Tag Archives: PATENT

German Supreme Court Sides Solvay in Patent Case With Neo | Business | Instant News

HANNOVER, Germany – (BUSINESS WIRE) – 14 Apr 2021–

On April 6, 2021, the German Federal Court (Bundesgerichtshof) ruled in favor of Solvay in the patent cancellation case filed by Neo Chemicals & Oxides (Europe) Ltd. against patents relating to recent ceric oxide products consisting of catalysts to minimize emissions. next-generation automotive engines, and catalysts comprising ceric oxide products.

The appeal case in the German Federal Court (Bundesgerichtshof) overturned the cancellation decision by the Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) in January 2019 regarding the German designation of patent EP 1 435 338 B1. This appeal decision is final and conclusive (file number X ZR 54/19 – BGH).

The Mannheim Regional Court (Landgericht Mannheim) decided in December 2017 that Neo Chemicals & Oxides (Europe) Ltd. (“Neo”) has infringed Solvay’s patent by supplying certain cerium oxide materials in Germany. In its judgment, the Mannheim court barred Neo and two of its directors from offering, marketing, using, or importing (or owning for that reason) infringing products in Germany. The court further held that Neo was responsible for damages in connection with their past sale of the infringing ceric oxide product and needed to provide a tally of the infringing activity. Neo appealed the decision to the High District Court (Oberlandesgericht) in Karlsruhe in January 2018. The infringement appeal has been adjourned by the Karlsruhe Court pending a Federal Court decision. With its final validity and conclusively established, the German infringement appeal process will continue. In addition, Solvay will seek compensation for patent infringement in German courts.

As previously announced, British courts in two cases also found the patents valid and infringed by Neo. Another British court case is underway to determine the amount of damages Neo must pay Solvay based on this offense.

Neo is part of the Chemicals and Oxides segment of the Neo Performance Materials Inc. group. The Chemicals and Oxides Segment production facilities are located in Zibo, China, and Sillamäe, Estonia.

Respect for intellectual property rights is essential for free and fair competition. Solvay will continue to take action to enforce its rights against offenders. Solvay will help its customers to solve any difficulties caused by Neo conformity risk.

About Solvay

Solvay is a science company whose technology benefits many aspects of everyday life. With more than 23,000 employees in 64 countries, Solvay engages people, ideas and elements to reinvent progress. The Group strives to create shared, sustainable value for all, especially through its Solvay One Planet plan, which is structured around three pillars: protecting the climate, conserving resources and fostering a better life. The Group’s innovative solutions contribute to safer, cleaner and more sustainable products found in homes, food and consumer goods, aircraft, cars, batteries, smart devices, healthcare applications, water and air purification systems. Founded in 1863, Solvay today ranks among the world’s top three companies for most of its activities and generates net sales of € 9 billion in 2020. Solvay is listed on Euronext Brussels (SOLB) and Paris and in the United States, where the company The stock (SOLVY) is traded via the Level I ADR program. Learn more at www.solvay.com.

Follow us on Twitter @SolvayGroup

See the source version at businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210414005292/en/

CONTACT: Media Relations Peter Boelaert


[email protected] Stellbrink

+49 T + 49511857 ​​2446

[email protected]



SOURCE: Solvay

Business Wire Copyright 2021.

PUB: 04/14/2021 03:00 AM / DISC: 04/14/2021 03:01


Business Wire Copyright 2021.


image source

Apple may soon develop a reconfigurable solid-state keyboard for the MacBook | Instant News

Apple has been awarded patent It describes a MacBook with a solid-state keyboard that uses a full-touch surface that can be reconfigured according to user needs. Therefore, if you use numbers and want to use a large numeric keypad, or as an artist, you may need a larger drawing area, and you should be able to reconfigure the keyboard accordingly.

According to reports, there is a large amount of evidence that Apple’s long-term goal for the MacBook is to replace the mechanical keyboard with a touch-sensitive surface.

These plans obviously have their own limitations. The iPad type keyboard does not allow touch input, and typing on the glass keyboard for a long time is uncomfortable. However, Apple also has patents designed to solve these problems.

Apple has proposed a three-dimensional approach that can make a screen-based keyboard look like a physical keyboard. The first method is to allow the flexible screen to change shape when the virtual key is pressed, use tactile feedback to simulate the click of a real key, and finally use static charge to simulate the feeling of the edge of the key, so because when you put your finger on the keyboard, It feels like a real keyboard.

Apple took the first step in this direction as early as 2015, when they replaced the mobile trackpad surface with Force Touch, which simulates a click, such as 9to5Mac Pointed out.

When it comes to making virtual keyboards look like real keyboards, the latest patents involving solid-state keyboards do face huge challenges, but Apple believes that if this is to be achieved, it will bring huge benefits.

According to Apple, mechanical keyboards are prone to failure and face the problem of fragments being trapped inside (just like the butterfly keyboard that Apple is currently filing for a class action lawsuit).

Traditional input devices on laptops (such as keyboards and trackpads) are easily damaged, and because the collected debris can damage internal components, if the device becomes very bad, it will make the device unusable. The mechanical structure is also prone to fall and be subject to mechanical shocks.

Then, the solid-state method provides the option to adjust the keyboard and trackpad layout to suit what the user is doing at the current point in time. In some cases, opening a particular application may automatically change the keyboard to suit its input requirements.

To be honest, most people will and will be careful to replace their own appropriate keyboard, Apple is aware of this, and may eventually adopt a hybrid approach, that is, the space on the keyboard can be reconfigured. (Patent for Apple)

The configurable, force-sensitive input structure can be adapted to various input devices for gadgets, and is not limited to keyboards, numeric keypads or touchpads. The gadget in question can utilize a single input structure to create multiple different input devices, or it can include multiple input structures to form different input devices.

The input device on the force-sensitive input structure can be customized, and the input device can be moved to different positions on the housing according to the user’s preference. “Similarly, the size or shape of one or more of these input devices can be adjusted through user input, operation of associated electronic devices, software, firmware, other hardware, etc.” According to the plan, the configurable input can also make symbols or The emoji keyboard is operated separately from the alphanumeric keyboard.

To be honest, most people will and will be careful to replace their own appropriate keyboard, Apple is aware of this, and may eventually adopt a hybrid approach, that is, the space on the keyboard can be reconfigured.

“The electronic device may include a contact portion formed of a flexible (or partially flexible) material that can be bent or deformed into and/or brought into contact with a portion of the input stack. For example, the contact portion may be The metal sheet or part of the metal housing of the electronic device. Since the input force is applied to the corresponding contact portion of the electronic device, the input stack can capacitively sense the deformation of the contact portion.”

As with all patents, Apple will not create it or call it overnight.


image source

Big Tech Wants To Change Patent Laws in Germany, a Popular Place for Litigation | Instant News

Now, a coalition of German blue-chip companies and foreign multinationals, including major US technology companies, is pushing for laws that will reduce the country’s appeal to those wanting to assert their intellectual property.

Germany’s major patent courts, in Munich, Mannheim and Düsseldorf, systematically order orders, or temporary sales bans, for products subject to a patent lawsuit. That makes them attractive legal venues for patent holders.

The primary targets of the legislation are so-called non-practical entities, or NPEs, that accumulate a portfolio of patents they license instead of using them in their own products. Critics call them patent trolls.

The proposed rules aim to make it harder for plaintiffs to win court decisions. The initiative has divided Germany’s usually united business community, pitting some of the country’s biggest patent users against its biggest patent holders.

Volkswagen AG



Deutsche Telekom AG

and others support the bill.

Bayer AG


Siemens AG

and BASF SE has opposed it.

Foreign companies have joined. Apple, Samsung,

Nvidia Corp.


Microsoft Corp.

, among others, have joined European lobby groups pushing for the move. On the other hand are similar companies

3M Together.


Panasonic Corp.



A band

Nokia Corp.

, which over the years has accumulated many patent libraries.

Multinational corporations often steer cases to lucrative legal venues around the world using their remote subsidiaries. Patent litigators say the ability to get a court order could be key for patent holders choosing jurisdiction for a lawsuit.

“In the German legal tradition, if you are doing something you shouldn’t be doing, then first you have to stop,” said Florian Mueller, an independent intellectual property analyst. “Repair is an afterthought.”

Such orders are more difficult to enforce in the US, following changes in law and a series of Supreme Court decisions. This is especially so if the plaintiff is an NPE. Other friendly legal venues for patent holders have emerged outside the US, including China, Turkey and Russia, all of which have established frameworks for intellectual property protection.

Germany’s almost automatic orders, its large consumer market, and the fast working speed of its patent courts compared to other European countries have made it the venue of choice for some of the biggest patent fights in the West.

“Germany has undeniably become a haven for patent trolls.”

– Deutsche Telekom executive Stephan Altmeyer

In December 2018, a court in Munich ordered Apple to stop selling some iPhone models after the chipmaker

Qualcomm Inc.

filed a lawsuit, alleging that a fellow California company had infringed on Qualcomm’s patents on the iPhone modem chip. That command forced Apple to briefly deliver a custom made phone to Germany. Both the company then settled down.

The previous year, chip maker

Broadcom Inc.

sued Volkswagen and its Audi subsidiary, accusing the automaker of infringing Broadcom’s patents in navigation and entertainment systems. Rather than risk an order that would stop production, Volkswagen paid nearly 500 million euros, the equivalent of about $ 598 million, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Volkswagen declined to comment on the settlement. Broadcom did not respond to a request for comment.

Proponents of the proposed law say that Germany’s patent law, which has its roots in the 19th century, is out of date. When Carl Benz received a patent for his car in 1886, “it was one patent for one product,” said Ludwig von Reiche, managing director of Nvidia in Germany. He heads Germany’s IP2Innovate branch, the European lobby group that pushed for the bill.

Today’s increasingly digital vehicles may involve more than 100,000 patents on everything from internet connectivity, sensors and algorithms to individual microchip circuits, he said.

Proponents of the bill say the current system puts too much pressure on companies to choose expensive solutions. They also said the changes would curb the NPE, which they accuse of preying on the company in German courts to increase licensing fees from its sometimes large patent portfolio.

“Germany has undeniably become a haven for patent trolls,” said Stephan Altmeyer, vice president of patent strategy at Deutsche Telekom.

Lawsuits in the European Union pursued by the NPE tripled between 2011 and 2017 – the last year for which figures were available – according to


a data provider that tracks intellectual property litigation. In Germany, one-fifth of patent cases were brought by the NPE in that period, compared with 4% to 6% in other European countries.

The bill currently being processed in the German parliament was drafted by Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government last year but has undergone changes following pressure from lobbyists on both sides. Proponents of the reshuffle hope the law can be adopted before general elections in September. Failure to do so could force subsequent governments to restart projects from scratch.

The law will require judges to carry out a proportionality check before rendering a decision, to ensure that the charges charged against the offender do not massively exceed the revenue claimed by the claiming party. It will also force courts to consider the impact of court orders on third parties – customers whose telephone service will be interrupted, for example, or patients who may not be given life-saving drugs.

It also promises to overcome the peculiarities of the German legal system. Patent infringement cases are handled in regional courts, which can reach a decision in less than one year. But a patent invalidity lawsuit – which tests whether the patents claimed by the plaintiffs are actually valid and is the preferred defense of companies sued for infringement – goes through the special German patent courts, which can take up to three times as long to render a decision.

The NPE says the planned changes are worrying. A ban on sales that the court imposed during the litigation level on the ground, they said. The order could “bring large companies to the negotiating table,” Pio Suh, managing director of IPCom GmbH, Germany’s NPE owned by Fortress Investment Group LLC, a New York-based investment management firm.

The pharmaceutical industry is particularly worrying, where investments to develop new drugs can run into billions of euros and patent infringements could wipe out revenue from certain drugs within months, according to industry executives, creating a strong disincentive to innovation.

Bill critics also argue that since damage in Germany is lower than in the US, and punitive damages do not exist at all, removing the automated order would skew the system and remove most of the barriers to abuses.

“It’s like making a fine for the fare of avoiding ticket prices,” said Beat Weibel, chief intellectual property advisor at Siemens. “We need serious consequences such as automated orders to balance the system.”

Write to Bertrand Benoit at [email protected]

Copyright © 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8


image source

Initiative By Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office – BPTO Contributes To Heating Up Licensing and Transfer of Market Technology in Countries – Intellectual Property | Instant News

Brazil: Initiative By Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office – BPTO Contributes To Heating Licensing And Technology Transfer Market In The Country

To print this article, you only need to register or login at Mondaq.com.

In recent months, despite the challenging situation of the global economic scenario, the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office – BPTO [National Institute of Industrial Property – INPI] has adopted initiatives that seek to reduce the time it takes to examine patent applications (backlog) and aim to encourage investment and the development and commercialization of new technologies. Among these initiatives is the INPI Regulation no. 294/2020, INPI no. 247/2020 and INPI no. 331/2020, which comes into effect throughout the second half of this year and could contribute to stimulating patent licensing and technology transfer in the country.

Based on the pilot project stipulated by the INPI Ordinance no. 294/2020, as of September 2020, two new types of priority prosecutions for patent applications have been made, one for technology available in the market and the other for technology resulting from public financing. Accordingly, provided certain conditions are complied with, patent applications that are subject to license, assignment, import or export agreements, qualify for priority inspection. The same is the case with technology derived from projects developed with financial support derived from public revenues.

In addition, with a clear and clear objective of facilitating technology transfer and licensing of industrial property assets, BPTO has also launched an “IP Showcase” project, to encourage licensing offers stipulated in Article 64 and so on. of Industrial Property Law. This project was instituted by the INPI Ordinance no. 331/2020, which, as was the case in countries such as the United States, Denmark, Japan and Chile, as of October 1, 2020, established a platform for the publication of announcements regarding industrial property assets for sale.

Both patents granted by BPTO and patent applications that are still in the process of analysis can be offered in the IP Showcase, while several other requirements must be considered, including confirmation by the applicant that the technology in question is not the subject of an exclusive license agreement. . Although it only started with patent offers and patent applications, the hope is that other industrial property assets, such as industrial design, computer programs, integrated circuit topography, and trademarks, can be gradually offered to the market through IP showcases provided by BPTO. Thus, the IP showcase creates a very favorable space for the supply and demand of technology solutions in the market, enabling potential interested parties in the solution to have knowledge of the products and processes available and to initiate negotiations with the respective owners.

Another incentive measure that should be highlighted is the INPI Ordinance No. 247/2020, which entitles startups (as defined in the Complementary Law No. 167/2019) to request priority and expedited examination of their patent applications at the BPTO. This move aims to stimulate the development of new technologies and investment by startups to protect their innovation through patent applications, which have the potential to stimulate investment in startups in the country itself.

Source: IBEF Magazine Nov / Dec 2020

The contents of this article are intended to provide general guidance on the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your particular circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLE ABOUT: Intellectual Property from Brazil

Annuity Payment System In Mexico

Becerril Coca & Becerril

In accordance with the Mexican Patent and Trademark Act in Mexico, to maintain valid patent registrations, industrial designs and utility models throughout their lifetime, payment of a maintenance fee is required.

Patent Comparison Guide

Venturini IP

Patent Comparison Guide for Brazilian jurisdictions, see our section on comparative guides for comparisons across countries

Start working

Luiz Leonardos & Advogados

Patent owners are theoretically required to work on their invention in Brazil, or run the risk of a compulsory license awarded to competitors, but the situation is complicated …


image source

New patent reveals that the first Sonos headset will be available later in 2021 | Instant News

High-end audio company Sonos has stated that it plans to launch some new products this year. After the new speakers quietly appeared, we now see a pair of unreleased Sonos headphones.

If they are put into production (seemingly possible prospects at this stage), the headset will be Sonos’ first product and is expected to enter a highly competitive market.

read more:

Given the premium features of other Sonos products, we expect the headset to be on par with Bose, Sony, Sennheiser, Bowers & Wilkins, Bang & Olufsen and Apple’s flagship models, the latter may still be the most expensive headset. US$549.

As for the Sonos headset, this is the second time it has appeared in a patent application.They first appeared in documents filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in September 2020 and are now Similar documents with Germany In December.

Both documents include simple drawings of the headset, but some changes have been made between September and now. The latest design is simpler, with the headband attached to the top of each earmuff, instead of first arcing at the back of the earmuffs.

The new drawing also adds the Sonos name to the outside of the earmuffs for the first time. The sketch also includes what looks like a 3.5mm headphone jack and USB-C port, as well as buttons and switches that may be used to control volume and media playback.

The headset is the first headset from SonosSonos

Sonos has stated that the new products will arrive in March, and plans to launch two products each year. May product in March Is the so-called “Move Mini”, Is a smaller version of the company’s Move speaker. Move can be used as a normal smart speaker when placed on the base, but it has a battery, so it can be taken outdoors or used at home, and can also be used as a Bluetooth speaker.

Then, we hope to see the unnamed Sonos earphones arrive later in 2021. There are rumors that they will provide a seamless switching experience, and music played on the Sonos speaker system can be automatically switched to the headset, and vice versa.

We want these headphones to have their own Wi-Fi connection. This will help them differentiate themselves and turn them into a standalone device, where music can be streamed to them directly from a Wi-Fi router instead of from a smartphone or other device via Bluetooth. This may mean higher quality streaming, and Bluetooth will not suffer from any connectivity and range issues.

Of course, we hope that these headsets can also provide Bluetooth functionality like other headsets, and high-quality sound quality will be the main factor. We also hope to see that headphones can access Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant like some Sonos speakers and sound bars.

The price is still inconclusive, but we hope that the price of Sonos headphones will be around US$400 to US$450, which is comparable to most competitors, but the price can be easily reduced Apple AirPods Max.


image source