Tag Archives: palace

Bagai’s family asks PM to save his palace | Instant News


The Bagai family have written to Prime Minister Imran Khan asking him to stop the demolition of the historic Bagai palace in the city of Dera Ismail Khan. Khyber-Pakthunkhwa (KP).

Her family now lives in India. The Bagai Palace commonly known as Bagai Mahal was built in the late 1800’s by Seth Das Ram Bagai within the old walled city of Dera. Bagais are zamindar or top landlords and business families in a region whose wealth has become a local legend.

It was like being at the top of Dera’s social order under the British Raj. They built embankments to save the city from the annual floods and also founded the Veda College in Dera using their own money to rival the Peshawar Islamic College. Their luxurious residence is one of the last memorials of this super rich family but was recently purchased by a private group and dismantled despite concerns from the local community.

Her family fled to India after separation leaving all their land and wealth behind in the face of deadly anti-Hindu riots.

“I am writing to draw your immediate attention to the demolition of the heritage site at Dera Ismail Khan -“ How Expensive ”despite the extraordinary efforts of the Department of Archeology to preserve it. The community has created a lot of agitation to stop the demolition and is willing to protest if given the opportunity to preserve their heritage, ”said the letter, a copy of which is available on The Express Tribune.

“Currently, the Bagai family has asked the KP government to stop the demolition, but the mafia and land grabbers don’t seem to budge and continue to destroy Bagai Mahal. This site can be utilized by creating a museum that includes a library and preserving several artifacts that will prove to be tourist objects, symbols of culture.

The Bagai family have also agreed to contribute to the recovery by all means and resources possible.

The clock is ticking and the culprit is proven immoral. Therefore, with all due respect and sad hearts full of hope, we humbly ask, please help us in saving this heritage site which if damaged will never be restored, ”said the letter written by Attul Bagai and other family members.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 26th, 2021.


image source

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s popularity fell in the UK after Oprah’s interview – but rising in the US, polls show | Instant News

Top line

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s popularity in the UK has fallen to new lows after the couple voiced complaints about the royal family in a recent interview with Oprah Winfrey. YouGov Poll found, but the opposite happened in the US, where a Morning Consult poll showed the couple’s primetime interviews made Americans view the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from a much more favorable perspective.

Key facts

The YouGov poll found that Markle has a net liking rating of -27 – down from -14 last week – with 31% of Britons having a positive opinion of him and 58% viewing him negatively.

Harry now has a net negative rating for the first time, with 45% of Britons viewing it positively and 48% negatively – a 15-point drop from Harry’s +12 net rating on March 5.

This pairing was much more favorable among young people in the UK: Harry and Markle were viewed positively by 59% and 55% of 18-24 year olds, compared to only 27% and 13% of those over 65.

A Polling Morning Consult of 2,220 pre-interview and 838 post-interview US adults found that the share of Markle’s favorable views jumped from 45% to 67% after the Oprah interview, and those with unfavorable views increased only slightly from 14% to 18%.

Harry’s popularity with American respondents jumped from 46% to 69%, and those with negative views increased only slightly from 10% to 14%.

Morning Consult also conducted a poll of 1,001 British adults after the interview, which ranked Meghan the lowest of any member of the royal family – 29% viewed her well and 52% viewed her unfavorably – while 38% of Britons like Harry and 43% have a negative view.


Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip’s net liking ratings with Americans also rose after the interview by a smaller margin, while Kate Middleton and Prince Charles’ ratings dropped slightly and Prince William remained the same at +33. In the UK YouGov poll, only Prince Charles experienced a noticeable drop in popularity after the interview, from 57% watched well to 49%.

Big Numbers

63%. That’s the percentage of British respondents to the YouGov poll who believe the country should still have a monarchy – down from 67% in October 2020 – while 25% want an elected head of state. Britons aged 18-24 are the only age group that prefers elected leaders to monarchs, although the 42% to 37% split is still within the poll’s error threshold.

Key Background

The two-hour interview with Winfrey featured a number of negative claims about the royal family. Couple claimed Family members have expressed “concern” about the color of their son Archie – Markle is mixed race – and the Duchess of Sussex. leaked he suffered suicidal thoughts during his time with the royal family and was denied mental health assistance from the royal institutions. A statement from the palace and Queen Elizabeth II said the royal family was “saddened” to hear of the couple’s experience and described the racial accusations as “worrying,” adding, “Although some memories may differ, they are taken very seriously and will be handled by the family privately.” when Markle did faced controversy in England, as Times of London It was reported that ahead of Oprah’s broadcast, the Duchess reportedly bullied her current staff members with the royal family, alleging that the palace is now investigate. A spokesman for Markle denied the claims against him and said he was “saddened by the latest attacks on his character.”

Further reading

The public’s oprah about Harry and Meghan fell to new lows after Oprah’s interview (YouGov)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Got Popularity After Oprah’s Interview (Morning Consultation)

Buckingham Palace Responding to Oprah Harry and Meghan’s Bombshell Interview (Forbes)

Meghan Markle ‘sad’ with allegations of bullying royal staff ‘To The Point of Tears’ ahead of Oprah TV interview (Forbes)

‘The Woke Crowd Will Think They’ve Canceled Me’: Piers Morgan Defends Critical Coverage by Meghan Markle (Forbes)


image source

Key to Meghan and Harry’s tour of Australia and New Zealand for the alleged bullying dispute | Instant News

As disputes over Meghan’s claims of oppressive royal aides escalate, Sussexes’ tour of Australia and New Zealand in 2018 has emerged as the epicenter of the disintegration of relations between the couple and Buckingham Palace.

The royal family has launched an investigation into allegations that Meghan was bullying the staff, following reports the royals left “a lot of broken people”.

The 39-year-old vehemently denies the accusations, which come ahead of her Oprah interview, saying the palace is using the media to peddle “a completely false narrative.”

A growing stream of claims from anonymous royal sources paints a picture of rising tensions and clashes between the former actor and staff during his 16-day October 2018 tour of Australia, New Zealand, Tonga and Fiji with Prince Harry just months after their marriage.

“The Australian tour is one of the most important in the kingdom’s world but there have long been allegations of clashes with staff,” a source told The Sun.

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex posing in Auckland in October 2018.Photo / Pool / Getty Images
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex posing in Auckland in October 2018.Photo / Pool / Getty Images

“If this assistant advances, it will become the center of the oppression investigation in the palace. That is a critical time.”

Those claims include Meghan becoming annoyed at being given only the wing of the Admiralty House, the Australian Governor-General’s official Sydney residence, rather than the entire property. On another occasion, he reportedly lost his temper with an assistant and a hot drink was dropped.

The trip appears to have highlighted the gulf between the reality of royal duties and the hopes of the former Suits star, who told Oprah in an interview this week that “the construction of” court life “is different than I think one might imagine.”

When Meghan learned that hundreds of people were waiting outside the Sydney Opera House to welcome the newlyweds, the duchess reportedly said to the team: “What are they doing here? This is ridiculous.”

The source told The Times that Meghan was told: “They are here because they admire and support the king and the institutions you represent”, adding: “She doesn’t understand.”

The cracks forming on the royal facade at the Opera House echo a scene in 1983 when Princess Diana was photographed crying there during her tour with Prince Charles, overwhelmed by attention. As Harry told Oprah this week, his biggest fear is “history repeats itself.”

But there are important differences between Diana and naive Meghan – who described herself as “an adult leading a truly independent life” before she was pushed into a tightly controlled royal environment.

On the same trip, during a Fiji market tour, Meghan was spotted by several reporters throwing a tantrum at an aide. Royal Daily Mail correspondent Rebecca English said she witnessed the royals “turning and ‘hissing’ at a member of his party, who was clearly angry about something, and demanded to leave”.

The player, now 39, reportedly argued with his aides at some point during Australia.  Photo / Getty Images
The 39-year-old is reportedly arguing with his aides at some point during Australia. Photo / Getty Images

English added: “I then saw that – a woman – a very depressed staff member sitting in the official car, with tears streaming down her face. Our eyes met and she lowered hers, humiliation etched on her face.

“At that time I could not document anything because I could not conclusively link the two incidents, despite my suspicions. I later learned from other sources that my instincts were right.”

The duchess – who recently announced that she is pregnant with her first child in Australia – was thrown off the market by security officers after she whispered to a bodyguard. At that time, the reason given for its sudden walk was because the area was hot and crowded.

But The Times reports that Meghan is concerned about the presence of UN Women, the group she has previously worked with to promote women’s empowerment. Her lawyer denies this and says she meets other UN Women’s leaders on the trip.

The newspaper’s royal correspondent also described seeing the royals “appearing to have sharp words with his aides”.

Investigations into the bullying allegations against Meghan will focus on her Sussexes Australia tour in October 2018.Photo / Getty Images
Investigations into the bullying allegations against Meghan will focus on her Sussexes Australia tour in October 2018.Photo / Getty Images

Meghan’s personal assistant Melissa Toubati resigned a month after the tour.

He is one of the former aides labeled the “Sussex Survivor’s Club”, who is allegedly “kicked out” from the palace.

Samantha Cohen, an Australian who is assistant to the Queen’s personal secretary and remains Harry and Meghan’s personal secretary, left the post in 2019.

Jason Knauf, who was communications secretary for Harry, Meghan, William and Kate until the couple set up separate offices two years ago, will be a key figure in the investigation. He reportedly sent at least one colleague an email about the alleged bullying at the time.

As Meghan and Harry’s interview airs, this unhappy affair is still a long way off, with reports that the couple could be stripped of their titles as Duke and Duchess of Sussex – one step ahead of the recent “Sandringham Summit” agreement in which they lost various protection and titles in their departure as working aristocrats.

The ongoing war is unfavorable to both sides, with the Sussex family accusing the palace of “a calculated smear campaign based on misleading and dangerous information”, even as royal sources continue to brief The Times on how Meghan “was never ready for royal life” – another claim he denies.

There may be one anonymous comment in a British newspaper in which the Californian – who has faced isolation, arrogance, racism and relentless criticism from the press while in England – will agree: “Meghan doesn’t understand what she’s letting herself in for, and why should he? “


image source

A house for the poor will be made in place of Khokhar, Jati Umrah Palaces: Gill – Pakistan | Instant News

Published in January 30, 2021 13.28

The government has reclaimed occupied land worth more than Rs 1 billion, said Shahbaz Gill.

LAHORE (Dunya News) – Special Assistant to the Prime Minister of Political Communication Dr. Shahbaz Gill said on Saturday that homes for the poor will be built from now onwards, not in Khokhar Palace and Jati Umrah.

SAPM spoke to media and said the government had reclaimed over Rs 1 billion worth of occupied land and would make homes for the poor on it. All the thieves are united and their protests will continue for the next three years, he said.

“Prime Minister Imran Khan has clarified that he is not going to make a deal with them. The prime minister is against those who bargain for power and is the only leader who will not compromise.

Deputy President of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Maryam Nawaz said Saif ul Malook was a party asset. Only thieves, robbers, and land occupation mafia can become assets of Maryam’s father.

“Coal power plants are obsolete in the world but PML-N built them on the fertile land of Sahiwal. Nowhere in the world can generate electricity directly from coal. “


image source

Government, Opp exchange thorns on top of Khokhar Palace, NAB | Instant News

ISLAMABAD: The government and the opposition on Friday argued with each other in the National Assembly over the Khokhar Palace issue and in the Senate over the performance of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

PML-N members filed a protest in the National Assembly after Chairman Asad Qaisar upheld his verdict on a privilege motion seeking to transfer to Malik Afzal Khokhar against taking state land allegedly occupied by lawmakers in Lahore.

PML-N members gathered in front of the speaker’s stage after he announced his decision to recognize the right motion to refer him to the Rights Committee. This situation forced the speaker to postpone the trial until Monday afternoon.

PML-N speaker and MP Ahsan Iqbal was involved in verbal clashes twice when the latter was denied a chance. Ahsan while filing a protest with the chairman said that the speaker allowed the ministers to insult opposition members and their privilege motions were not served.

“Is this the way to speak in the DPR. You also remain a minister and call yourself a professor, ”the speaker in his immediate reaction said as PML-N raised Na Manzoor’s slogan while the speaker reserved his decision on a privilege motion.

Afzal Khokhar, currently challenging allegations by the parliamentary affairs adviser, said he and his family members were bona fide land buyers, demanding that the privilege motion be referred to the Rights Committee where he would produce evidence. “The actions against my family were carried out to serve political motives and as an attempt to change loyalty,” he said.

The PML-N member said his legal property was destroyed while Prime Minister Imran Khan’s massive property in Bani Gala was arranged for a payment of only Rs 1.2 million. “I was harassed so I couldn’t participate in the process in the DPR,” he said, demanding that legal counsel apologize to him for the accusations leveled against him.

As Afzal Khokhar spoke, his colleague and party spokesman Marriyum Aurgenzeb took the seat next to him, prompting him to speak out against the prime minister and mentioning the Zaman Park residence and his sewing machine business. “If I am a Qabza group, Imran Khan is also a Qabza group,” said Khokhar. Under the dictation of Marriyum Aurengzeb, he said he did not occupy land to build a Taman Zaman residence or take funds from the government to buy sewing machines.

Meanwhile, speaking to media people outside the assembly, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi said the government used cruel measures such as destroying the homes of girls and sisters. He said the speaker did not even recognize Afzal Khokhar’s privilege motion and referred the same to the Rights Committee. He said Imran Khan did not even know the details of the Transparency International report on increasing corruption in Pakistan and believed what his advisors said that the report was based on previous government data.

Prime Minister Dr Babar Awan’s adviser against the privilege motion said there was no law that would allow constitutional institutions to protect land mafias. Counsel when citing Rules 31 and 97 said both rules prohibit the acceptance of a motion of rights especially when an issue is in court proceedings. He said that if according to opposition members, the matter was in court proceedings, according to rule 31, subjective matters could not be brought to parliament. He said the Lahore High Court had recognized the government’s plea that it wanted to take action to take state land and there was also no civil court order.

The adviser said action against the land mafia was taken during the day and 45 canals of state land had been found. He said there were only 10 large Qabza groups in Punjab and they were building colonies and gas stations. He said the privilege motion was unacceptable because it was not a matter of rights or rights of anyone, adding that the DPR could not provide protection against any criminal acts.

Babar Awan said democracy and land mafia cannot coexist. “There are political actors who stand with the threat of the land mafia making threats to the institutions,” he said.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Adviser for Accountability and Home Affairs Shahzad Akbar on Friday informed the National Assembly that the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and Asset Recovery Unit (ARU) made a recovery of Rs339.33 billion in the past two years.

He said the ARU, consisting of representatives of NAB, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), was established to carry out the recovery of illegal assets abroad.

Responding to additional inquiries at the hour of inquiry, Shahzad Akbar said that NAB recovered Rs290 billion while ARU recovered Rs37 billion from illegal foreign assets in the two years since it was founded in September 2018.ARU has so far detected illegal foreign assets worth Rs318 billion.

Shahzad Akbar told the DPR that the Pakistani government currently has no working relationship with Broadsheet. He recalled an agreement signed with Broadsheet during 2000 which continued until 2003. He said the contract between the government and Broadsheet was drawn up in 2008 for a payment of 1.5 million dollars.

Meanwhile, the government and the opposition in the Senate are at loggerheads over the performance of NAB, as the DPR was told that a total of Rs481 billion had recovered in the last 10 years, including Rs390 billion over the past two years.

The DPR is given categorical guarantees that frontline health workers, then health workers and the elderly, and not politicians, ministers, judges or generals or bureaucrats are the government’s top priority for COVID-19 vaccination.

In a question and answer session, regarding the dismantling of the recovery, State Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Ali Muhammad Khan said that NAB’s performance could be measured by the amount recovered during the incumbent’s two years of rule, which did nothing but allow anti-corruption. body to work free from any pressure or distraction.

However, this statement was not welcomed by some opposition senators, including PML-N’s Muhammad Javed Abbasi, who insisted that restoration was possible due to voluntary return and plea bargaining, while the Supreme Court has rejected the voluntary return option. He also questioned bargaining options as well. He is also looking for data on how many NAB cases have achieved their logical goals and are recovering by court order.

To that end, the Minister emphasized that what was done was in accordance with the law.

Senate Chairman Muhammad Sadiq Sanjrani refused to hand over the matter to the DPR committee concerned and ordered the provision of information requested by Senator Abbasi regarding the resolution of the corruption case.

Shahzad Akbar, who at the time, was heading to the DPR, rose to clarify that the questions and answers during the trial process were not a decision and added that the appeal defense had passed court trials in the Asfandyar Wali case and judicial oversight and then after the high court reported the decision, voluntary repatriation have been done.

Through a call attention notice, PML-N Senator Mushahid Hussain Syed raised what he called a humanitarian issue apart from having a legality aspect and it was a protest staged by around 250 teachers from the Federal Directorate of Education over the past two years, three weeks in Islamabad, including female teachers. , worked in a federal capital agency as a representative under marriage policy.

He said a delegation of opposition senators had visited the protesting teachers to show solidarity with them, who have been teaching here for the past 10-15 years and are now being sent back to their parent department in the province, splitting their families as if. He gave an example, the marriage policy received legal protection in 2012.

Minister Ali Muhammad Khan said the government was doing what it could within the limits of the law, to provide assistance to teachers. He added that under the law, the teachers have worked here as representatives for five years and an extension of their stay is only possible by obtaining an NOC. [no objection certificate] from its parent department.

The ministry concerned, he said, had received several letters from the provincial education department requesting the return of teachers from the FDE in view of their urgent requirements in their respective provinces and after they had passed their five-year legal period.

He explained that some got the NOC and those, who couldn’t, went to the Islamabad High Court for help in 2020 and that same year the court issued a very strong decision, asking for their repatriation, which the NOC did not issue, otherwise it would be inefficiency. and federal department delinquency and misconduct.

Afterwards, he noted that these teachers chose to appeal intra-court and had been admitted to the IHC and therefore the problem was the sub-court and once the court announced its decision it would be implemented.

Opposition leader Raja Muhammad Zafarul Haq strongly supported the teachers’ case and suggested that the government review it and the DPR committee also provide direction to the government on this matter, as it is a serious humanitarian issue, asking for an effective one. solution.

DPR leader Dr Shahzad Waseem said that the federal minister for national education is concerned about this issue and wants a friendly solution to it and also considers several options.


image source