Tag Archives: pipe

The EU says it doesn’t need Nord Stream 2, but only Germany can block it | Instant News


BRUSSELS (Reuters) – The European Union does not need the Nord Stream 2 pipeline for its energy security but any decision to stop a project bringing Russian natural gas to Germany must come from Berlin, a senior European Commission official said on Tuesday.

FILE PHOTO: A worker is seen at the gas pipeline construction site Nord Stream 2, near the city of Kingisepp, Leningrad region, Russia, June 5, 2019. REUTERS / Anton Vaganov

The $ 11 billion pipeline project led by Russian state energy company Gazprom, whose completion is more than 90%, will double the capacity of an existing submarine pipeline passing through Ukraine and eliminate Kyiv’s transit costs.

The project pits Germany, the EU’s biggest economy, against central and eastern European countries that say it will increase the bloc’s dependence on Russian gas.

“For the EU as a whole, Nord Stream does not contribute to the security of supplies,” Ditte Juul Jorgensen, director general of the Commission’s energy department, told lawmakers on the European Parliament’s industry committee.

Investments over the past decade in other pipelines, liquefied natural gas import terminals and interconnectors in Europe have secured sufficient supplies to meet the bloc’s energy needs, he said.

Any decision to stop the project must be made by Germany, said Juul Jorgensen.

“Actually stopping development requires a decision at the national level. That is not a decision that can be taken at the European level, “he said.

Nord Stream 2 is facing increased scrutiny as European relations with Russia deteriorate over the treatment of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny.

The European Parliament last month asked the European Union to stop building a pipeline in response to Navalny’s arrest.

On Monday, EU foreign ministers agreed to impose sanctions on four senior Russian officials close to President Vladimir Putin, in large part symbolic action on the issue.

Despite US sanctions on the pipeline, Berlin is sticking to Nord Stream 2, which it says is a commercial project.

(This story adds the dropped “official” word)

Reporting by Kate Abnett; Edited by Sonya Hepinstall

.



image source

Future check: Australia’s gas grid looks environmentally friendly with hydrogen | Instant News


MELBOURNE (Reuters) – Australia’s natural gas pipeline owners are working to prove their future A $ 75 billion ($ 59 billion) asset amid a global push toward clean energy, running tests to mix hydrogen with gas and produce green methane to replace the material fossil fuel.

Cashing in rare bipartisan support for hydrogen across Australian national and state governments to help reduce carbon emissions, owners of pipelines and networks have committed A $ 180 million for a variety of projects involving green hydrogen.

The Australian state has pledged to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050, in line with many developed countries, but Canberra has not committed to a 2050 term.

“This is a business risk that we have to manage,” said Ben Wilson, chief executive of the Australian Gas Infrastructure Group (AGIG), which is owned by a unit of the Hong Kong-based CK Group.

“What was initially defensive has become an opportunity, especially given our renewable energy sources. We could become the world’s biggest exporter of green hydrogen, “he told Reuters.

Pipe owners seeking government funding for a hydrogen project aim to show how their infrastructure can be used to deliver hydrogen in mixtures with gas and store hydrogen as a form of renewable energy storage.

(Graph: Map of the Australian pipeline,)

“Ultimately, we also think that continuing to use this infrastructure allows the entire economy to remove carbon at a lower cost,” said Dennis Van Puyvelde, head of gas for Energy Networks Australia.

A study conducted for the industry body last year found that to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, building a hydrogen distribution network would cost half the cost of expanding the power grid to serve businesses and industries currently dependent on gas, and save Australia around A $ 13. billion.

The pipeline company is working on a shorter timeframe than 2050, as several states push to have 10% hydrogen in gas pipelines by 2030.

EYES WITH GREEN METHAN

A study conducted for the government found that hydrogen can be safely added to gas supplies up to 10% by volume without having to modify pipelines or equipment.

Van Puyvelde said the advantages of mixing hydrogen to gas allow for the gradual buildup of industrial hydrogen, requiring an electrolycer of up to 1 gigawatt, compared to the much larger and more expensive electrolyzers that would be required to export green hydrogen.

In the first testing of hydrogen into distribution networks in Australia, AGIG will begin injecting a volume-based 5% green hydrogen mixture in the gas next month, to 700 homes in Adelaide.

Jemena, a company owned by State Grid Corp of China and Singapore Power, is working on a similar government-backed project in Sydney, mixing up to 2% hydrogen into the country’s largest local gas network later this year.

More projects are in the works, with the pipeline company selected for A $ 70 million in hydrogen funding from the government, the Australian Renewable Energy Agency said.

Over the long term, the industry is closely watching Europe’s largest energy grid operator, E.ON, converts gas pipelines in Germany to produce pure hydrogen.

Apart from hydrogen, an ideal substitute for natural gas is green methane, if it can be produced commercially. Methane is chemically the same as natural gas, a fossil fuel.

Testing its potential, APA Group, Australia’s largest pipeline company, is building a pilot plant in the state of Queensland that will use solar energy to drive an electrolyzer to separate water, generate hydrogen and combine it with carbon dioxide extracted from the air to produce methane. .

The project has attracted the interest of US companies, and if successful, could help companies around the world, such as APA, which have billions of dollars invested in pipelines servicing liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants.

“If successful, it will be compatible with the existing LNG infrastructure. You don’t need to retrofit, “APA’s head of transformation, Hannah McCaughey, told Reuters. ($ 1 = 1,269 Australian dollars)

(This story has been rewritten to correct paragraph 3 to improve formatting)

Reporting by Sonali Paul; Edited by Ana Nicolaci da Costa

.



image source

Germany looks at the possibility of green hydrogen with Russia – minister | Instant News


FILE PHOTOS: German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier leaves a press conference on the annual economic report in Berlin, Germany January 27, 2021. Odd Andersen / Pool via REUTERS

FRANKFURT (Reuters) – Germany is in close communication with Russia about the potential for “green” hydrogen production and transportation, said Economy Minister Peter Altmaier at the Russia-Germany conference.

Altmaier said in a webcast that Russia could work with Germany on the production and transport of green hydrogen which Germany hopes can expand on a large scale by sending renewable power from wind and sunlight via electrolysis to make synthetic fuels for industry, energy and transportation. .

Russian Industry Minister Denis Manturov said in the same webcast that Russia is ready to prioritize investing in technology.

Reporting by Vera Eckert; editing by Thomas Seythal

.



image source

Germany offers US ‘dirty deal’ to lift Nord Stream 2 sanctions | News | DW | Instant News


The German government is offering the Trump administration financial support of up to € 1 billion ($ 1.21 billion) in a bid to prevent Washington from imposing sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, according to documents published by the non-profit organization Environmental Action Germany (DUH). Tuesday.

Controversial pipe, which is almost done, will double the amount of natural gas sent annually from Russia to Germany.

What did Germany supposedly offer?

The DUH published a personal letter from German Finance Minister Olaf Scholz to former US Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.

Scholz allegedly offered funds to import liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the US.

In return, the US was asked to allow “seamless construction and operation of Nord Stream 2.”

“The German government is willing to massively increase its public support for the construction of an LNG terminal along the German coastline … providing up to € 1 billion,” the letter said.

“Future legislation, which could serve as the basis for imposing sanctions on Nord Stream 2, will not be used or, in the case of mandatory sanctions provisions, blocked by adequate and effective waivers or other means.”

Scholz is a member of the Social Democrats (SPD), a junior partner in Germany’s coalition government. She is the party candidate for leader in this year’s national elections.

German Finance Minister and Deputy Chancellor Olaf Scholz offered a deal to the Trump Administration to fund the delivery of US liquefied gas to Germany to lift sanctions against Nord Stream 2.

What is the political reaction?

Sascha Mueller-Kraenner, executive director of DUH called it a “scandal” and “a dirty deal at the expense of a third party.”

A number of opposition politicians also condemned the revelations.

“It is completely unacceptable that Olaf Scholz is trying to use taxpayer money to use US fracked gas gold plates in Germany while at the same time wanting to buy Nord Stream 2 from US sanctions,” Greens MP Sven-Christian Kindler said in a statement. a statement.

The future Nord Stream 2 pipeline cut is located in the port of Rugen

The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline cut off the coast of the German island of Rugen

Leftist Party politician Sevim Dagdelen called the offer of taxpayers’ money for the construction of a subsidized LNG terminal “completely criminal”.

“You don’t make dirty secret deals with insolent blackmailers, even if they’re in the White House or in the US Senate,” said Dagdelen.

The Ministry of Finance in Berlin did not initially comment on the matter, although a spokesman said a statement was being prepared.

What’s the dispute about Nord Stream 2?

DUH and other climate activists oppose the expansion of the LNG infrastructure in Germany as well as the Nord Stream 2 project in large part because of a potential greenhouse gas emission problem.

US and some Eastern European countries fear the pipeline will increase West Europe’s energy dependence on Russia.

However, supporters of the gas pipeline have long accused the US of only selling domestic shipments fracked LNG to European customers.

The criticism of Nord Stream has also risen along with criticism of Russiatreatment of imprisoned Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny .

Nord Stream 2 pipeline route map in Europe showing other pipeline routes

The planned route of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline passes through Ukraine entirely, cutting the country off of the transit costs it gets from the existing gas pipeline.

In an interview Tuesday with a German newspaper Rheinische Post, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier defended the pipeline, saying that fuel sales were “one of the last bridges between Russia and Europe”.

He said this was all the more important because June would mark 80 years since Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union.

Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany said the remarks were met with “shock and anger” in Kyiv, because they ignored Nazi victims in Ukraine.

Ukraine’s refusal to Nord Stream 2 is also partly because Kyiv benefits from charging a transit fee for Russian gas sent via existing pipelines to Europe. The Nord Stream 2 Baltic Sea route will pass through Ukraine, delivering the gas directly from Russia to Germany.

mb / rt (DPA, Reuters)

.



image source

RPT-UPDATE 1-Germany supports Nord Stream 2 ‘for now’ – Merkel | Instant News


(Repeat to fix slugs, add pix to slugs)

BERLIN / PARIS, Feb. 5 (Reuters) – Germany remains supportive of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline “for the time being,” Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday after condemning the expulsion of Russian diplomats from Sweden, Germany and Poland.

Russia previously announced the expulsion, accusing diplomats of taking part in illegal protests last month against the imprisonment of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny.

Merkel condemned the expulsion as “unjustified” and Moscow’s next move away from the rule of law.

A German government official said the Foreign Ministry had summoned the Russian ambassador “for an urgent meeting and made Germany’s position very clear to him.”

After speaking with French President Emmanuel Macron, Merkel told reporters: “With regard to events in Russia, we have said that we have the right to continue with sanctions, especially against individuals.”

“The position on Nord Stream 2 is not affected by this at the moment; this is a project where you find out where the federal government is, “Merkel said.

It is a “diplomatic duty” to keep the channels of communication open with Europe’s giant eastern neighbors, he added.

The German position is that Nord Stream 2 is a commercial project. However, Merkel expanded her description of the pipe, which she said she discussed openly with Macron.

“On the one hand, this is a commercial project, on the other hand, it has political implications and plays a big role in the transatlantic region,” said Merkel.

Washington has long argued that the pipeline would increase Russia’s influence over Europe. The new US President Joe Biden believes it is a “bad deal for Europe”.

Navalny’s poisoning and imprisonment have pushed Nord Stream 2 to the top of Germany’s political agenda, creating serious problems for Merkel’s successor following the country’s September elections.

The pioneer to replace Merkel, the new leader of Christian Democrats Armin Laschet, firmly supports Nord Stream 2 but her future government partner, ecologist Greens, is against it.

Macron said he “very harshly” condemned Moscow’s behavior towards Navalny from his poisoning to his arrest and expulsion of foreign diplomats.

On Nord Stream 2, he said: “We have set a European course and I will stick with it. Nothing can be done without close Franco-German cooperation. We want to implement a more sovereign energy transition and a more demanding discussion with Russia ”.

The $ 11 billion pipeline, 90% complete, will double the capacity of the existing Nord Stream line to deliver gas from Russia to Europe via Germany under the Baltic Sea.

Reporting by Thomas Escritt and Paul Carrel in Berlin, and by Dominique Vidalon in Paris. Edited by Jane Merriman

.



image source