Tag Archives: political

UK PM Boris Johnson urged Britons to follow rules to avoid lockdowns | Instant News

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson leaves 10 Downing Street for PMQ at the House of Commons on September 30, 2020 in London, England.

Alberto Pezzali | NurPhoto via Getty Images

LONDON – British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Wednesday called on Britons to abide by rules to avoid stricter coronavirus restrictions, as the country grapples with a rapid spike in the number of reported coronavirus cases.

“The best way forward to protect the NHS, save lives, to keep our children in school and the economy moving is to follow the rules wherever we live,” Johnson said.

“I don’t want to go back to a national lockdown where the overall guidelines are staying at home,” Johnson said, responding to a question sent from a member of the public. “That’s not what we’re saying, we want the economy to keep moving, we want young people, students to stay in education. But, the only way we can do that is if we all follow the guidelines and suppress the virus.”

The prime minister, who recently had to apologize after screwing up the government’s own coronavirus rules, spoke alongside Chris Whitty, the government’s chief medical officer, and Patrick Vallance, its chief scientific adviser, during a televised press conference.

It came shortly after the country recorded the highest number of Covid-19 infections reported since the pandemic began.

Britain reported an additional 7,143 coronavirus cases on Tuesday, more than the number of new cases reported in late April and early May when strict national lockdown measures were put in place, although now more Covid-19 tests are carried out daily than in spring.

The UK also recorded a further 71 coronavirus-related deaths on Tuesday. It is the highest number of deaths from Covid-19 reported in the UK since July 1. It has the worst official death toll in Europe, and the fifth highest number of deaths from the coronavirus worldwide.

On Wednesday, Britain recorded 7,108 new coronavirus cases and an additional 71 related deaths, the same number of deaths reported on Tuesday.

‘Discipline and determination’

Downing Street previously announced that mixing of households in northeast England would be banned from late Wednesday, following a sharp increase in the number of confirmed cases in the region.

The government also advised residents in the region to avoid hanging out with people outside their homes in pubs and restaurants.

Johnson, who fell ill when he contracted Covid-19 earlier this year, has called on the public to “call on the discipline and determination” needed to keep up with the latest adoption of coronavirus rules.

In a television broadcast to the country on Sept. 23, the prime minister outlined new restrictions that could be imposed for up to six months, saying “too many violations have occurred.”

In the UK, these include stricter restrictions on face covering, and the number of people allowed to attend weddings has been halved. Pubs, restaurants and other hospitality establishments were also told to close at 10 p.m., while fines for breaking the new rules were raised to £ 200 ($ 256) in the first offense.

Hospitality establishments also had to close early in Wales and Scotland, while Northern Ireland has banned households from mingling indoors.

Tens of millions of people in Britain are now subject to local restrictions brought in to try to slow the spread of the coronavirus outbreak.

However, as pressure mounts on Johnson to impose a so-called two-week “circuit breaker” lockdown to contain the virus, leading lawmakers in the ruling Conservative Party have spoken out against potential additional action.

Johnson suggested the government “should have the right to go further” with stricter regulations if the number of Covid-19 cases and related deaths continues to rise.


image source

Franklin’s one of the first stops for the NH Food Bank drive-thru soup kitchen Announcement | Instant News

MANCHESTER – As food insecurity increases, New Hampshire Food Bank, a Catholic Charities New Hampshire program, is running a series of drive-thru soup kitchens to handle one in seven residents who don’t know where their next meal will come from. from. Starting with mobile food kitchens in Colebrook, the food bank will run three mobile food kitchens each week for five weeks at locations throughout the state.

Since March, the New Hampshire Food Bank has run 22 soup kitchens weekly to meet growing demand. During this drive-thru event, the food bank brings in many food trucks for distribution while supplies last.

“Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we estimate an additional 71,000 people in New Hampshire are food insecure – which marks a more than 55 percent increase in the number of people who are food insecure,” said Eileen Liponis, executive director. “Community situations can change quickly and we and our more than 400 partner agencies are working tirelessly to do everything we can to be a resource to those in need. This series of mobile food pantries is a way for us to reach more individuals and families directly. “

In the Greater Lake Territory, the New Hampshire Food Bank schedules a mobile food pantry in Franklin for Friday, October 2, 1-3 p.m., at the US Army National Guard Armory, 300 S. Main St.

Another stop is scheduled for Lincoln on Thursday, October 1, and the organization will continue to confirm additional locations.

The New Hampshire Food Bank asks those who can afford to make a cash donation, allowing the food bank to purchase food for distribution across the state. The New Hampshire Food Bank receives funding one time through the federal CARES Act. The New Hampshire Food Bank can convert every dollar donated into two nutritious meals.


image source

Pasifika People and New Zealand Elections | Instant News

As New Zealand prepares to go to the polls in September, debate is often over how the government will distribute resources, what it prioritizes in this world of COVID-19, the housing crisis and the ongoing climate crisis. I am a native of Fiji, living and working in New Zealand, so my experience of New Zealand politics is colored.

Obviously, there are many differences between the New Zealand government and the Fiji government. Fiji is a republic, New Zealand has an MMP system, Fiji is basically one big voter, and there are many more to mention. However, there are parallels. Both governments invested heavily in maintaining influence in the region, both countries had failed to push for a change to the Union Jack on our flag in the early 2010s, and both governments are institutions built on the foundation to control the homeland for Britain. colonial administration.

My understanding of politics is colored by who I am as a native Fijian, and this is very much in tune with land politics. How land is understood is similar in both Itaukei (native Fijian) and Māori culture, and this is evidenced in the words used in both languages ​​- vanua in vosa vaka Viti and
soil at te reo Māori. Because iTaukei land is not just a physical entity – it is where all aspects of life and society are organized.

It informs education, relationships, status, anxiety, and power. Fear of land alienation was the reason given for Fiji’s first coup. May 14, 1987 saw Dr Timoci Bavadra removed as Prime Minister of Fiji. The coup was led by Lieutenant Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka (currently Leader of the Fiji Opposition). Two (or three, or three and a half, depending on your count) more coups have followed, all related to this same anxiety.

Land alienation is something indigenous peoples around the world have to deal with, and this is true when it comes to New Zealand. Fiji, some consider, to be an anomaly. iTaukei, in this case, owns about 90% of the land. This is compounded by the fact that, apart from tourism, Fiji’s economy is supported by land-intensive industries such as agriculture, timber and sugar. This could indicate that there is a legacy of British colonial administration, and their “virtues”.

This virtue is a myth. iTaukei Fiji owns the land, but does not control it. They owned land as part of a landowning unit called mataqali – a colonial administrative creation. This control is carried out in an institution called the iTaukei Land Trustee Agency (TLTB). The TLTB is the current iteration of the administrative process that determines what is done to iTaukei lands, and has been doing it, on behalf of the colonial government, and in turn, the state of Fiji, since the turn of the 20th century.

The colonial project in Viti, in Aotearoa, and in the Pacific was – and is now – a series of power games seeking to gain position and influence for colonial powers. He is only interested in his own protection and in his own authority. Our land is no longer an extension of who we are, but a means of production – a means of acquiring wealth to sustain colonialism and capitalism. Our land is also used for profit, for sowing distrust, depriving us of voting rights, and destroying the collective.

Land is not immediately at the forefront of the questions voters should be asking during New Zealand’s election campaign. The economy, the COVID-19 recovery, the housing crisis, the climate crisis: these are the stockpile centers dotting the fences of busy streets. Peel these questions back, and you can see that voters are basically asking what do we prioritize?

The New Zealand Labor Party will enter this election on a wave of political capital, and voting rates are generally high. Its leader, Jacinda Ardern, is the face of a globally recognized brand of “goodness” politics. His opposition, the New Zealand National Party, has been marred by recent infighting, scandals, low voting numbers and the controversial leader in Judith Collins. Some of the strongest Labor Party seats in the last election were the Pasifika camp: there is strong affiliation between the Pasifika community and the Labor Party.

The official launch of the Labor campaign at Auckland City Hall saw one policy announcement from the Labor Party – a National Party policy regurgitation from 2012, albeit with more funding (this funding will come from unused wage subsidies). What does this mean for Fiji and Pasifika voters in New Zealand? Loyalty to the party, flush with political capital, which has given us only one piece of centric policy with more than one month for elections.

The trauma of the colonial project in the Pacific was not only actively ignored, it was added. From the military-industrial complex demanding a war game in the midst of a pandemic in Hawai’i, to Judith Collins who rejects any purpose whenua to protect Ihumātao as “nonsense”, to the stern silence of the New Zealand government in the face of ongoing persecution in West Papua by the Indonesian government , and the current refusal to support the Committee for the Decolonization of West Papua at the United Nations – this trauma is painful, complex, and has an ever-changing face.

Maybe the question
what this (election) means for Fijian, and Pasifical, voters in New Zealand not necessarily a fair or good question. The Pacific Community in New Zealand doesn’t just invest in New Zealand’s election results. We are too diverse and invested to have a satisfying monolithic answer. Perhaps I am asking too much about a system that sees whenua as just another means of strengthening capitalism, another means of furthering colonialism. And because he can’t see whenua for what he is, he can’t see us as who we are – because vanua are inherently part of our being. Our survival as a culture is based on the protection of whenua, fonua, vanua. It is not a matter of “proper” elections, nor is it a specific issue for the Labor Party, and it is likely that the Pasifika people will remain loyal to the Labor Party through the upcoming elections. Yet in Queen Joni Madraiwiwi’s eternal words “withdrawal or non-participation is an option open to idealists and cynics … we owe it to … ourselves to face the consequences as they are, not as we wish.”

Auhored by Salote Cama. From the upcoming issue of Fightback on Election Politics. To subscribe, please visit https://fightback.zoob.net/payment.html

© Scoop Media


image source

Lesotho: Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Results in Lesotho, Kenya and Armenia | Instant News

The Human Rights Council at its midday meeting adopted the results of the Universal Periodic Review from Lesotho, Kenya and Armenia.

Refiloe Litjobo, Lesotho’s Permanent Representative at the United Nations Office in Geneva, said the recommendation allowed Lesotho to take a critical look at the promotion and protection of human rights in the country. He praised the impartiality that characterized this review. He emphasized that several recommendations have been implemented, particularly those aimed at combating human trafficking, particularly women and girls.

The Vice President of the Council informed that of the 211 recommendations received, 168 had support from Lesotho and 43 others were recorded.

The Board then adopted the results of Lesotho’s Universal Periodic Review.

Speakers in Lesotho’s Universal Periodic Review were Gabon, India, Libya, Malawi, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Namibia, Nepal, Nigeria, Philippines, Senegal, Sierra Leone and South Africa.

Also attending were the following non-governmental organizations: International Volunteer Organization for Women, Global Nonkilling Center, Canadian Action for Population and Development, and Rencontre africaine pour la défense des droits de l’homme.

Cleopa K. Mailu, Permanent Representative of Kenya to the United Nations Office in Geneva, acknowledged the importance of access to justice, saying that the Kenyan Government had established four additional high courts in the district and introduced a digital case management system to eliminate old trials. problems in the justice system, including missing files, delays, lack of accountability and lack of transparency.

The Vice President of the Council informed that of the 319 recommendations received, 263 received support from Kenya and 56 were listed.

The speakers in the Universal Periodic Review of Kenya are Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Uganda, UN Women, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Afghanistan and Algeria.

Also present were the following national human rights institutions and non-governmental organizations: the National Human Rights Commission of Kenya, Edmund Rice International Limited, Istituto Internazionale Maria Ausiliatrice delle Salesiane at Don Bosco, East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project, Center for Global Without -killing, Article 19 – International Center Against Censorship, Rencontre africaine pour la défense des droits de l’homme, International Humanist and Ethical Union, Federation of Women and Family Planning, CIVICUS – World Alliance for Citizen Participation, and the Freedom Defense Alliance.

The Human Rights Council subsequently adopted the results of the Universal Periodic Review in Kenya.

Andranik Hovhannisyan, the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations Office in Geneva, said that because hostilities in the region continued, the Government could not actively participate in the review today. Armenia believes that Universal Periodic Reviews should not be misused to score political points. Its aims and principles, especially to avoid confrontation and non-politicization, must be upheld.

The Vice President of the Council informed that of the 252 recommendations received, 239 received support from Armenia and another 13 were recorded.

The speakers in the Universal Periodic Review Armenia are Egypt, Ethiopia, Greece, India, Iran, Kyrgyzstan, Namibia, Nepal, Philippines, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Sri Lanka and Syria.

Also present were the following national human rights institutions and non-governmental organizations: Armenian Office of Human Rights Defenders, International Catholic Children’s Bureau, Canadian Action for Population and Development, Foundation for Human Rights Homes, CIVICUS – World Alliance for Citizen Participation, International Reconciliation Alliance, International Peace Tax and Conscience, and the Global Nonkilling Center.