictions to Level 3, which looks similar to Australia’s current restrictions.

Barista Auckland Jenny Pieroth is one of thousands of New Zealand hospitality workers who are retreating and providing wage subsidies.

He is excited to return to work this week because cafes and restaurants reopen with takeaway payments, social distance, and without contact.

“Half of coffee making is advance time [with customers], “he said.” I missed that interaction. “

Australia has begun to map out a cautious exit strategy but Morrison has warned that the current limits may not be reduced until early May amid fears of a social fatigue that has begun to occur.

There is no government that predicts when our COVID-19 way of life will end, and they are not ready to declare “mission accomplished” first.

Watch this story tonight at 7:30.

What you need to know about coronavirus:

Topic:

covid-19,

diseases and disorders,

health,

Government and politics,

world politics,

scott-morrison,

community and society,

australia,

New Zealand

First posted

April 27 2020 5:59:52

.



image source

Chinese medical experts, New Zealand share firsthand experience of Covid-19 | Instant News


WELLINGTON: Medical experts from China and New Zealand have held a webinar for the first time to exchange experiences and best practices in combating the Covid-19 (coranavirus) outbreak.

During a session held on Saturday (April 18), Nigel Millar, chief medical officer of the New Zealand Southern District Health Council (DHB), said that the timely distribution of Chinese clinical protocols on Covid-19 by the Chinese Consulate in Christchurch has helped medical institutions local virus contains more effective spread.

Chris Fleming, CEO of DHB, emphasized the psychological closeness between the two countries facing the common challenges of a pandemic despite their great geographical distance.

Chinese Consul General in Christchurch Wang Zhijian stressed the importance of the solidarity and collaboration of the international community to combat the common enemy Covid-19.

He noted the progress of the collaboration made in medical science between Shanghai and Dunedin through the sister-city platform in recent years, and expressed hope that the two countries could work together to build a common health community for humanity in this global era.

During the two-hour session, Sun Xiaodong, deputy director of the Shanghai Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Xu Jinfu from the Shanghai Lung Hospital affiliated with Tongji University answered questions raised by frontline medical professionals from Southern DHB, including tracking suspected cases, testing asymptomatic carriers, increase diagnostic accuracy, improve personal protective equipment (PPE) and evaluate cytokine storms.

The event was co-sponsored by the Chinese Consulate General in Christchurch, the Shanghai Foreign Affairs Office, the Shanghai city health commission, and DHB South New Zealand. – Xinhua / Asian News Network

.



image source

The media glorifies the New Zealand government’s pro-business response to this pandemic | Instant News


The media glorifies the New Zealand government’s pro-business response to this pandemic

By
Tom Peters

April 14, 2020

International corporate media praised the response of the Labor government in New Zealand to the COVID-19 pandemic. A Washington Post the April 7 article stated that the country “not only flattened the” infection curve, “it suppressed it.” Similar reports have appeared on CNN, England Guardian, and many other outlets, presenting New Zealand as an example for other countries.

April 12th IndependentAlastair Campbell, former communications director for British Prime Minister Tony Blair, described New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern as “one of, if not the leader, the leader of this crisis,” showing “natural empathy” in his call for people to “be good “With each other. He points to the relatively low number of New Zealand deaths and” just over a thousand “confirmed COVID-19 cases.

Praise for New Zealand from these places – included Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos of the Amazon, and Campbell, one of the most prominent war propagandists in Britain – must give pause to those who have been led to believe that the Ardern government is leading a progressive, “empathic” response to the pandemic.

The government’s priority, in New Zealand and internationally, is to sustain the wealth of super-rich and large businesses, with trillions of dollars in corporate bailouts worldwide. Because this large amount must ultimately be paid for through intensive exploitation of the working class, there is now an increase campaign to force people to go back to work before their safety can be guaranteed.

The Ardern government lockdown was praised by CNN for being “short, sharp and brutal,” implying it could allow a quick return to work, something demanded by the NZ media and business department. Even though the government says it’s four weeks lockdown, which began on March 26, may be extended, Education Minister Chris Hipkins has indicated schools can be reopened as soon as April 29.

There is not enough data to show how close New Zealand is by “pushing” the curve, or stopping the spread of the corona virus in the community. To date, there are 1,366 known cases, 9 deaths and 15 people in hospital.

That Washington Post stressing that “there is little evidence of community transmission” in New Zealand. However, according to the Ministry of Health, only 39 percent of cases are related to overseas travel. Only 2 percent is labeled as “community transmission,” but this only refers to cases with no known source; 48 percent of cases were classified as “existing case contacts,” and 11 percent “are being investigated.”

The number of NZ deaths is relatively small mainly because the majority of cases are among younger people. However, Director General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield has warned that more elderly people may die, with some deaths related to the Rosewood elderly care facility in Christchurch. The government has rejected calls from rest homes for all staff and new admissions to be tested.

The total number of tests carried out was 64,399, in a population of five million. Although this is higher, per capita, than many European and US countries, no country has tested it sufficiently to ascertain how far the virus has spread. Many cases of COVID-19 have no symptoms, and people without symptoms are not being tested.

Delay in school closure, and testing restrictions, led to at least one major extraordinary event centered around Marist College Auckland.

Unlike most countries, New Zealand is locked before anyone dies of COVID-19, following pressure for action from thousands of health workers, teachers, and others. However, while schools and most businesses are now closed, hundreds of thousands of people continue to work and many are at risk. Transportation, health care, food production, and other industries have been considered “essential.”

Thousands of workers in meat processing factories, notorious for unsafe conditions and often injured, sue industrial closure due to lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and social distance measures. The Meat Trade Union plays a key role in working with employers to keep the factory running.

Supermarket workers also spoke in the media about the lack of PPE and pressure to continue working despite previous health problems. Workers at supermarkets in Kaikohe and Hawke Bay have tested positive for the virus.

While the government claims that health care workers have access to appropriate PPE, there are many reports of deficiencies and restrictions. Two nurses who tested positive for COVID-19 said New Zealand Herald they were instructed by Waikato Hospital management to remove masks and protective gowns when dealing with patients who have symptoms of COVID-19. Without adequate protection, hospitals can become centers of disease transmission, as is the case in other countries.

The health care system has been lacking in resources for decades. In 2018, the Ardern government told health workers who went on strike that there was “no money” to meet their demands for a safe level of employment. In an uncontrolled outbreak, hospitals will be quickly overwhelmed, potentially causing tens of thousands of deaths.

The media’s emphasis on the “kindness” and mercy that Ardern hoped would promote the fiction that the entire population was “together.” This message is echoed by trade unions, even as they suppress resistance to wage cuts and layoffs.

Labor Union President Richard Wagstaff said Newsroom on April 12 that unions enjoyed “positive tripartite relations” with business and government and acted “as law enforcement agencies” for the government’s “wage wage” scheme. This scheme has distributed billions of dollars to businesses affected by the pandemic, while allowing them to cut wages by 20 percent or more.

Nationalist Daily blog, which is funded by three trade unions, has praised its praise for the government. Editor Martyn Bradbury stated on April 6 that Ardern “deserved double the salary for the extraordinary leadership he had shown during this event.”

Pseudo-left International Socialist Organization, yang support Labor government, said on March 22 that pro-business was $ 12.1 billion bailout The package is “praiseworthy in its Keynesian approach” and he expects a policy “far more progressive and brave” in the future. On March 25, the group published another article praising Ardern’s “social-democratic” response to the pandemic, in contrast to “neoliberal” governments around the world.

In fact, while people who work remain most at risk of contracting the virus, they are also asked to pay for the economic crisis triggered by the pandemic, which Auckland Mayor Phil Goff has described as the worst since the Great Depression.

Finance Minister Grant Robertson has acknowledged that “generations” of workers will pay off debt from government business subsidies and tax deductions. Green Party co-leader, James Shaw, who is part of the government, told TVNZ on April 12: “Our children and perhaps our grandchildren will pay back the debt that we are currently preparing to overcome this crisis for many people. . , decades. “

Of course, as everyone knows, the children of super rich people will continue to prosper. In addition to the bailout, Reserve Bank will spend up to $ 33 billion on quantitative easing operations, which aim to flow cash into the financial markets.

The financial elite don’t have to work and can isolate themselves with style. New Zealand real estate agents have reported increased demand from billionaires around the world who are looking for luxury “bolt holes” to “overcome” the pandemic.

Meanwhile, the government said unemployment would reach “double digits,” while some economists said it could rise by up to 30 percent. Already tens of thousands of people have been forced to give to charity; the demand for the Wellington City Mission food package has increased by 400 percent, and other cities have reported similar increases.

Workers must reject the lie that the New Zealand Labor-led government represents a “better” or more egalitarian response to a pandemic. Contrary to the Labor Party and trade unions, and their pseudo-cheerleaders, the Socialist Equality Group (NZ) urges workers to take the fight for a true revolutionary socialist response to the crisis. Banks and big businesses must be taken over, with tens of billions of dollars diverted to the public health care system and to meet the immediate needs of the population for decent work and living standards.

The author also recommends:

After the right-wing terror attack, the New York Times glorified New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

[21 March 2019]

The New Zealand government says unemployment will reach “double digits”

[9 April 2020]

Selected statement about coronavirus pandemic

Blog comments supported by Disqus ->

.



image source