The YouTuber made the controversial assertion whereas talking on his podcast Impaulsive alongside co-host Mike Majlak and visitor Kelvin Peña, in any other case referred to as Web star ‘Brother Nature’.
Paul and Majlak defined how they had been having a “sober, vegan January” earlier than revealing the resolutions they had been going to undertake within the following two months.
Be a part of Unbiased Minds
For unique articles, occasions and an advertising-free learn for simply
Get the perfect of The Unbiased
With an Unbiased Minds subscription for simply
After stating that they had been going to be doing “Deadly February”, throughout which they’d eat steaks and drink vodka, Peña then requested the pair what they had been going to do for March.
“What’s it, male solely March?” Paul mentioned . “We’re gonna try to go homosexual for only one month.”
“For one month, after which swing … after which return,” Majlak added.
Paul has confronted a barrage of criticism following the discharge of the podcast, with many individuals condemning the 23-year-old over his flippant remarks and emphasising the truth that being homosexual isn’t a alternative.
“I can’t consider Logan Paul goes to be ‘homosexual for a month’ prefer it’s some type of development. I’m disgusted,” one individual tweeted.
“Logan Paul joking about being homosexual “for one month” whereas numerous LGBT+ around the globe are killed and committing suicide for his or her sexuality, is disgusting,” wrote social media influencer Daniel Preda.
“He continues to be an terrible illustration of the YouTube neighborhood and reveals he really has realized NOTHING over the past 12 months.”
In 2018, Paul sparked controversy after importing a video to YouTube of a useless man’s physique within the so-called “suicide forest” Aokigahara in Japan.
The YouTuber later apologised for sharing the video, stating that he had meant for it to lift consciousness of suicide prevention.
Paul then responded to the organisation’s tweet, saying: “Very poor alternative of phrases … my fault. let’s get collectively and discuss it on my podcast subsequent week?”
Nonetheless, not everyone seems to be satisfied that Paul’s supposed apology is real.
“Translated: “Poor alternative of phrases, need to come on my podcast subsequent week so I can generate profits off of my poor choice?” one individual tweeted in response.
The Unbiased has contacted GLAAD to search out out whether or not the organisation has accepted Paul’s request to go on his podcast.