Tag Archives: Port

NASR civil servants arrive at the Port of Karachi – Pakistan | Instant News


Published in April 14, 2021 16:34

NASR civil servants arrive at Karachi Port

KARACHI (Dunya News) – Pakistan Navy ship NASR arrived at Karachi Port after completing successful three months of Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief missions to African countries.

During the deployment to the African continent, NASR civil servants sent 1000 tons of rice as gifts from the Pakistani community in Djibouti, Sudan, Benin and Niger.

The ship also made a good faith visit to Mombasa, Kenya. The HADR mission is planned after Niger is hit by flash floods and drought in 2020, causing widespread damage.

During the port call, the Ship was warmly welcomed by the higher host naval authorities. As a sign of goodwill and humanitarian support, food aid was handed over to the local authorities of Djibouti, Sudan, Benin and Niger.

Host country officials pay special tribute to the Government of Pakistan and the Pakistan Navy for this kind gesture and humanitarian assistance.

In addition, during the interactions, the mutual warmth and desire to further strengthen the bonds of friendship between Pakistan and the visiting countries were also highlighted.

On arrival at Karachi Port, NASR PNS were received by the Commander of the Pakistan Fleet and other high ranking officials of the Pakistan Navy in addition to representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The PN band was also present at the occasion and played Pakistani songs and the national anthem.

The mission is planned in line with the Government of Pakistan’s ‘Engage Africa’ policy to open new views of bilateral cooperation with African countries and further strengthen ties of friendship.

.



image source

The Pantheon of Greek Shipping announces its Acceptance Ceremony for 2021 | Instant News


The Pantheon of Greek Shipping announced that they intend to host this year’s annual Reception Ceremony on the evening of Wednesday, July 7, 2021, as a live dinner event under the stars.

The Pantheon of Greek Shipping’s 2021 Introduction & Dinner Ceremony will celebrate Greece’s voyage and will pay tribute to historical figures who have contributed to its formation.
If public health regulations allowed it at the time, this would be the first time a long-awaited outdoor delivery event has taken place in the summer.
An exciting program will include the recent opening of Admissions to the Pantheon of Greek Shipping. The 2020 admissions will be combined with the 32 “big ones” that have already been admitted to the Pantheon.
The Pantheon of Greek Shipping will continue to support Hellenic Hope and a portion of the proceeds from this year’s event will go to this children’s charity, which focuses on providing assistance to children in need in Greece.

We are proud to support our famous sponsors to date:
ABS, IRI – The Marshall Islands Registry and Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co. as Co-Lead Sponsors of the Introduction Ceremony and Dinner 2021.

Christopher J. Wiernicki, ABS Chair, President and CEO commented:
“ABS is proud to honor these Greek shipping visionaries and to celebrate their continued insights and business genius. These leaders continue to shape shipping while creating a truly global legacy.” The Pantheon provides a valuable opportunity to reflect on the immense contribution Greek shipping has made to world trade and ABS welcomes it. all comers. “
Theophilos Xenakoudis, Director – Worldwide Business Operations & Managing Director Greece, International Registries Inc. comment:
“The Marshall Islands Registry celebrates the leaders of the Greek shipping community, who for centuries have led the shipping industry to innovate and transform. As we look forward to a decade of advanced technology and environmentally friendly solutions, we salute the recipients of the new Pantheon of Greek Shipping award- recently. ”
Wang Qi, Chairman of Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding, comments:

“SWS is delighted to once again support the Pantheon of Greek Shipping and pay tribute to its professed shipping legend. We enjoy a very close relationship with Greek shipping and the prestigious Pantheon of Greek Shipping event every year gives us the perfect opportunity to express our interest in history and Greek shipping culture and meeting some of our most important friends and customers. “
Introduction & The 2021 Dinner Ceremony will begin with a welcoming reception from the TMS.
Pantheon of Greek Shipping would like to thank the Navios Group for their generous support as a Dinner Sponsor.
So far, the confirmed Premium sponsors of the event are: Baltic Exchange, Bureau Veritas, Citi Private Bank and Moore Greece.
Sponsors so far include: China Classification Society, ClassNK, The Ecali Club, Isle of Man Ship Registry, Kyvernitis Travel Group, Lloyd’s Register and Marichem Marigases Worldwide Services.

.



image source

First ocean liner arrives at port | Local News | Instant News


The MV Federal Cedar, a vessel registered in the Marshall Islands, entered Thunder Bay Harbor on Sunday morning, making it the first seaborne ocean liner to arrive for the 2021 navigation season.

Docked at the Richardson International Main Lift, the ship is loading 12,000 metric tons of Canadian west red spring wheat for export to Puerto Rico.

See the full story in the print and digital editions of The Chronicle-Journal.

.



image source

Exclusive: Germany will propose reconstruction of Beirut port on ‘terms attached’ – source | Instant News


PARIS / BERLIN (Reuters) – Germany will next week submit a multi-billion dollar proposal to Lebanese authorities to rebuild the Port of Beirut as part of efforts to persuade the country’s politicians to form a government capable of averting a financial collapse, two sources. the word.

FILE PHOTO: A scene showing the location of the August 4 explosion in the port of Beirut, Lebanon February 18, 2021. REUTERS / Mohamed Azakir / File Photo

A chemical explosion at the port last August killed 200 people, injured thousands and destroyed entire neighborhoods in the Lebanese capital, plunging the country deeper into the worst political and economic crisis since the 1975-1990 civil war.

According to two diplomatic sources familiar with the plan, Germany and France are competing to lead the reconstruction effort. Berlin will on April 7 outline a proposal that the European Investment Bank has agreed to help fund that will clean up the area and rebuild facilities, they said.

One source estimates EIB funding to be in the range of 2 billion to 3 billion euros.

A senior Lebanese official confirmed that Germany will present a comprehensive port reconstruction proposal.

Both the German foreign ministry and consulting firm Roland Berger, which diplomatic sources said drew up the plan, immediately responded to requests for comment. EIB could not be reached for comment.

The two diplomatic sources said that Lebanon’s political elite first needs to agree on a new government arrangement to improve public finances and root out corruption, a condition that donors, including the International Monetary Fund, are also demanding before they open up billions. dollars in aid.

“This plan will not come selflessly,” said one source. “Germany and France want to see governments in a place that are committed to implementing reforms. There is no other way and this is good for Lebanon. “

Eight months after the port disaster, many Lebanese who have lost their families, homes and businesses are still awaiting the results of investigations into the cause of the explosion. Lebanon is on the brink of collapse, with buyers fighting over goods, protesters blocking roads and businesses closing.

Foreign donors say the new government must have a strong mandate to carry out economic reforms, including central bank audits and overhauling the wasteful power sector.

However, the Prime Minister appointed by Saad al-Hariri and President Michel Aoun could not agree on the composition of the ministers. The outgoing cabinet, which stopped after the explosion, remained in the capacity of the caretaker.

The IMF said there had been no program discussions with Lebanese officials, only technical assistance with the Ministry of Finance and several state-owned companies.

GERMAN PROPOSAL

As well as the port itself, German proposals would rebuild more than 100 hectares in the surrounding area in a project that two diplomatic sources said would align with post-war reconstruction in central Beirut.

As for the rebuilding, the plan will involve the formation of a public company similar to Solidere, which was founded by former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in the 1990s and remains on the Lebanese stock exchange.

Sources put the project cost at between $ 5 billion and $ 15 billion, and said it could create as many as 50,000 jobs.

The Lebanese official said French and French ports and container delivery group CMA CGM were also interested in the reconstruction project.

One diplomatic source noted that France had sent several missions, including one in March which included the CMA CGM, which showed interest in playing a role in reconstruction. The mission focuses on special cleanup operations rather than broader rebuilding, the source said.

The French foreign ministry declined to comment immediately. CMA CGM declined to comment.

Lebanese officials assign responsibility for running the project to Europeans who agree on who will take the lead.

“This is a European decision in the end, because they have to decide for themselves. Then when it comes to that matter, the Lebanese government can continue, “the official said.

Diplomatic sources said Germany wanted to cooperate with France on this issue, but Paris was pursuing its own initiative for now.

“The irony of all this is that on the one hand the Europeans are talking about putting pressure on the political class while on the other hand fighting each other over this potential contract while the vultures are still circling,” said one.

Reporting by John Irish in Paris, Joseph Nasr in Berlin, Ellen Francis in Beirut; Supplementary Reports by Maha El Dahan in Beirut and Gus Trompiz in Paris; Edited by Sonya Hepinstall

.



image source

INTERVIEW: Shooting for the moon – Bunkerspot | Instant News


Last month, Denmark put its name on a proposal labeled the ‘shot of the moon’ to set up a $ 5 billion fund to catalyze the research and development (R&D) it needs to help shipments meet the UN’s decarbonization goals. Thinking blue sky or cake in the sky? Bunker place spoke with the Danish Head of Maritime Security, Environment and Maritime Research, Maria Skipper Schwenn, to find out more.


Why did Danish Shipping decide to support a $ 5 billion R&D fund proposal?

Maria Skipper Schwenn: We have been heavily involved in the preparation of proposals through our membership in the International Chamber of Shipping. What’s changed [last month] It is a fact that Denmark, as a country and as a member state of the International Maritime Organization, supports the proposal.

It’s quite unique that you have an industry at the international level that proposes this. This is the first time you have really seen proposals from the joint industry on financing the transition facing the industry. At IMO, it is the Member States that ultimately adopt the regulations. Therefore, we need the support of Member States so that the IMRB proposal can be turned into a regulation.

How can Denmark support the proposal?

MSS: In the fall of 2019, the Danish government established 13 climate partnerships between government and industry. Its job is to bring initiatives to the table that industry itself can undertake under the current framework to contribute to Denmark’s national emission reduction target of 70% by 2030.As an industry, we must make initiatives and recommendations for the government to take over and do more work. continue. One of the initiatives we brought to the table was a proposal by the International Maritime Research and Development Agency (IMRB) – that the industry itself takes responsibility and raises revenue for research and development. But we also clearly state in our report that we need to have government support for this because otherwise it wouldn’t be the rule at IMO. So, we are very happy that Denmark has decided to take a recommendation from the industry and act on it.

How did you get to the $ 5 billion mark?

MSS: That’s a very good question. We need someone to talk about it. $ 5 billion is just a proposal to be negotiated. Nothing says that’s where we’ll end up, but in order to be able to describe the size of the animal we’re talking about, we have to add an image. Is that going to be $ 2 per tonne [of fuel], I don’t know, it’s for negotiation. If you ask, it’s definitely not fixed, it’s something to negotiate with.

What are some considerations in deciding to set a $ 2 per tonne amount of fuel?

MSS: It’s important to understand that this is not an MBM [market-based measure]. This is not a mechanism that will push [emissions] subtraction. Now we’re saying $ 2. That won’t drive any deductions. There is absolutely no incentive to reduce your emissions at the cost of just $ 2 per tonne of fuel – and that’s not the point of this. The goal is to generate revenue which can then be channeled into research and development, fuel type testing, energy infrastructure – everything we need to be involved in the transition.

What would you say to those countries, such as the Marshall Islands and the Solomon Islands, that think the proposals are not enough?

MSS: The Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands have submitted proposals for a $ 100 fee, but it is an entirely different matter. It was a massive MBM. For us at Danish Shipping, we believe it is too early to start talking about numbers and numbers before we really agree on what the goal is because otherwise you will end up in a discussion about $ 100, $ 150, $ 250 and you won’t. go anywhere. You will then have all developing countries ask for support and then raise a joint but different responsibility card [the principle that recognises all states are responsible for addressing climate change but do not share equal responsibility]. From our point of view, the IMRB proposal is not an MBM, it is something completely different, and we support the beginning to discuss MBM in its entirety. Again, not $ 100 or $ 150, but the principles of the MBM, and how we designed that MBM, so it really drives reduction, and it rewards and incentivizes first movers. That is what we want to focus more on at the moment and which we are ready to discuss because, yes, one day there will be MBM.

The strength of the IMRB proposal is that it can be carried out as an amendment to MARPOL, so that it is an amendment to existing regulations, which means that it can actually take place and be ready in 2023. Meanwhile, the MBM as a whole will require a new regulatory framework and knowing IMO which can take up to eight year, [then] IMRB is the first step towards making this happen.

Shipping companies have come under increasing financial pressure in recent years to comply with stricter emission regulations. Do you think that the potential 2% tax on their fuel bill makes sense, especially when the market is already responding to the challenge of decarbonization?

MSS: I can of course only speak for my members and there I clearly feel the urgency as they are being met by requests from customers starting with transparency regarding their emissions. But then there are the requirements for low-carbon shipping, and with those terms and demands, companies can start talking about who will pay the bills. So, that’s the customer side. And then you have the whole investor side where you also have increasing requirements for transparency and low-carbon green vessels if you want to get invested. So, I think we are seeing the circle starting to develop and thus also sharing responsibility for the bill.

Our members are eager to run this because they don’t want to be the last industry someone else will decide for them, just because shipping will stand there by itself when the rest of the world is gone. It’s no secret, there are also parts of the industry that are dragging their feet, but in that sense, I have an easy job because I have a very homogeneous membership where they agree we have to be proactive, and we should set the agenda as an industry instead of asking other people do it for us.

Do you expect resistance to this proposal?

MSS: Since this is a joint industry proposal, you even have the most conservative national associations backing the IMRB proposal. We’ve been working on this proposal for some time and there is definitely some movement in the industry and for sure, as we said in Denmark, some hairy camels to swallow! It’s important to highlight that there will be no doubt or lack of support from the industry. The industry is 100% behind the IMRB proposal and will furthermore be ready to start discussions on massive MBM.

When is the time for submitting a proposal?

MSS: Now will be discussed at the MEPC [Marine Environment Protection Committee] in June and will hopefully be greeted with a view to further discussion in the fall. That’s how it works at IMO – they open a discussion and then point out things to refer to at the next committee meeting. Then hopefully it will be discussed further at the next MEPC in November and then approved at the MEPC in 2022.

Does the proposal require unanimous approval from all member states?

MSS: In principle, that’s how IMO works, but you never see voting taking place on IMO. If that happens, it will be one-country-one-vote, assuming they are parties to the MARPOL Convention. Usually what happens is that you have all the statements and then the Chairman concludes and he can quickly figure out how many [Member States] support and do not support the proposal. I have experienced several countries threatening to demand a vote. When [0.50%] the sulfur regulations go into effect, we suddenly see some really attractive countries suddenly ratify the MARPOL Convention so they have a say, and I’m pretty sure there has been some lobbying going on! But in principle, it will be a consensus, but not unanimous.

Do you expect the proposal to be approved and then adopted at the end of the year?

I really think that now with co-sponsorship – because this is a pretty influential state – that is supporting it to keep this going. But I am sure there will be developing countries who will question this. [For instance], a small island nation that depends on the transport of its goods by sea wants to know if goods are becoming more expensive.

There are still some things to discuss, but I don’t understand why it won’t be adopted next year. Who can refuse to raise money for this? It’s counter-intuitive to say you’re against this. For those who say that this is too unambitious? This is not an MBM, let’s work on an MBM that will drive emission reductions and have an economic impact – let’s work on it in parallel with the IMRB. That’s why I’m sure it will be adopted and it will become law.

.



image source