Tag Archives: resolution

Despite the differences, the Opposition managed to pass a resolution in the Senate | Instant News


The opposition was able to pass a resolution in the Senate on the price of a coronavirus vaccine on Monday, despite disagreements within the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM).

Senator Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) Kamran Murtaza moved the resolution against the sale of the corona virus vaccine at high prices.

The Senate approved the resolution put forward by the Opposition, with 43 votes in favor and 31 votes against it.

In the resolution, candidates from the Opposition Party demanded that the government provide a free corona virus vaccine or at a lower rate for the public.

Angered by these developments, DPR Leader Shehzad Waseem said the resolution was a statement of demands against the government.

Senator Faisal Javed, on the other hand, called the resolution “odd”. “The whole world appreciates Imran Khan’s strategy against the coronavirus,” he said, defending the government’s move to vaccinate the masses.

Likewise, the Special Assistant to Poverty Alleviation and Social Security for Prime Minister Sania Nishtar warned politicians against mixing the coronavirus with politics, saying fighting infection was a “national security issue”.

The developments came after the PPP and the Awami National Party (ANP) received notifications indicating the reasons for the alleged violation of the Opposition alliance – the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) – the decision and principle of consensus.

PDM Chairman Maulana Fazal ur Rehman has agreed to issue notification of reasons for both parties.

The day before, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said his party is ready to join hands with allied parties and if they refuse then he is ready to act as the Opposition itself, but said his party will not sit easily until they send a packing “puppet government”.

The PPP chairman, addressing a ceremony in connection with the 42nd anniversary of the death of former prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, said that only “they [the PPP] know how to run a movement democratically “.

The PDM decided last month that the PPP would get a Senate seat while the vice chairman would go to JUI-F and PML-N would get the position of leader of the Opposition.

The PPP and JUI-F candidates for the two slots did not succeed in the election, because the general chairman withdrew seven votes from PPP Senator candidate Yusuf Raza Gilani.

Subsequently, the PPP withdrew from the consensus agreement and chose to secure the position of leader of the Opposition by binding several members of the BAP party, which are part of the government.

ANP supports PPP.

.



image source

The Senate passed a resolution on a cheap and free Covid-19 vaccine | Instant News


ISLAMABAD:

A resolution urging the private sector to offer a Covid-19 vaccine for free or at a lower price was passed in the Senate on Monday by a majority vote.

Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam (JUI) Senator Kamran Murtaza presented an at-home resolution stating that citizens of all countries are vaccinated free of charge or at a fixed rate of Rs1,500. On the other hand, the Senator observed, the price of the coronavirus vaccine has been set at Rs8,400 in Pakistan.

“The government has failed to vaccinate the people,” complained the JUI lawmaker, adding that, “Vaccinations must be free or prices must be lowered.”

Responding to the resolution, DPR Leader Dr Shahzad Waseem said the virus was not a political issue and urged political parties to refrain from making it one.

read Pakistan will develop its own coronavirus vaccine, NA said

“This is not a resolution, but an unfounded indictment against the government,” said Waseem, adding that the national narrative must be a reflection of national interests.

He added that neither the politics of protest nor any other threat could deter Prime Minister Imran Khan from his mission.

Senator Wasim also invited opposition parties to cooperate on reform, and hopes the opposition will play a positive role in the DPR. The senator observed that matters related to Covid-19 are not limited to the government or the opposition, but are a matter of survival for the whole country.

However, criticizing the incumbent government’s Covid response, Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Senator Sherry Rehman said that the Covid-19 vaccine is provided free of charge worldwide but a price has been set here.

He further questioned the government about the number of vaccines it was getting from other countries.

The decision to lower the price of the coronavirus vaccine or provide free vaccinations was approved by the majority of votes.

Read more One million Sinopharm vaccines were distributed to federated units, the NCOC said

Thousands of Pakistanis in a hurry to be inoculated during the first round of commercial sales of the Covid-19 vaccine starting at the weekend, with vaccination sites in Karachi saying on Sunday, April 4, that they had sold out.

Meanwhile, personal sales vaccine It has already started, the government and importers are still trapped in price disputes.

The first round saw the commercial sale of two Russian Sputnik V shots to the general public for around 12,000 Pakistani rupees ($ 80) for a two-dose pack.

Vaccine price

On March 21, the federal cabinet deciding to limit the maximum retail price of Russian and Chinese Covid vaccines, which are imported by the private sector amid a sharp increase in coronavirus cases and the absence of a broader government-funded vaccination program.

Cabinet approval came through the circulation of a health ministry summary. That happened on the day PM Imran tested positive for Covid-19, said Special Assistant to the Prime Minister of Health (SAPM) Dr Faisal Sultan.

The government has set the maximum selling price of Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine at Rs8,449 for two doses and China’s Convidecia at Rs4,225 per shot, shows the ministry’s summary of national health services and regulations.

The Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan’s (DRAP) Drug Pricing Committee has proposed a price cap for two vaccines – the GAM-Covid-Vac Sputnik V solution, produced by the Russian Ministry of Health’s FSBI NF Gamalaya RCEM and the Convidecia vaccine, produced by CanSino Biologics Inc.

.



image source

Core-Group supporters at UNHRC have a poor human rights record | Instant News


(MENAFN – NewsIn.Asia) By Sugeeswara Senadhira / Daily News

Colombo, March 25: Despite the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Resolution on Sri Lanka adapted at its 46th Session with 22 members voting for it, 11 votes against and 14 abstentions. This means that the majority (25) did not support the resolution.

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena described the vote as a Global South united against its counterparts in the North. The countries of the South – Asia, Latin America and Africa – refused to vote for the Western-sponsored resolution against Sri Lanka. The world’s most populous countries, China and Russia voted against Resolution and two others with large populations – India and Indonesia – abstained. Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela in Latin America, Somalia and Eritrea in Africa and Asian friends Pakistan, the Philippines, Bangladesh and Uzbekistan, in addition to China and Russia voted against the Resolution.

Let’s examine the countries that support the resolution apart from its Western sponsors. Those who gave in to Western pressure and voted against Sri Lanka include Fiji, the Marshall Islands, Ivory Coast (Ivory Coast), Malawi, Uruguay and Brazil, countries with the worst records of human rights abuses and military coups.

The UNHRC is chaired by the Fiji Ambassador to the United Nations, Nazhat Shameem Khan wearing a Sari which indicates Indo-Fijian origin (his father is Pakistani and his mother is Indo-Fijian). When Fiji was elected to the Council, he promised to give ‘… the South Pacific region a voice in the world’s premier human rights body’. Those who know the South Pacific well point out that ‘Fiji must start by allowing its own citizens to speak and express themselves at home, without fear of reprisals.’ (https://devpolicy.org/fijis-review-at-the-human-rights-council-highlight…)

After all, anyone who has studied politics in the area knows the role of the military in Fiji. The leaders of the two major political parties are not only former military officers but also former coup leaders. Fiji’s racially divided politics is characterized by a split between indigenous Fijians (54.3%) and Indo-Fijians (38.1%), descendants of Indian contract workers brought to the islands by British colonial powers in the 19th century. .

Fundamental Rights

Prime Minister Rear Admiral Frank Bainimarama was the leader of the 2006 coup (he also led the 2000 coup). He has held power, although through several elections in which some of the Fundamental Rights including freedom of speech, association and assembly were not ‘widespread’. His Fiji First Party managed to win the backing of a large proportion of Indo-Fijian votes. The 2018 elections were won by Fiji’s First Party with more than 50% of the vote and 27 seats. The main opposition party, the Liberal Social Democratic Party (SODELPA), led by Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka, (sometimes referred to in the press as ‘Colonel Steve Rambo.’). He is best known for instigating the two military coups that rocked Fiji in 1987. He won about 40 percent of the vote.

Although Rear Admiral Frank Bainimarama ‘restored’ democracy and held elections, he retained a number of decrees from pre-democratic times to maintain power. These include the Media Decree, which limits press freedom and encourages self-censorship (Bainimarama remains notoriously sensitive to criticism) and the Public Order Decree, which limits a group’s ability to hold public meetings.

Its 2013 constitution also states ‘It will be the overall responsibility of the Military Forces of the Republic of Fiji to ensure at all times the security, defense and well-being of Fiji and all Fijians’ – words that are flexible enough with which to rationalize further. military interference in the political affairs of the country. Rear Admiral Frank Bainimarama’s authoritarian instincts remain a concern of many Fijians who believe that the future of ‘democracy’ in Fiji is in jeopardy.

However, all of that is lawful for the West. The West supports the Fiji First Party. The coup and its decisions were democratic, according to the lopsided Western logic.

Another country that has accused Sri Lanka of human rights abuses is the Marshall Islands, a country that was handed over to the US after World War II. The US uses it for nuclear testing. From 1946 to 1958, the United States detonated 67 atomic bombs on the islands – the equivalent of 1.6 Hiroshimas a day for 12 years. The effects are still being felt today, and the Marshall Islands are one of the countries least visited by tourists.

This vast chain of volcanic islands and coral atolls in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, has a population of 58,791 people. The Bikini Atoll, where the US military conducted nuclear tests from 1946 to 1958, is one of the atolls in the chain.

Key issue

The Republic of the Marshall Islands, despite claiming to be a sovereign State, has a Treaty with the US which has agreed to pay at least US $ 57 million annually for its maintenance. Under the Treaty, the United States has full authority and responsibility for the security and defense of the Marshall Islands, and the Marshall Islands Government has an obligation to refrain from taking action incompatible with these security and defense responsibilities.

At the United Nations, the Marshall Islands have always followed the United States and in all major matters match their votes with the United States 100%. For example, in December 2017, the Marshall Islands were one of only nine countries (including the United States and Israel) to vote against a motion adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) condemning the United States’ recognition of Jerusalem as the capital. from Israel. The Marshall Islands still recognize Taiwan and maintain diplomatic relations with it. And of course they also have good human rights records, including the right to sell their babies to the US.

Human trafficking

Apart from the Bikini Atoll, the only media coverage the islands have received has been the recent British media coverage of the stunning and shameless human trafficking ring, which operated for years across the archipelago of the Marshall Islands and the United States. The fray involves pregnant women from the Pacific being lured into the United States with an offer of US $ 10,000 and the promise of a new life in America to give up their baby. If they sell the baby for US $ 10,000, what is the price for the UNHRC vote, one might ask?

Malawi is another notorious human rights violator. One of the poorest countries, in Malawi, democracy is often manipulated by the military. Malawi’s sixth election was held in May 2019. The results of the Presidential Popular Consultation were canceled in February 2020 by the Constitutional Court. The new Presidential Election was held on 23 June 2020 in which Lazarus Chakwera from the Malawi Congress Party and Saulos Chilima from the UTM Party were elected as President and Vice President respectively after gaining 58.6% of the vote. Peter Mutharika of the Democratic Progressive Party and the United Democratic Front coalition, which received 39.4% of the vote, accused the military of electoral malpractice.

Ivory Coast (Ivory Coast) is another country that supports the resolution. On many occasions, the Ivorian government has been accused of impunity and political violence, especially by the army and the politicized judiciary. Ivory Coast holds local elections in October, marked by violence that led to death. Although Ivorian judges continued to investigate post-election crisis crimes 2010-11, President Alassane Ouattara declared Amnesty for crimes related to the 2010-11 crisis, which had raised concerns that victims would not get justice in Ivory Coast courts.

The ICC is currently prosecuting Laurent Gbagbo, former President, and Charles Ble Goude, former Minister of Youth and leader of a pro-Gbagbo militia, for crimes against humanity allegedly committed during the post-election crisis 2010-11. The ICC is also investigating crimes committed by pro-Ouattara forces.

Ironically, these countries with a long record of human rights abuses were among the UNHRC members who supported a resolution against Sri Lanka that clearly gave their former colonial masters a cot.

END

MENAFN25032021000191011043ID1101811033

Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We are not responsible or liable for the accuracy, content, images, videos, license, completeness, legality or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have a complaint or copyright issue related to this article, please contact the provider above.

.



image source

Sarwar ruled out friendly relations with India | Instant News


LAHORE: Punjab governor Chaudhry Muhammad Sarwar on Wednesday welcomed Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s wish for good relations with Pakistan saying that no friendly relations between Pakistan and India other than peace in the region were possible until the Kashmir issue was resolved.

Speaking to the media during the symposium held by Saylani Welfare Trust at the Governor’s House, he said that India must immediately stop atrocities against Kashmiris and poor Indian Muslims and resolve the Kashmir issue in accordance with UN resolutions.

PTI Senator Dr Zarka Taimoor, Saylani Trust representative Bashir Farooqi, Yousaf Lakhani, Afzal Chandiyo and Head of Task Force Main Minister Tanzeela Imran attended the occasion.

The governor of Punjab said that Prime Minister Imran Khan has always advocated peace with India but India has continued the uproar which has jeopardized peace in the region.

In response to questions, he said Narendra Modi’s desire to forge good relations with Pakistan was a victory over the stance of Prime Minister Imran Khan and Army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa, adding that it remains to be seen how long Narendra Modi will cling to him. words.

He said the ongoing atrocities in Kashmir and Indian Muslims would end if Modi was serious about it. The governor of Punjab said Pakistan’s desire for peace should not be considered a weakness, adding that Pakistan would always provide a suitable answer to any hostility from India.

He said Pakistan had also made many sacrifices for regional peace but now India must stop sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan. At the ceremony, Punjab Governor Chaudhry Muhammad Sarwar praised Saylani Welfare Trust for its welfare activities and providing free food for the poor in Lahore and other cities in Pakistan.

He said there was no greater service than service to humanity. He said philanthropists must step up to support oppressed sections of the population. Praising the role of NGOs during the COVID-19 pandemic, the governor said the role of NGOs during the Coronavirus in supporting families is commendable. Bashir Farooqi also spoke on the occasion.

.



image source

After Imran Khan, the Commander of the Pakistan Army called for better relations with India | Instant News


General Qamar Javed Bajwa reiterated the role of Kashmir in the relations between the two countries.

Pakistan Army Commander General Qamar Javed Bajwa said on Thursday that it was time for India and Pakistan to “bury the past and move forward” as he stressed that peace between the two neighbors would help to “unlock” the potential of South and Central Asia. .

Speaking at Islamabad’s first-ever Security Dialogue session in Islamabad, General Bajwa also said that the potential for regional peace and development has always been a hostage to disputes and problems between Pakistan and India – two “nuclear-armed neighbors”.

“We feel it is time to bury the past and move forward,” he said, adding that the responsibility for meaningful dialogue rests with India.

India last month said it wanted normal neighborly relations with Pakistan in an environment free from terror, hostility and violence. India says that the responsibility lies with Pakistan to create an environment free from terror and hostility.

India has also told Pakistan that “talks and terror” cannot go together and has called on Islamabad to take concrete steps against the terror group responsible for carrying out attacks in India.

Kashmir at the core

“Our neighbors must create a conducive environment, especially” in Kashmir, said General Bajwa, adding that any attempt to improve relations without addressing core issues would be vulnerable to external political factors.

“The Kashmir issue is at the heart of this. It is important to understand that without resolving the Kashmir dispute through peaceful means, the process will always be vulnerable to disruption towards politically motivated hostilities,” he said.

The powerful army, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its 70+ years of existence, has until now wielded considerable power on security issues and foreign policy.

General Bajwa’s remarks came a day after Prime Minister Imran Khan made a similar statement at the same venue.

Prime Minister Khan said on Wednesday that India would benefit economically from making peace with Pakistan as it would allow New Delhi to directly access the resource-rich Central Asia region through Pakistani territory.

“India has to take the first step. Unless they do, we can’t do much,” Khan said during his inaugural address at the launch of the two-day Dialogue.

Mr Khan said that having a direct route to the Central Asian region would benefit India economically. Central Asia is rich in oil and gas.

Central Asia, in a modern context, generally includes five resource-rich countries – Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

‘Central Asia awaits’

General Bajwa also said that the peace between Pakistan and India would help “unlock the potential of South and Central Asia” by ensuring connectivity between East and West Asia.

Although, Prime Minister Khan and General Bajwa did not specify the minimum steps India should take, many experts in Pakistan believe that some positive action in Kashmir could reduce pressure on the Pakistani government before holding talks or restoring normal diplomatic relations. .

General Bajwa also spoke about poverty which he said was linked to regional tensions hindering regional connectivity and integration.

“Despite being poor, we ended up spending a lot of money on defense, which naturally comes at the expense of human development,” he said.

However, he added that Pakistan resisted the temptation to be part of an arms race or increase its defense budget despite increasing security challenges.

“It’s not easy, especially if you live in a hostile and unstable environment. Nevertheless, let me say that we are ready to improve our environment by solving all our extraordinary problems with our neighbors through dialogue in a dignified and peaceful manner. way, “he said.

India and Pakistan announced on February 25 that they had agreed to strictly comply with all ceasefire agreements along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir and other sectors.

Relations between India and Pakistan took a nosedive after a 2016 terror attack on the Pathankot Air Force base by a terror group based in the neighboring country.

Subsequent attacks, including one on the Indian Army camp in Uri, further soured relations.

The relationship worsened after Indian warplanes pounded the Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist training camp deep inside Pakistan on 26 February 2019 in response to the Pulwama terror attack in which 40 CRPF jaws were killed.

Relations deteriorated after India announced the withdrawal of special powers from Jammu and Kashmir and the division of the state into two union territories in August 2019.

Talking about the concept of national security, General Bajwa said that it is not only protecting the country from external and internal threats.

“Currently, the main drivers of change in the world are demographics, economy and technology … However, one issue that remains central to this concept is security and economic cooperation,” he said.

He said, because national security includes guaranteeing human security, national progress and development, it is not merely a function of the armed forces and national efforts are needed to protect a nation.

.



image source