Tag Archives: state

West Coast States Announce Two-Week Travel Advisory To Contain Spread Of COVID-19 | Washington | Instant News


(The Center Square) – Three west coast states are asking out-of-state visitors to self-isolate for at least two weeks to help slow the COVID-19 pandemic The new travel advisories were issued by the governors of California, Oregon, and Washington on Friday and also applies to residents returning home from outside the tri-state. Residents are urged to stay as close to home as possible during the holiday season, as all three states are grappling with an increase in the number of cases. “COVID-19 does not stop at state borders,” said Oregon Governor Kate Brown. “With hospitals in the West depleted, we need to take action to ensure that travelers do not bring this disease home with them. ” According to reviews, non-essential travel includes sightseeing or any other type of recreational activity.Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation has projected that the United States will have 320,403 deaths by Jan. 1 and 438,940 by March 1. “The increase in cases is increasing the strain on our hospital systems and threatening the lives of the elderly, essential workers and vulnerable Californians,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom . “Travel increases the risk of the spread of COVID-19, and we must all collectively step up our efforts right now to keep the virus at bay and save lives.” Warned that tight and poorly ventilated spaces on planes, buses or trains are particularly susceptible to spreading the virus. Travel advisories urge people not to travel out of state, ask eg to self-quarantine for 14 days after arriving from there outside the country. The advisory recommends people restrict social activities to their immediate homes, as Washington state health officials urged the public to do this week. “Limiting and reducing travel is one way to reduce the spread of disease,” said Washington Gov. Jay Inslee. The advisories define essential travel as travel for work and study, support for critical infrastructure, economic services and supply chains, health, immediate medical care, and safety and security. The Johns Hopkins University tally places the current US death toll from COVID-19 at more than 242,000. The three governors have warned that more stay-at-home orders are possibilities and have chosen to tighten restrictions in recent months instead of a full order. .



image source

Pennsylvania State Department Updates Travel Advisory | Instant News



WGAL IS 8. KIM: ANOTHER STATE TODAY HAS BEEN HIGH TO TRAVEL RECOMMENDATION. THE STATE THAT HAS BEEN ADDED IS VIRGINIA. SEEING PEOPLE IN THESE STATES, HIGHLIGHTED HERE IN RED, ARE ADVISED TO QUARANTINE FOR TWO WEEKS AFTER RETURN TO PENNSYLVANIA. THE STATE ALSO ADDED TWO STATES TO ITS LIST OF NEIGHBORING STATES THAT MEET THE TRAVEL INFORMATION CRITERIA, BUT A QUARANTINE RECOMMENDATION IS NOT PRACTICAL SUSTAINABLE. MARYLAND AND DELAWARE ARE NOW ON THE LIST, SO THE STATE STRONGLY DISCOURAGES NON-ESSENTIAL TRAVEL TO A Pennsylvania State Department Updates Its Travel Advice List to Include 35 States Coronavirus Coverage WGAL News 8 The Department of Health Health has updated its COVID-19 travel advisory list, adding Virginia to the list. People who travel to the following States are invited for 14 days in quarantine: AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasColoradoConnecticutFloridaGeorgiaIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew MexicoNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOklahomaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVirginiaWisconsinWyomingThe state also added two states, Delaware and Maryland, to its list of neighboring states that meet the travel advisory criteria but a quarantine recommendation not practically viable due to the nature of the patterns of movement between states. The state strongly discourages non-essential travel to and from these border states: DelawareMarylandNew JerseyOhioWest VirginiaMore information for travelers is available on the Department of Health website. The Pennsylvania Department of Health has updated its COVID-19 travel advisory list, adding Virginia to the list. People who travel to the following States are invited for 14 days in quarantine: AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasColoradoConnecticutFloridaGeorgiaIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew MexicoNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOklahomaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVirginiaWisconsinWyomingThe state also added two states, Delaware and Maryland, to its list of neighboring states that meet the travel advisory criteria but a quarantine recommendation not practically viable due to the nature of the patterns of movement between states. The state strongly discourages non-essential travel to and from these border states: DelawareMarylandNew JerseyOhioWest VirginiaMore information for travelers is available on the Department of Health website. .



image source

Travel advisories cause friction between states | Local News | Instant News


BOSTON – With the increase in coronavirus cases, states are looking to limit cross-border travel and this is leading to bad feelings between neighbors. Connecticut last week added Massachusetts to its advisory list. This means visitors to Bay State must complete a travel form upon arrival and show proof of a negative COVID-19 test or 14-day quarantine. During this time, the governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, said he discouraged people in the Empire State from taking non-essential trips to Connecticut, New Jersey, Massachusetts or Pennsylvania. His state’s restrictions also require proof of a negative test, or two weeks in quarantine, for visitors from those states to New York. Gov. Charlie Baker said he called Connecticut and New York officials last week to tell them he thought their restrictions were “a bad idea.” He didn’t go far. “They said, ‘Thank you very much for your opinion,'” Baker told reporters recently. Days later, Massachusetts officials retaliated. The Department of Public Health has removed Connecticut and New Jersey from a list of states exempt from out-of-state travel rules. That means visitors from those two states to Massachusetts are now required to self-quarantine for two weeks or have proof of a negative COVID-19 test taken within the previous 72 hours. Violators could face fines of $ 500 or more. Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont told reporters last week that Massachusetts residents entering his state would not be scrutinized. He said he hoped “to find something with Massachusetts”. “It is absolutely impossible to apply travel restrictions between contiguous states,” he said. “People are crossing the border to get milk or something.” Connecticut also chose not to put Rhode Island and New Jersey on its travel advisory, despite rising rates of COVID-19 infection in both states. Most travel advisories, including in Connecticut and Massachusetts, target visitors from states that have at least 10 new cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents every day. To be sure, most have exemptions for people traveling for work and family, or for routine interstate travel for groceries and other activities. As of Friday, only seven states – California, Hawaii, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, Washington state and the District of Columbia – were on Massachusetts’ low-risk list, meaning that travelers from these places can pass without restriction. . Political observers say travel advisories are inapplicable and lead to tensions between states. “It has created a lot of bad blood and hostility between states,” said Greg Sullivan, senior analyst at the Pioneer Institute, a Boston-based think tank. “And these prohibitions are truly unenforceable.” Sullivan, a former Massachusetts inspector general, said the only ports of entry where travel restrictions operate are at airports and train stations, where visitors can receive health notices and forms to fill out. “cannot erect border barriers,” he said. “And state soldiers are unlikely to arrest people to verify their status.” Although Baker is unhappy with the restrictions imposed by d ‘other states, he always urges Massachusetts residents to follow other states’ travel advisories. “Doing what they believe is the best thing they can and should do to keep their states safe,” a- he recently said. “My only message would be that people should do what they can to comply.” Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for newspapers and the North of Boston Media Group websites. Email him at [email protected] |||| .



image source

Travel advisories cause friction between states | Local News | Instant News


BOSTON – With the increase in coronavirus cases, states are looking to limit cross-border travel and this is leading to bad feelings between neighbors. Connecticut last week added Massachusetts to its advisory list. This means visitors to Bay State must complete a travel form upon arrival and show proof of a negative COVID-19 test or 14-day quarantine. During this time, the governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, said he discouraged people in the Empire State from taking non-essential trips to Connecticut, New Jersey, Massachusetts or Pennsylvania. His state’s restrictions also require proof of a negative test, or two weeks in quarantine, for visitors from those states to New York. Gov. Charlie Baker said he called Connecticut and New York officials last week to tell them he thought their restrictions were “a bad idea.” He didn’t go far. “They said, ‘Thank you very much for your opinion,'” Baker told reporters recently. Days later, Massachusetts officials retaliated. The Department of Public Health has removed Connecticut and New Jersey from a list of states exempt from out-of-state travel rules. That means visitors from those two states to Massachusetts are now required to self-quarantine for two weeks or have proof of a negative COVID-19 test taken within the previous 72 hours. Violators could face fines of $ 500 or more. Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont told reporters last week that Massachusetts residents entering his state would not be scrutinized. He said he hoped “to find something with Massachusetts”. “It is absolutely impossible to apply travel restrictions between contiguous states,” he said. “People are crossing the border to get milk or something.” Connecticut also chose not to put Rhode Island and New Jersey on its travel advisory, despite rising rates of COVID-19 infection in both states. Most travel advisories, including in Connecticut and Massachusetts, target visitors from states that have at least 10 new cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents every day. To be sure, most have exemptions for people traveling for work and family, or for routine interstate travel for groceries and other activities. As of Friday, only seven states – California, Hawaii, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, Washington state and the District of Columbia – were on Massachusetts’ low-risk list, meaning that travelers from these places can pass without restriction. . Political observers say travel advisories are inapplicable and lead to tensions between states. “It has created a lot of bad blood and hostility between states,” said Greg Sullivan, senior analyst at the Pioneer Institute, a Boston-based think tank. “And these prohibitions are truly unenforceable.” Sullivan, a former Massachusetts inspector general, said the only ports of entry where travel restrictions operate are at airports and train stations, where visitors can receive health notices and forms to fill out. “cannot erect border barriers,” he said. “And state soldiers are unlikely to arrest people to verify their status.” Although Baker is unhappy with restrictions imposed by others States, he always urges Massachusetts residents to follow travel advisories from other states. “Doing what they believe is the best thing they can and should do to keep their states safe,” he said. he recently stated. “My only message would be that people should do what they can to comply.” Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for newspapers and the North of Boston Media Group websites. Email him at [email protected] |||| .



image source

Washington County Re-Subjected to Vermont Travel Restrictions | Local | Instant News


Residents of Washington County are again required to quarantine for 14 days before they can enter Vermont after a recent increase in cases where the county has been moved to the Vermont Yellow Zone. After a recent increase in coronavirus cases, Washington County is once again subject to Vermont’s travel restrictions. The state updated its travel map on Tuesday, which shows which counties are subject to the restriction. Washington, which shares a long border with Vermont, had gone from green to yellow, forcing anyone in the county looking to travel to the state for recreational activities to self-quarantine for 14 days before arriving. . Vermonters who visit the county must also be quarantined for two weeks after returning home. The restrictions exclude essential travel such as work. Support local journalism Your membership makes our reporting possible. {{feature_button_text}} Washington County has reported 16 new cases since October 27, the last day Vermont’s travel restrictions were updated. This is the third time Washington County has been subject to Vermont travel restrictions. Warren and Essex counties are also subject to the restrictions. The restrictions come a day before New York City updates its own travel advisory on Wednesday. Instead of requiring residents of states with the number of infections by COVID is high to be quarantined for 14 days upon arrival. in New York, the state will implement a mandatory testing protocol. The new protocol will require anyone who has spent more than 24 hours in non-neighboring states to test negative for the virus within three days before arriving in New York. Travelers must then self-quarantine for three days upon arrival in New York City, and then test negative on day four before being allowed free travel. .



image source