PM Imran urges the international community to raise awareness about Indian atrocities in occupied Kashmir | Pakistan

.

image source

The world must raise awareness about the crimes against humanity in India, Prime Minister Imran tells parliamentarians of the United Kingdom | Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: The world must raise awareness about the crimes against humanity of India, Prime Minister Imran Khan told the multi-party delegation of members of the Parliament of the United Kingdom during a meeting here in the federal capital.

The delegation of parliamentarians from the United Kingdom was led by Debbie Abrahams, president of the Kashmir Parliamentary Group of All Parties (APPKG).

It was the responsibility of the international community to pressure India to implement the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on occupied Kashmir, the prime minister added.

Pakistan believes that a just and lasting solution to the Kashmir dispute is essential for peace, security and stability in South Asia, he said, reiterating Islamabad’s commitment to continue supporting the Kashmir people in their fight for justice. and the inalienable right of self-determination.

The Prime Minister commended APPKG’s constant focus on the issue and noted the important contribution made by his previous reports on the human rights situation in occupied Kashmir. He also informed the delegation of the serious conditions of human and humanitarian rights in the Muslim majority region following the illegal and unilateral actions of India on August 5, 2019.

Prime Minister Imran also stressed that some eight million cashmere were under military siege during the past six months, and all their rights and freedoms were taken away. The threat to peace and security posed by belligerent rhetoric and aggressive actions by the administration of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the ground, he stressed.

He further stressed that the Hindu ideology of the ruling government of the Bharatiya Janata Party, inspired by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), was squeezing the Kashmiris in the occupied region on the one hand and restricting the space for minorities in India on the other.

The prime minister also stressed that India could resort to a “false flag” operation to divert international attention from its unacceptable actions in the Himalayan region.

The delegation was made up of Deputies Debbie Abrahams, Imran Hussain, Sarah Britcliffe, James Daly, Tahir Ali, Judith Cummins, Mark Eastwood, Lord Qurban Hussain and Yasmine Dar, member of the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the Labor Party.

.

image source

Trump will raise money for big ticket fundraising tonight in the home of billionaire Palm Beach tonight

About 40 attendees are expected to join the President at the exclusive event after distributing more than half a million dollars per couple, said a Republican who is familiar with the event. The Washington Post reported it for the first time on fundraising.

The event is expected to raise over $ 10 million for Trump Victory, the joint fundraising committee for Trump’s reelection campaign, the Republican National Committee and 11 state Republican parties, after each pair donated the entry price of $ 580,600.

Bloomberg is spending his billions. Trump hosts expensive fundraising for 2020. But is it legal?

Dinner isn’t the first exclusive one-dollar fundraising event that Trump pointed out as he marches into the November 2020 election, but it’s the most expensive so far, said a Republican aware of the event.

Peltz is an investor and non-executive chairman of the Wendy’s Company who previously donated to pro-Trump and republican causes.

Fundraising comes after the Trump campaign and RNC released an impressive $ 60 million fundraising month in January, a soaring Trump campaign and RNC officials attributed to Trump’s impeachment.

.

image source

Trump will raise money for big ticket fundraising tonight in the home of billionaire Palm Beach tonight

About 40 attendees are expected to join the President at the exclusive event after distributing more than half a million dollars per couple, said a Republican who is familiar with the event. The Washington Post reported it for the first time on fundraising.

The event is expected to raise over $ 10 million for Trump Victory, the joint fundraising committee for Trump’s reelection campaign, the Republican National Committee and 11 state Republican parties, after each pair donated the entry price of $ 580,600.

Bloomberg is spending his billions. Trump hosts expensive fundraising for 2020. But is it legal?

Dinner isn’t the first exclusive one-dollar fundraising event that Trump pointed out as he marches into the November 2020 election, but it’s the most expensive so far, said a Republican aware of the event.

Peltz is an investor and non-executive chairman of the Wendy’s Company who previously donated to pro-Trump and republican causes.

Fundraising comes after the Trump campaign and RNC released an impressive $ 60 million fundraising month in January, a soaring Trump campaign and RNC officials attributed to Trump’s impeachment.

.

image source

Security experts raise concerns about the voting app used by military voters

The app is designed by the Voatz company, whose technology has so far been tested in West Virginia, Colorado and Utah.

“We want to be clear that all nine government pilot elections conducted so far, involving fewer than 600 voters, have been conducted safely and without reported problems,” Voatz said in the statement. “The real goal of the researchers is to deliberately end the electoral process, sow doubts about the security of our electoral infrastructure and spread fear and confusion.”

The report emerges amid growing concerns about the use of online voting apps and tools in the 2020 election following the failure of reporting tools in Iowa caucuses.

Last year, Utah County, Utah, started using Voatz for disabled and military voters based abroad. In an interview, county secretary Amelia Powers Gardner said that Voatz made more sense than the previous system, which required remote voters to send their ballots via email.

A review of Voatz’s implementation in Utah County – before the MIT report was released – revealed no problems, Gardner told CNN. Gardner said that in telephone conversations with MIT researchers, it became clear that they preferred to vote traditionally, with pen and paper. But Gardner said it is not feasible for Utahns living abroad.

“I have a legal obligation to provide our military members abroad with an electronic form of ballot,” he said, “and if that’s not it, it’s the email – which they agreed isn’t so secure.”

The researchers’ conclusions about the security risks in the app were based on a retro-engineered version of Voatz’s Android app, which ran in a simulated environment. According to the study, a hacker who gains control of a smartphone with the app installed could interfere in the voting process by altering the ballots or finding out which candidate supports a voter.

“Which means they could stop the vote if they knew you would vote for someone they didn’t like,” Mike Specter, one of the report’s authors, told CNN.

Other electoral security experts who have reviewed the MIT document say it looks solid.

“This MIT study appears to have been carefully structured in the way the analysis was conducted,” said Andrea Matwyshyn, an electoral security expert at Penn State University.

Up a conference call with reporters on Thursdayhowever, Voatz criticized the report’s methodology. The company’s executives said the researchers had used an outdated version of the software and that some of the problems found had already been fixed. Voatz also accused the researchers of making “hypothetical” claims based on their simulation, rather than letting the app interact with a real Voatz server.

“We already have this server available,” said Nimit Sawhney, CEO of Voatz. “It’s for our public bug reward program. Anyone who wants to sign up, test the apps over there, against the full-featured real server, can.”

The company declined to comment further.

While participating in the bug bounty program would allow researchers to verify how the Voatz app interacts with the company’s servers, the law largely prohibits researchers from testing the servers themselves, said Eric Mill, a cybersecurity expert who administered technology programs for the federal government.

“The fact that the app is talking to the server is not the same as giving permission to search for the real server,” said Mill.

Critics say Voatz should be more transparent about its technology and what it has used to perform independent audits. Voatz also say earlier reported a researcher from the University of Michigan to the FBI for conducting similar tests on the technology, and the report’s authors cited that episode as the reason why they didn’t contact the company directly.

Instead, they reported their findings to the National Security Department, which routinely acts as a clearinghouse for electoral integrity information.

Voatz said Thursday that MIT researchers should contact them, despite their concerns about handling Voatz’s previous research efforts. He also claimed to have signed non-disclosure agreements that prevent the company from discussing many of its previous audits, although he acknowledged that DHS had carried out its own audit.

The The Coindesk technology news site said it got a copy of the DHS review and reported it on Friday, adding that while U.S. officials encountered few major problems with Voatz, the review focused primarily on the company’s internal network and servers, not on the app that was the subject of the MIT report.

The tension between Voatz and independent security experts isn’t surprising, Mill said. But he added that the industry trend in recent years has tended towards greater disclosure and openness, not less – highlighting Voatz’s reaction to the report. It also stresses a common misconception that greater secrecy leads to greater security, he said.

“That basic feeling of security through the dark, that you want to release as little detail as possible to give your attacker as little information as possible, is a very common instinct for many lay people and in some cases by technologists,” he said. Mill. “It comes from fear and perhaps does not understand or appreciate the role of the public in guaranteeing defense.”

.

image source

Security experts raise concerns about the voting app used by the military

The app is designed by the Voatz company, whose technology has so far been tested in West Virginia, Colorado and Utah.

“We want to be clear that all nine government pilot elections conducted so far, involving fewer than 600 voters, have been conducted safely and without reported problems,” Voatz said in the statement. “The real goal of the researchers is to deliberately end the electoral process, sow doubts about the security of our electoral infrastructure and spread fear and confusion.”

The report emerges amid growing concerns about the use of online voting apps and tools in the 2020 election following the failure of reporting tools in Iowa caucuses.

Last year, Utah County, Utah, started using Voatz for disabled and military voters based abroad. In an interview, county secretary Amelia Powers Gardner said that Voatz made more sense than the previous system, which required remote voters to send their ballots via email.

A review of Voatz’s implementation in Utah County – before the MIT report was released – revealed no problems, Gardner told CNN. Gardner said that in telephone conversations with MIT researchers, it became clear that they preferred to vote traditionally, with pen and paper. But Gardner said it is not feasible for Utahns living abroad.

“I have a legal obligation to provide our military members abroad with an electronic form of ballot,” he said, “and if that’s not it, it’s the email – which they agreed isn’t so secure.”

The researchers’ conclusions about the security risks in the app were based on a retro-engineered version of Voatz’s Android app, which ran in a simulated environment. According to the study, a hacker who gains control of a smartphone with the app installed could interfere in the voting process by altering the ballots or finding out which candidate supports a voter.

“Which means they could stop the vote if they knew you would vote for someone they didn’t like,” Mike Specter, one of the report’s authors, told CNN.

Other electoral security experts who have reviewed the MIT document say it looks solid.

“This MIT study appears to have been carefully structured in the way the analysis was conducted,” said Andrea Matwyshyn, an electoral security expert at Penn State University.

Up a conference call with reporters on Thursdayhowever, Voatz criticized the report’s methodology. The company’s executives said the researchers had used an outdated version of the software and that some of the problems found had already been fixed. Voatz also accused the researchers of making “hypothetical” claims based on their simulation, rather than letting the app interact with a real Voatz server.

“We already have this server available,” said Nimit Sawhney, CEO of Voatz. “It’s for our public bug reward program. Anyone who wants to sign up, test the apps over there, against the full-featured real server, can.”

The company declined to comment further.

While participating in the bug bounty program would allow researchers to verify how the Voatz app interacts with the company’s servers, the law largely prohibits researchers from testing the servers themselves, said Eric Mill, a cybersecurity expert who administered technology programs for the federal government.

“The fact that the app is talking to the server is not the same as giving permission to search for the real server,” said Mill.

Critics say Voatz should be more transparent about its technology and what it has used to perform independent audits. Voatz also say earlier reported a researcher from the University of Michigan to the FBI for conducting similar tests on the technology, and the report’s authors cited that episode as the reason why they didn’t contact the company directly.

Instead, they reported their findings to the National Security Department, which routinely acts as a clearinghouse for electoral integrity information.

Voatz said Thursday that MIT researchers should contact them, despite their concerns about handling Voatz’s previous research efforts. He also claimed to have signed non-disclosure agreements that prevent the company from discussing many of its previous audits, although he acknowledged that DHS had carried out its own audit.

The The Coindesk technology news site said it got a copy of the DHS review and reported it on Friday, adding that while U.S. officials encountered few major problems with Voatz, the review focused primarily on the company’s internal network and servers, not on the app that was the subject of the MIT report.

The tension between Voatz and independent security experts isn’t surprising, Mill said. But he added that the industry trend in recent years has tended towards greater disclosure and openness, not less – highlighting Voatz’s reaction to the report. It also stresses a common misconception that greater secrecy leads to greater security, he said.

“That basic feeling of security through the dark, that you want to release as little detail as possible to give your attacker as little information as possible, is a very common instinct for many lay people and in some cases by technologists,” he said. Mill. “It comes from fear and perhaps does not understand or appreciate the role of the public in guaranteeing defense.”

.

image source